Member Info for Phimx

Hexam: You wrote

" "so what do you think was shown to influencers then."

Nothing much. If they did successful live demos to influencers then why haven't we heard anything yet? Not very good at influencing are they? "

A most excellent piece of common sense

Mr. Hanging: You wrote

" Method b was the only one not demonstrated - looks like it will be next month"

That's a bold statement, care to say why you think that's true ?

Dooogle: You write

" Zero evidence demonstrations didn’t take place"

I think, since Foggy had RNSd about live demonstrations a couple of times then the demo was a major reason for QBT attending Fort Lauderdale. It is compelling evidence that since nothing about demos was reported then it never happened. You are entitled to your viewpoint and I mine. Others can decide based upon what Gardin said or didn't say as they wish. Note how I am able to string words together without insults and name calling.

The latest RNS can be interpreted as another sleight of hand magic trick by Foggy Gardin. It creates, in the mind of the rampers, the idea of great progress being made! Wildly spinning dollar signs blind investors to the truth, a little careful inspection will show.

The RNS actually says little!

“The team held meetings with leading with a number of the leading companies within

the Bitcoin sector …”

Of course they did, anyone wandering the show would meet with mining rig producers, mining pool companies, influencers etc and have a chat. Could someone investigate the leading players that were actually officially participating in the show?

“The majority of these meetings were with parties who had not met with QBT previously”

So most of 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 companies had never met with QBT before, note they had 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝗲𝘁 before. What have QBT been doing ? Who did they meet and discuss with in the past?

“In order to discuss how operational testing of QBTs methods could be implemented within their existing technologies”

Surely the fantastic brains at QBT could have foreseen this requirement and held, at least, preliminary talks with leading players. ?

Of course the old NDA had to be fitted in, that can waste several week of valuable time.

More importantly Foggy failed to deliver this

“As previously reported we are in a position to make live demonstrations … it is the company’s intention to make the first of these demonstrations at … Fort Lauderdale”

I don't think Foggy is in a position to do any kind of demo. If he made the claim demos had taken place but they hadn't actually taken place then Rios and his mate, and others, would wonder why they had not been invited. So Foggy was stuck between a rock and a hard place when it came to making that claim.

The whole world - 10 mins apparently

Herdie: You wrote

" The buys would have piled in after mining disrupt Jambone that’s pretty much my point, If there was any whiff of this being in any way feasible the price and volume would have gone bonkers after the demo that you are sure happened , The influencers would have been waxing lyrical after filling their boots but nada zilch nothing"

𝗬𝗼𝘂'𝘃𝗲 𝗵𝗶𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗮𝗶𝗹 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆

Usersteve:

Exactly, an update that leaves everyone guessing. I'm sure Foggy's strategy is to release the bare minimum that way it is more difficult to be found wanting.

Vague and ambiguous always has the gullible making up 'stuff' for him

Dooogle:

Unfortunately many of those invested don't believe a word Foggy writes. I suspect you are also desperately disillusioned with this page none event.Roll on the next Bitcoin conference, another free holiday on the gullible.

Irrefutable non-event. I think after reading the board this morning Foggy will realise he erred by not embellishing the report with some drivel about live demos.

Talk is cheap !

Koolkat:

Sit back, relax and wait for the next milestone in a year or so !!!

Perhaps Foggy forgot he was going to perform live demos. After announcing it was a happening and a very significant event it slipped his mind.

Gullible just doesn't do this justice!

Gardin obviously, after reading this board, felt a RNS was in order and he's knocked this up in 5 minutes. But he's failed to live up to the story about live demos. Foggy fails again. How many more times can he fail to deliver before he pulls the plug on this continuous non-commercial money spinner.

A other AIM company squeezing the gullible

Dooogle:

Me, not a care in the world my money isn't in the hands of a jam never CEO whereas you must be worried by another conference and the only result is more waffle from Foggy

The old discussions, keeps the story going for another few months.

See iNSP for how well this delaying strategy worked! No doubt the gullible will soak this up as another great plus

Dooogle: You write

" QBT is a listed company and there for come under inside information and neither QBTs board or its employees will be able to say anything"

𝗕𝘂𝘁 the only employees are the 3 directors, there are no employees in the sense of grafters. The 3 directors suck out lots of lolly from this gig.

Dooogle: You write

" All the players are there, the ones QBT see as a fit and we’re interested were being shown live demonstrations."

Come to think of it why would the big commercial miners want to mix with people intent on ' Bitcoin Disrupt' ?

Can the big players learn anything ? From the very little I've watched it's more waffle than disrupt!

Reality beginning to dawn, something is better than nothing !!

Dooogle: You write

" You forget Jose Rios, a very highly regarded person in the BTC mining community is backing FG and the whole QabT team up."

𝗕𝘂𝘁 he isn't is he?

In the recent little chat he had on line with Skott and others about energy use in Bitcoin mining, how many times did he plug QBT - 𝘇𝗲𝗿𝗼.

The only thing he has done, that we can all agree on, he's posed for a photo! He has done nothing else. That tells me he is not getting paid, because at the end of the day he needs to feed his family and the options Gardin supposedly dishes out have proved 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗵𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 to date.

You assume very much from a simple photo, I wonder why ?

Dooogle:

The problem here is everything is based upon what Gardin says and what the rampers the rampers infer. So its a simple choice believe what Gardin says or don't. 𝗕𝘂𝘁 Gardin's record is not good. He says little and what he does say is vague and ambiguous, he let's the rampers expand the story and assume much. He certainly doesn't try to clarify what's been stated. He pivots from one thing to

another. All in all I wouldn't trust anything he says but you have a choice.

Dooogle: You wrote

" 2. They have Jose Rios & Ronald Bynoe, ex intel of whom JR was responsible for the Intel ASIC backing QBT, "

I have previously posted the identity of the important players in the development of the Blockscale ASIC. JR was not one of them plain and simple. He was not in the ASIC development group. JR held a responsible management position and he may have had involvement in aspects of the marketing and support of the ASIC but the brains behind the ASIC wasn't him.

But I'm sure it doesn't stop Gardin 'bigging up' JRs bio since he likes to do the same for his own.

Koolkat: You wrote

" Never said that Phimx LOL"

𝗡𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗱𝗶𝗱 𝗻𝗼𝘁

𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗜 𝗱𝗶𝗱 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘀𝗮𝘆 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗵𝗮𝗱, I asked if 𝘆𝗼𝘂 knew how a software company worked.