RE: Maybe this is just me4 Oct 2021 10:46
Excellent post reposted by me from RNST. Note the rubbish continuous garbage from head PAID RAMPER Heid.
"That’s because Bramhills been in the game long enough and understands that too much detail will give folks something to question or revisit.
Notice how his story can be generalised as
“Now you can never be certain but I think [field/discovery] is pretty special/potentially transformational/largest unappraused target” blah blah... I’m just a normal bloke I’ve done this before I’m very confident, nudge nudge wink wink”
Morecambe and Wise do give more detail about porosity, permeability, oil columns and other technical stuff, but most shareholders don’t understand what it means…and sometimes I wonder if they do too. Firstly it’s about porosity, then they realise it’s permeability that’s important, and they have some because they pumped a load of acid and completion fluids into the formation, so it’s permeable…but now as “expected?” It’s a dual permeability system…and one of them isn’t playing ball..
How about some pressure measurements ? They seem very quiet about those…
And what happened to the liquids they recovered from WNB1z, surely the analysis has been done now…I’m sure it would be helpful to understand what they’re trying to test on A2, where they don’t know what the liquid is as they didn’t recover any last time.
So many questions, so few straight answers…"