Member Info for Peoplepower1

Capital Events are all about fundraising for the company.

Where companies are having a Capital Events Day, then this is not a good sign.

It means the company needs funds and they're trying to find out who would support the company in, for example, a placing of more shares to raise much needed funds.

So, it looks like Revolution Beauty's Capital Events Day proved fruitless. Nobody interested in buying into a fundraising for REVB. This is a red warning light.

Revolution Beauty are still dependent on their lenders who have put strict covenants on the revolving credit facility. If REVB don't meet these covenants which will be having to achieve better revenue, etc., then the lenders call in the RCF and Revolution Beauty goes bust.

Southcoastbather has shares in Asos, Boohoo and Revolution Beauty with huge losses hence why he doesn't like my posts.

Don't follow Southcoastbather into any shares he is holding.

Never believe anything a CEO says because they're looking out for themselves and not for shareholders.

Reiterating guidance means nothing.

Blablabla - I see on one of your posts you say you normally don't invest in turnarounds because they usually fail. Plus there's too much competition in online fashion you stated too.

As far as I can see you're one of the posters who think the share price is so cheap it must turnaround.

Unfortunately, the Asos share price is likely to go down further. There's no such thing as a cheap share. The market knows this is a failing share and failing company hence the share price where it is.

It usually takes a long time for shareholders to catch up with the market and realise the market is right.

Too much competition, too much debt, revenue is going down and customers are decreasing hence why the share price is at this price.

Plus too little volume in share trading on Asos also tells you nobody wants them except those who think it's a bargain when it isn't.

Asos' revenue is going down and its customers are decreasing too.

Too much debt and is dependent on its lenders.

Two thirds of acquisitions bought by companies fail.

THG has bought acquisitions at much too high prices.

Asos, Boohoo, Revolution Beauty and THG are all dependent on their lenders for survival.

Southcoastbather has shares in Asos, Boohoo and Revolution Beauty with huge losses.

So, don't follow him into any shares he is holding.

Warpaint have no debt.

I am trying to show you the difference between a growth company like Warpaint and a failing company like Revolution Beauty.

Revolution Beauty are owned by their lenders with strict covenants attached to their Revolving Credit Facility.

Warpaint's products are cheaper than Revolution Beauty's products.

The CEO and CFO have already stated Revolution Beauty is not a going concern because they're dependent on their lenders by having to meet strict covenants, otherwise, the lenders can call in the revolving credit facility.

Southcoastbather has shares in Asos, Boohoo and Revolution Beauty with huge losses on all of them. So, don't follow him into any shares he is holding.

Two thirds of acquisitions bought by companies fail.

By this, I mean Top Shop bought by Asos. Debenhams, etc., bought by Boohoo. THG has bought loads of acquisitions.

By the way Anders Holch Povlsen owns a large part of Klarna, so he's made plenty of money out of Asos from Klarna's Buy Now Pay Later System.

Klarna charges retailers for the use of Klarna as well as the customers who use Klarna for their purchases.

Frasers is trying to get a slice of the buy now pay later system by not charging retailers for using the Frasers Plus Buy Now Pay Later System.

Both Frasers and Anders Holch Povlsen know where the money is to be made now and in the future, in buy now pay later systems.

I would think if Asos goes into administration then Frasers or Anders Holch Povlsen would look to buy Asos out of administration.

Maybe, that's their plan.

Frasers and Anders Holch get things wrong too.

However, as I've already stated Frasers are trying to get Asos to use Frasers Plus Buy Now Pay Later System. Klarna is worth more than £30bn. Next make something like £200m profit from their own buy now pay later for Next customers. So you can see why Frasers want into this.

Frasers is going into buy now pay later because they know this is where the money is to be made in the future. Online fashion has too much competition worldwide. It's no longer a growing business area. It's too swamped with too much online fashion. Everybody and his dog are doing it.

Never, never average down on shares. It's throwing good money at bad shares.

No doubt Simon has learnt this. How much has it cost him to average down to £7?

The problem with free information, it costs you money. Just like the posters on these bulletin boards who still think Asos will turnaround.

Asos, Boohoo, Revolution Beauty and THG are all dependent on their lenders. If their lenders pull out, then they all fail.

These 4 shares are high risk shares. For me, I wouldn't be putting my hard earned money into them.

Jamess - stockopedia don't cover options because they're too risky. I agree options are too risky.

I got most of it right.

Mike Ashley sells put options to make money and isn't bothered if the price goes down because he'll buy the shares anyway at the sold put price. Plus, he buys the shares from the buyer who bought his put options and not from the market.

I would think Matthew Moulding has no intention of putting THG on the ftse 250 because this would mean more scrutiny of THG.

THG's accounts aren't the easiest to understand and it seems to me this is deliberate.

Return on Assets is another favourite for investors looking to invest in a share.

Comparing Warpaint whose share price doubled in the past twelve months to Asos, Boohoo, Revolution Beauty and THG whose share prices are on a continual downward momentum

Warpaint’s Return on Assets for their last year’s final results was a plus 23.9%

Asos was a minus 9.69%

Boohoo was a minus 12%

Revolution Beauty was a plus 8.61% - this is expected to decline in the next year

THG was a minus 2.87%

You can see from the Return on Assets why Warpaint has doubled its share price and why Asos, Boohoo, Revolution Beauty and THG’s share prices are on a continual decline.

Return on Assets is another favourite for investors looking to invest in a share.

Comparing Warpaint whose share price doubled in the past twelve months to Asos, Boohoo, Revolution Beauty and THG whose share prices are on a continual downward momentum

Warpaint’s Return on Assets for their last year’s final results was a plus 23.9%

Asos was a minus 9.69%

Boohoo was a minus 12%

Revolution Beauty was a plus 8.61% - this is expected to decline in the next year

THG was a minus 2.87%

You can see from the Return on Assets why Warpaint has doubled its share price and why Asos, Boohoo, Revolution Beauty and THG’s share prices are on a continual decline.

Return on Assets is another favourite for investors looking to invest in a share.

Comparing Warpaint whose share price doubled in the past twelve months to Asos, Boohoo, Revolution Beauty and THG whose share prices are on continual downward momentum

Warpaint’s Return on Assets for their last year’s final results was a plus 23.9%

Asos was a minus 9.69%

Boohoo was a minus 12%

Revolution Beauty was a plus 8.61% - this is expected to decline in the next year

THG was a minus 2.87%

You can see from the Return on Assets why Warpaint has doubled its share price and why Asos, Boohoo, Revolution Beauty and THG’s share prices are on a continual decline.

Simon1367 - considering you bought Asos for over £20 a share, I can see why you don't want my posts on here.

The Indian market is full of online fashion. So don't expect anything from this market for Asos.

Boohoo joined it a number of years ago with no impact so far.

Too much competition already in the Indian market.

Simply Wall St must be the worst source of information around.

Never rely on anything from Simply Wall St.

Wow, wadegarrett, 311,000 REVB shares bought at more than 30p. No wonder you don't like my posts.