RE: UNCITRAL FAQ's26 Nov 2015 20:25
Yes, but without a doubt, this process could easily be a lot shorter with lower case work per Arbiter, more cohesion between the 3, and basically a rocket up the system's ar*s...
I bet this protracted 5 year marathon could easily be sorted in 2 or 3...I don't think the will, of means , to change is there. Like someone said earlier, it's a closed shop, with no-one effectively policing it, or wanting to change it.,
Ultimately, I believe the system has lost its focus on why it's there - to serve justice. It should also send out a message that the system works..
But the message I take from this, is that if you;re a small or medium sized company, which has been wronged, Justice is very very difficult to come by. Justice delayed/justice denied and all that.
You can see why, with creeping expropriation especially , it would be a very difficult decision , and ery brave to decide "That's it, we're seeking arbitration".
The system is Offputting, when it should be there to serve.