Member Info for Phimx

Mickdj:

Expose the likes of me and what am I.

I don't expect an answer you never do.

Mickydj: You write.

" I have engaged with you multiple times, exposing your lies and agenda as you and all of your accomplices well know"

Without doubt we all have some sort of agenda, for you to have exposed his agenda is very questionable.

What i know without doubt that you have failed many many times to detail Brew's lies when requested to do so. You claim lies but cannot lay them them before investors to decide for themselves. You don't engage you try to snuff out discussion.

What's your agenda I wonder ?

Llwelyn: You write

" Brew, you've been blown out of the water consitently by far more knowledgable posters than me who ARE invested in QBT."

I for one have seen little evidence of that. The vast majority here are incapable of moun ting any cogent arguments against Brew's post, I include myself in that. Mining crypto is not an easy subject! Responses to Brew's RNS observations are invariably insulting and derogatory. He wins the day every time in my eyes.

I find the interviews FG gives are laughable and devoid of plausible detail. His academic output appears weak at best and his past experience is more business than AI. He doesn't inspire confidence that he can produce novel crypto mining solutions.

Mickeydj: in response to Brew's post you wrote

" ...is implying that QBT will fail in the context of your sentence, and is written in a factual tense. There is no evidence of this and I have reported and documented this report"

Is not the the many RNS claims made by FG which have failed to become reality evidence. Years later there is no verifiable information that QBT can achieve anything they claim.

The rambling interviews and muddled story are becoming less credible each time. That's also evidence but that's my opinion.

Since when does a discussion have to consist of only facts ? What is a 'fact' ?Why are the moderators pandering to the distorted views of mickeydj! I'm all for insults and abusive language being censored but the only people with the power to censor have to decide what is abuse and not pander to one person's interpretation. Who wants to read a board consisting of 'facts', I want to see other people's views/opinions, I want to see the how Brew's posts stand up to scrutiny and counter arguments - that's what a discussion is all about.

Get real admin!

Jn this article showing a minister's tour of the Motherwell manufacturing site where are all the modules destined for?

https://invinity.com/gillian-martin-msp-visits-motherwell-facility-vfb/

Jonny2000: You write

" ...you own no shares and never have ... "

On what information do you base this statement on?

Vivid imagination ?

Mickdj:

Because your single aim here is to prevent sensible debate.

You will not change the fate of QBT with this tactic, that is well and truly in the hands of FG

buffalo:

i'm not sure what investors are hanging on for. in about 16 weeks the company will delist and that's their investment gone and forgotten. in the mean time the price will fall lower and lower.

i hope every ****** that ramped this company is hanging their head in shame right now.

millions lost by uk investors!! they will lose even more as they sit on their hands waiting for a xmas miracle

Jonny2000:

What is said here has no bearing whatsoever on what statements FG will make. Why should you be worried, you know FG is going to announce revenue unless you also doubt FG.

Ambiguity - the foundation upon which AIM is built.

Garwood:

How about " we have completed xyz and have now begun the real time mining of BC"

Or " we have completed xyz and in xyz days/ weeks/months will begin ...."

Or " on x/y/2024 live BC mining will commence ..."

Followed by " it make take several years before QBT obtain their first BC ... "

Daffypicker:

The phrase " "we are now moving, to real, time, hardware based, mining."

Is one of those phrases beloved of AIM companies, depending on your stance it could mean everything or nothing.

When exactly does the mining begin,? " moving to" implies to me that you haven't reached your objective. On the other hand being positive it could be interpreted as, one objective has just completed and the next is just about to begin.

Simply depends upon the time spent "moving"

It's amazing just how many AIM companies are incapable of writing simple, concise and accurate RNS. There is good correlation between vague ambiguous RNS and eventual company failure!

Oldblue:

What point are you trying to make?

Laura: you write

" He clearly got burned on the corrupt INSP which did 20years doing nothing"

Clearly, as my posting history shows I spent 8 years highlighting INSP as a terrible long term play for investors. So for that work I'm now described as a shorter.

Clearly you are posting fantasy. If I remember correctly you ramped INSP and belittled my posts on a company you now describe as corrupt.

Don't waste everyone's time on this board posting bile.

Mickeydj:

" If you think these posters are trying to help you, ask yourself why they have had hundreds of their reported posts removed"

Because you don't like your investment losing you money and it does that because it doesn't produce.

Those sales concern me, particularly so close to an expected rise in the company's fortjnes !

So by my reckoning possible but improbable news within 10 days.

Last day Friday 13 December !!!!!

Have more warrents/shares/options/monies been issued to Grover and others to keep them housed and fed during the long years of development ?

Theoldtrader:

Many thanks for the explanation. Keep up the good works.