Member Info for Phimx

I'm sure many thousands of investors would welcome some action by the FCA into the companies on AIm, that fleece the British and overseas investors. Millions poured into dreams and the "potential" promises.

It would seem the biggest gains to be had here are not from shorts, because no one is shorting this at this level but from spikes created by those claiming childish animations prove something. Perhaps it simply proves people will believe anything.

Time will tell, bring on the FCA!

Hexam:

I reread the posts obviously you are being flippant. That is a joke to demonstrate proof, some childish presentation.

Hexam:

In all seriousness, you are being facetious, please say yes. All I see is 2 display screens accumulating numbers. Is this what I'm supposed to see?

Hexam:

Not sure which videos you refer can you provide a link. I've just watched one where FG states they have been testing testing testing in the lab with GPOs and ASICs. Therefore QBT have created an ASIC running Method C .

Parker:

" 0134, how can it be a lie when there is a video on the QBT web page which shows method B actually doing this!"

A video no less. I've watched videos of UFO, Bigfoot, lochness monsters, zombies and many many entertaining features ... And ?

I have not seen the videos, how does it show bitcoin being mined, how does it demonstrate the mined probabilities ?

From the earlier poster it seems QBT don't have a single coin to show the methods work.

Parker:

Make that years and years knocking INSP. Still able to knock it because it has produced nothing in 8 years despite many RNS claiming progress after progress.

QBT seems to be following the same path - endless development of something no one but knows exactly what. No agreements with recognised participants in the game just plain old vagueness. A big warning sign to the sensible investor but to the gamblers - crack on!

Parker:

Drivel, my ID on LSE was created in 2016. I think that's far from new. The least you can do is 10 seconds of research, it may help to stop you showing yourself up.

Why on earth would anyone pay to write negative posts or positive for that matter. Every board on LSE divides up into rampers and derampers. The great British public do it all absolutely free. Perhaps there would be neither if clear unambiguous RNS were issued. Why do the dregs of AIM have to be so evasive with information????

Williwonti:

You seem to underestimate the potential power of the PI. It is akin to the collective power of the average housewife, they can determine who rules the UK.

Investors big or small determine who is on the board. Ask VAL shareholders!

Zesty:

I have have different methods, currently trialing them on different investment platforms to determine optimal method. Although results so far are very encouraging and under equivalent regulations and financial constraints I think it can be demonstrated that returns can safely exceed the financial industry's highest upper bounds. I am acutely aware that the returns are being achieved under limited standard deviations attributed to mid to lower level limits of risk probabilities.

Testing will continue and some of the UKs best and largest monetary institutions have been in contact. I shall be meeting with them and hope to forge long and short term commitments as result are consolidated, hopefully before the year end. Bear in mind that risk/reward factors pivot sharlpy according world short, medium and long term vary accordingly.

I hope I have made clear my investment strategy and holdings. Please feel free to ask if clarification is required.

Zesty514:

Since FG is vague, evasive and unable to produce coherent and sensible updates. It is not unreasonable for posters to doubt what he says. On second thoughts he actual says very little of interest after you consider carefully what's been said. What's are the harsh conditions ? What is it that performs under these harsh conditions ? When drivel comes from a supposedly intelligent person, they are either high or spinning a poorly thought out story.

Newbie:

Is there anything more to you than insults and fanciful ramping in the vain hope that In-spirit,will one day, produce a RNS that that actually delivers on its claim

Goingtomoon:

When ?

It is now 40 years since this story first began !

Parker121: you write

" Needs him there to explain the technical side to the new players we want to engage with besides the large miners we already have.

They will all be asking FG for proof and conformation so why go there if this wasn't imminent?"

So FG can explain everything to a bunch of people here but not to his investors in the UK.

The man spouts drivel. Is he talking about the software having to work in harsh environments. Or is it QBTs ASIC ? Military spec ASICs, how many miners are using those ?

Newbie:

You write " Bless you Phimx.. you have just stated you have been here reading 7 years of RNSs ..."

However you wish to interpret those words above, they do not represent what I said.

For your information I have been here since 2016 and I'm still waiting for the launch of this world class product !!!.

It is plainly Obviously I do have interest in this company. It has been an interesting learning experience if nothing else. I discovered thermodynamics and the Stirling engine. I discovered that AIM is a fantastic way to lose ones money. I discovered the British public are naive, stupid and ignorant; although I already had my suspicions. I discovered the British have trouble reading and writing their own language.a voyage of discovery you may say.

As for sad far from it, something else you're mistaken about.

The testing will be strung out again when the part, which has taken 10 months to make, arrives. They built great ships quicker than that! Then there will be discussions with other parties interested in WHR I.e. the Volvo trial will sink into the WHR mire and never take place. Already we see the move away from Volvo to nebulous unidentified companies and so the never ending saga continues.

There's 10,000 born every minute !

Rampers are so fond of citing snippets from In-spirit RNS - why ? Virtually every single one has proved to be worthless drivel. Don't believe a word I say, do your research read the RNS for the last 6 or 7 years and see what became of those RNS statements. Some are plainly absurd others were just empty words with no substance. Interesting to see what's said after a wait of 10 long months of nothing

RNS incoming Friday with little progress on Volvo trial.

Maidit:

And what exactly is stage 4 ?

Another bunch of words with no substance.

We will see, just like every other flop RNS

Maidit:

Of course an update is due. It is now more than 10 months since this was posted.

RNS 14 August 2023:

" ... Although this has caused delays whilst we secured alternative sources to manufacture this component, we are pleased to report that this component is now in design with the manufacturer "

10 months - a joke, particularly since In-spirit should have had drawings and specifications for the part, no design is required. The brilliant engineering minds at In-spirit are fools. They also assume investors are also, I tend to agree.