Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
“Where’s this “trillion shares” stuff coming from?”
——-
It’s a baited hook.
per ardua ad astra
The first whiff of positivity in weeks and you come up with this? Why on earth would you start a thread with such a title? After all the baiting and petty recriminations, for God’s sake why? Won’t you ever learn?
Jesus wept...
per ardua ad astra
Why would the markets be “all over the place” simply because the son of an anonymous poster on an internet bulletin board is reported to have shared sundowners with a chap he met on holiday?
per ardua ad astra
Fingers crossed - and everything else too - that circumstances might be different this time then, Bob.
It’s just that despite pre-qualification for an IPA guarantee, we’ve seen or heard little that would suggest any form of government support might prove to be forthcoming. And as you may have guessed, I wouldn’t trust Johnson to do anything other than gild his own lily.
Regards,
per ardua ad astra
“Keep an eye out for Boris and his entourage hitting the North East.”
——-
Because Old Etonians are world renowned and famous for their consideration, concern and compassion for who live north of Watford?
If you think a Boris roadshow Oop North is intended for anything other than dispensing a few platitudes and s******ing whilst you swallow ‘em, then I reckon that you’re very likely mistaken.
Pinning hopes worth any more than a jam doughnut on a serial liar and chancer strikes me as nothing but madness.
Good luck to us though.
per ardua ad astra
“it will be uncharted territory”
——
Almost everything about this project is uncharted territory and only a fool will have overlooked that. So what’s your point?
per ardua ad astra
“CO2 emissions do not cause manmade climate change. Don’t listen to the anthropogenic global warming consensus nor any appeals to junk scientific authority based on erroneous climate change modelling. It’s all a hoax.”
—— -
And this clown’s got a vote?
Democracy: the only system where two contestants on Love Island can outvote Stephen Hawking.
per ardua ad astra
“ramping leads to investors taking risky positions”
——-
Abject handwringing, imo.
Careful deliberation and calculated decision making can lead investors to taking risky positions. As can stupidity. You can choose which cap fits
per ardua ad astra
“Never set a target that cannot be achieved!”
——-
A perhaps throw away remark as he stirred the sugar in the unscrupulous Ms Washtell’s tea, and all of a sudden it becomes a ‘set target’.
Aided - of course - by a few bulletin board dip****s who don’t know what “hopefully” means.
As a journalist Ms Washtell will undoubtedly know what “hopefully” means, however, she doesn’t need to. Not when she’s got enough clowns to create a ‘story’ for her.
per ardua ad astra
In my best JR stylee, it’s got to be excellent news for faithful LTHs that Chris hasn’t felt obliged to update the market just to say something when there is every possibility that he is in secret negotiations that are price sensitive. I’m sure when Chris has got something to say all those patient LTHs who have supported the company through thick and thin will get what they deserve and they’ll be well rewarded. I can see on news the sp easily shooting past the 10-15p region at least. Not long to wait now, trusty LTHs.
per ardua ad astra
Hallowe’en or otherwise, there’s no delay in your attempts to spook investors, is there, skier?
per ardua ad astra
Well said. It won’t register though with everyone though. Unfortunately.
per ardua ad astra
“the whole of the North will vote against them for making promises they had no intention of keeping”
——-
Why? What’s different this time?
per ardua ad astra
“any thoughts?”
——-
Perception of risk.
per ardua ad astra
Still wanting what’s best for my country. Because YOUR Brexit’s working well, isn’t it? Got anything I can add to the slurry in this ditch I’m digging?
per ardua ad astra
Does anyone actually want a general election? 10 days before Christmas to boot? It will undoubtedly be poisoned by Brexit related acrimony and it is unlikely to resolve the issue anyway, so what’s the point? Besides, such a significant yes/no decision for the country should be decided without the issue being clouded by party politics. There are Conservatives that want to remain and Labour supporters that want to leave — and such a significant decision for the country should not be subject to the influence of party loyalty. In that way our real voices are only lost.
Like it or not, the Brexit mess was caused by an unwanted referendum and the only way out of this bind is with another unwanted, but, confirmatory referendum.
per ardua ad astra
per ardua ad astra
“We need to reset the process... new prospectus.... new rules, new schedule...etc”
——-
Absolutely. No doubt all will be up for consideration as part of the strategic review.
Cheers,
per ardua ad astra
“why would that have not been possible now”
——-
Obvs. only a fool would fail to recognise that with events as they’ve unfolded (recent demotion from the 250 the latest insult), things are certainly more challenging than any of us would wish, how3ver, I don’t see why such a route to finance is completely impossible now.
The 17/09 RNS outlined a variety of options (naysayers save your breath, I’m quite capable of weighing them up for myself), and I’m pretty sure this is still an option to consider.
Cheers,
per ardua ad astra
Good morning, ffc. As per my understanding your interpretation is correct. An all-in effective yield not exceeding 15% was the limit imposed by JPM. A note with warrants attached (I’ve seen a figure of 13.5% quoted) would not meet the criteria needed to unlock the RCF as it was anticipated the expected returns of the warrant component would take the all-in yield over the 15% limit.
Cheers,
per ardua ad astra
That you were wrong in criticising respondees to a conversation about sales agreements. You are either far too quick by half to look to criticise that you couldn’t get your facts straight, or, you were well aware of what you were doing, but, fancied a bit of a dig anyway.
Neither of which do you any favours, imho.
per ardua ad astra