Member Info for PerArduaAdAstra

“the whole of the North will vote against them for making promises they had no intention of keeping”
——-
Why? What’s different this time?

per ardua ad astra

“any thoughts?”
——-
Perception of risk.

per ardua ad astra

Still wanting what’s best for my country. Because YOUR Brexit’s working well, isn’t it? Got anything I can add to the slurry in this ditch I’m digging?

per ardua ad astra

Does anyone actually want a general election? 10 days before Christmas to boot? It will undoubtedly be poisoned by Brexit related acrimony and it is unlikely to resolve the issue anyway, so what’s the point? Besides, such a significant yes/no decision for the country should be decided without the issue being clouded by party politics. There are Conservatives that want to remain and Labour supporters that want to leave — and such a significant decision for the country should not be subject to the influence of party loyalty. In that way our real voices are only lost.

Like it or not, the Brexit mess was caused by an unwanted referendum and the only way out of this bind is with another unwanted, but, confirmatory referendum.

per ardua ad astra
per ardua ad astra

“We need to reset the process... new prospectus.... new rules, new schedule...etc”
——-
Absolutely. No doubt all will be up for consideration as part of the strategic review.

Cheers,

per ardua ad astra

“why would that have not been possible now”
——-
Obvs. only a fool would fail to recognise that with events as they’ve unfolded (recent demotion from the 250 the latest insult), things are certainly more challenging than any of us would wish, how3ver, I don’t see why such a route to finance is completely impossible now.

The 17/09 RNS outlined a variety of options (naysayers save your breath, I’m quite capable of weighing them up for myself), and I’m pretty sure this is still an option to consider.

Cheers,

per ardua ad astra

Good morning, ffc. As per my understanding your interpretation is correct. An all-in effective yield not exceeding 15% was the limit imposed by JPM. A note with warrants attached (I’ve seen a figure of 13.5% quoted) would not meet the criteria needed to unlock the RCF as it was anticipated the expected returns of the warrant component would take the all-in yield over the 15% limit.

Cheers,

per ardua ad astra

That you were wrong in criticising respondees to a conversation about sales agreements. You are either far too quick by half to look to criticise that you couldn’t get your facts straight, or, you were well aware of what you were doing, but, fancied a bit of a dig anyway.

Neither of which do you any favours, imho.

per ardua ad astra

Not addressing the salient point then? Quelle surprise.

per ardua ad astra

Are you two a double act?

No credibility can be found in labelling respondees ostriches when the sales agreement conversation was started by by someone criticising them. Sheesh... I hope for your sake your attention is better focused when it comes to your own investments. Or is this how it works now, so fixated on criticism of others, you’re now even criticising the very act of responding.

Lamentable.

per ardua ad astra

“ Might be a suggestion to flood the comments section of Ms Washtell’s article on the This is Money website with your thoughts in respect of het journalism”
——-
No probably not. Apart from the reasoned, informative and considered contributions probably being lost among a tide of berating and recrimination, there’s every chance those sounding bitter, clawing, or desperate are hardly likely to reflect well upon Sirius and their investor base. Particularly so if you consider that the average Daily Mail reader is more than likely to rush to a judgement. I don’t think they do nuance.

per ardua ad astra

You ever thought of a career on the stage, KOH?

You do play ‘poisonous little *****’ ever so well.

per ardua ad astra

“The seed of delisting has been sown and will gnaw away at the shares for the coming days and weeks.”
——-
With not a little help from you scattering it far and wide within 15 minutes of the article’s publication eh, skier?

Glad I had better things to do at 22:00 on a Friday night.

per ardua ad astra

“ We live in a society that rewards non workers with a house enormous benefits to breed large familes who continue the cycle.”
——-
No. We live in a civilised society that cares for its most vulnerable. Thank goodness. That some people choose to exploit such compassion, should reflect upon them as individuals and not society at large.

And this country is not **** as you rather inelegantly and unfairly put it. Even with all of its current troubles and recriminations I’m still proud of my country. It’s unfortunate you’re not.

per ardua ad astra

No probs, chriso. When it comes to acquiring knowledge and a greater appreciation for some of the more systemic, procedural or regulatory aspects of this game, b.b.’s can provide us all with a valuable resource which, even it leads to further enquiries or research, can help us all navigate some of the unfamiliar practices or procedures. Invariably it is where facts start blending with opinion we find ourselves coming unstuck and the value diminishes imo. As such, don’t feel reticent to ask any questions when you are unsure or looking to cement any understanding. Anyone who takes the mick or, looks to score points will inevitably always be lacking in some respect themselves.

Regards,

per ardua ad astra

We were all ‘green’ once, and anyone

Nobody ‘bothered’, chriso. It was an ‘A’ trade executed automatically as part of a larger order.

The same will generally applies whether it is the mythical ‘1’ share, 7 shares or 137 shares. Invariably ALL trades of such seemingly irrelevant volumes will be automatic, and I’ll bet you dollars for donuts that whenever some numpty highlights the 1 share code myth, they will be drawing attention to an ‘A’ trade, and NEVER an ‘O’ which would involve direct input.

Regards,

per ardua ad astra

“ The product is rubbish...farmers want potassium, not everything else that comes with the polyhalite.”
——-
Yeah... what would those clowns at Yara know about crop nutrition anyway:

http://www.yara.co.uk/crop-nutrition/agronomy-advice/dont-forget-about-sulphur/

Bloody amateurs. Pfft...

per ardua ad astra

If that’s the case it sounds like common sense to me. If you reverse into an empty bay, you can’t reverse out into oncoming traffic, can you?

If it’s by directive rather than coincidence, I commend our H&S officer for being so thorough.

Cheers,

per ardua ad astra

Good morning, Tex. Thanks for observing that of course I got it. Six idiots dangerously far from their village still took the opportunity to agree with a perceived swipe nonetheless. Probably because, anything - accurate or otherwise - is a good thing thing, if it is a dig at me.

Look forward the whimpers of me being ‘patronising’ or ‘condescending’ from the memories of goldfish when, in weeks to come, my disdain for such stupidity manifests. Still, it’s a shame that the author was unable to acknowledge their error and retract it. It would have been the decent thing to do and served them well imho. Ho hum.

Regards,

per ardua ad astra

“It will probably be a bit of a damp squid [sounds fishy!] with CF stating the several avenues for further finance they will be looking at but with no definite answer to the problem.”
—- -
All the more reason not to perpetuate the belief that we are all waiting for ‘The End Of The Month RNS’™? then. No? Particularly when the CEO was only quoted by a newspaper as being “hopeful”

I appreciate there’s been a helluva lot to get our heads around of late, however, managing expectations isn’t generally perceived as a strong suit for the denizens of is board.

This is as Fraser was quoted by The Times: “I’m hopeful that by the end of October we’re in a position where the strategic review will have reached a series of outcomes that we can then start talking about.”

Anticipating/expecting/waiting for something that isn’t definitely coming only serves to open the door to detractors when it is not forthcoming. It’ll get here when it gets here. And hopefully to all our advantage.

per ardua ad astra