RE: JV or Broke4 Oct 2021 14:31
Thoughts ?
Now, I'm all for a critical voice based on genuine evidence - or opinion based on experience of similar circumstances. But your post is riddled with factual inaccuracies. You yourself pick up on what is clearly the meat of your argument; your broken phone meant you mis-read $3.7M as $700K. We all make mistakes. But . . .
UFO is still a multi-asset exploration firm - nothing at all has changed there: iron, silver, copper, nickel, and zinc are all still in the portfolio across five different sites in three different countries.
"One could argue that the company is still overvalued when you compare to its peers" (you get a bonus point for proper punctuation, btw !). At £25M MCAP and an inferred resource of 10Mt of iron (at circa £20 profit per ton - estimates vary) in a region rich in iron, but only 25% of the area tested suggests £25M MCAP is significantly under-valued. Often Fenix is offered as a comparator. Fenix is valued at c£50M.
Earlier this year Turner Pope valued UFO at downside £40M, and that was before the huge increase in its biggest asset. With a combined lower risk profile and a much larger stake in Hammersley, UFO's MCAP ought to be somewhere in the £50M to £90M range right now. In my view, right at the bottom of that range: £50M until Elizabeth Hill tests are published.
Incidentally, in that report 7 months ago, TP valued Donovan at between £9M and £11M of MCAP. So Capstone's retreat is maybe not the big hit - though I'd agree that the earn-in agreement provided significant reassurance financially so long as it existed.
That said, the c£2.5M in the bank is plenty for a full year (at current burn of c£1.2Mpa) so there would seem to be no immediate threat of a placing.
Those thoughts useful to you, at all ?