Member Info for Pecten11

The tramp steel issue should be pretty straightforward to resolve by putting the ore through a screen before it goes into the crusher - either a physical screen or a magnetic one (or combo)

With the suspension in place, why do you feel the need to try and put the boot in? Does it make you feel more important?

Just gotta hope that for a change HM Gov dont allow such a scientific opportunity to drift and then be taken up by others

Actually I'd go further as this has been independently verified, this announcement could (emphasis on could at this stage) be the most important news release this millennium - if they can prove a repeatable energy gain outcome, then the world may well be very different - climate change could be tackled (CCS would become viable with a cheaper source of baseload energy) and energy supply should become more universal. Sadly, I'm sure that would present new global issues, but one step at a time

Scientifically it's massive news - whether it turns into a commercial opportunity is for the future

Considering that the LNG price and the trucking strike are out of the companies control, suspension seems like a logical step - however, how long AIM regulators will allow it to be suspended for is another matter

Doubling the value of the investee company, not IP group overall

TopGun, how does that work?

FunkyG, the last time you posted 4 days after your supposed buy when the SP had actually gone up - we can all be right with hindsight
At least this time, if we believe you, you actually claimed a buy on the same day - so what price did you get?

FunkyG - didn't realise you were out after your buy signal post at 1.20?

Which Twitter group is doing the ramping this time........

Pennysworth, good luck but based on recent history, (check out volumes against RNS) any uptick in volume is followed by a CLN conversion by Atlas and they still have $millions to convert - it's one of the reasons for the constant slide in SP

Such similar amounts would normally suggest a rollover, but maybe a broker-broker transfer

Such similar amounts would normally suggest a rollover, but maybe a broker-broker transfer

Antharry, you've always had an interesting turn of phrase, but Shakespeare and Dickens......

Chapeau

Ian Budd, if he is still a shareholder is not listed as holding over 3% on the VASt website anymore - he's been diluted like everyone else, though I cant remember a TR1 stating he had dropped below the notifiable threshold

Didn't Formin do drilling on behalf of VAST or they were going to supply a drill rig?

Vague memories....

1nvest 'asset sales would pay creditors back'

Iirc the only asset on the books with an ascribed value is Baita Plai - and that is fully mortgaged, so doubt there would be anything to pay other creditors

1nvest - yeah I know that but what's the point in an acquisition if the major party has been unable to prove they are competent - and as a by-product, a little reputational damage by further associating with them.
I really like JC, but from what's in the public arena about AP, then in this case, his judgement appears to have been off

Ben, imo, it was always a false flag, to act as a distraction to the missed Baita timelines - was just surprised that JC at Botswana diamonds was taken in by it

Just noticed on VAST website that as of 22nd Feb, Axis were listed as holding 16.59 million shares (5.19%)
Anybody got a definitive answer re broker holdings and TR1 disclosures? Do they have to notify if/when the crossed the 5% threshold?