Member Info for Pecten11

Sadly, as your incessant posting proves, LSE admin dont appear to care whether a bb poster is invested or otherwise

Gug - 'Trojan, you have made the same allegations of me and others in the past. Not nice is it ?'

So, if as you say, it's not nice, how do you justify making allegations in your post of 09.21 ?? Or is the level of your hypocrisy getting worse?

Gug 'They turn up in packs etc etc....you know the narrative :-) Paid by the number of threads they create.'

You seem to know about this idea - from your personal experience can you explain how it works?

Vigo 'Share price may drop but in 12 monts it will be not importand at all for buyers at this level.'

Can you explain why, in 12 months, the current share price wont be a problem for buyers at this level? Or do you just have a feeling?
Btw, do you disagree with the fact that Atlas still have over $5million of outstanding bonds that need converting or refinancing? Or do you simply disagree with the facts?

Vigo, over the last few years I've been interested inVAST, made some money, lost some money, but feel I have a better understanding of its history than some (not all) posters.

A more relevant question would be, why challenge me, rather than the content and rationale of my posts?

Please explain what part of my 8.59 post you disagree with and why? That's what discussion boards are for

Nbul1, do you not get it yet, that any increase in volume just provides Atlas with the opportunity to convert another lump of the $5 million odd worth of outstanding bonds.
So, you are entitled to your positivity, but if it encourages any buying, all that happens is that another huge lump of discounted shares will be added to the market.
Vast only has two ways out (they are linked in reality), actually getting Atlas refinance over the line and proving they are sustainably profitable at a topco level - until that happens, trying to ramp the SP will just cause some other PIs to lose cash -

Flyingpie, I would suggest that the difference would be for decommissioning costs that are accrued on an annual accounting basis- I.e. the company knows they will need to be paid but you dont set aside the money required in one lump

Nbul1, any actual, verifiable, fundamental reason why?

Or are you just an aeronaut......

Maybe nbul means 70 divided by 80 - think that's still on the ambitious side without genuine positive news

Lol Mr.B

I know you were joking but - who was the second person to run the mile in under 4 minutes? Sadly passed away this year

Anyone got any ideas re the chunky trade this afternoon?

Do you think this is some sort of 80's text computer game??
May be the right level of challenge for your IQ?

Interesting trades considering the size of the latest Atlas conversion, likley to be broker to broker imo.
Small profit for Atlas though - though they do get some more of their cash back

Assuming they still exist, Vast can issue the warrants any time till next year, which would encompass a GM, so an EGM would not necessarily be needed.
Any request to grant the headroom should be seen as a massive red flag, not just because of the dilution but the voting rights that would go with it - even if they were to potentially be redeemed at a loss

Ripley 'A small 420,000 placing yesterday at 0.84 p'

When you add the 160 million warrants to the shares in the placing, they accounts for around 40% of the then enlarged shares in issues - the only way the warrants dont get used is if the share price doesnt go above .525 until next year

And you call that small ?

'There is value even at 5m mcap! ' - the mcap is already less than half that

The debt is between 3 and 4 times the mcap, with no proven revenue streams to service it

Is that the same TGrus who was shouting "UNDERVALUED" on the 4th Jan at an SP of 1.875

Nice when your analysis is proven right......

The proactive article doesnt talk about the paltry amounts of extra income that the Molybdenum may bring or the size of the 40% fully diluted share placing today

Even in tweets, the still attempt to mislead, suggesting in the tweet below that the Jumbo rig which may help production is already on site, alongside the definition drilling rig.
Wonder why, people dont believe them.....

The mining team at Baita Plai have accessed areas of high-grade ore on sub-level 2, supporting an increase in the level of concentrate production as #VAST continues to advance exploration with new drilling rigs on site – see the new resource drilling rig & Mantis CMR4 Jumbo rig. https://t.co/Ymtc3TWNEd

'#hur Hurricane Oil did 10 bags from its low,'

Hurricane had (still has issues) regarding only getting production from 1 well, one of many differences to VAST though, are regular updates regarding production, debt and cash position
Care to take a guess at any of those numbers here??