RE: Cap-xx v Maxwell Technologies Inc25 Oct 2019 02:14
11. Maxwell has been making, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing products into the United States that infringe the Patents-in-Suit, as discussed in further detail below. On or about September 12, 2017, CAP-XX provided Maxwell actual notice of its infringement of the Patents-in-Suit, explained that the claims of those patents cover at least its supercapacitor with the part number BCAP3000 P270 K04, and offered to license to Maxwell the Patents-in-Suit. Maxwell refused to license those patents and, on information and belief, continued with its infringing activities.
12. At all pertinent times since September 2017, Maxwell had actual knowledge of the Patents-in-Suit; it had knowledge that it makes, uses, sells, offers for sale, and/or imports products that infringe those patents; and it encouraged others to infringe those patents through its activities.
Maxwell have simply refused that they are in infringement of patents and Cap-xx have had to take them to court.. There have been no failed licensing talks as such.
The above 11. and 12. are taken from the actual court documents of the complaint by Cap-xx against Maxwell Technologies Inc.
It is very easy to sign up to PacerMonitor and pay for these documents. They are not expensive to buy.
Research, research, research. You can't do enough research.