RE: Re - AGM15 Dec 2023 14:32
hi carter, i think you may have misunderstood my meaning - in reference to fearg's comment, i was merely clarifying imo that you come away from the agm with a clearer picture in your mind - the bb just gets muddled as people have their own "****ging" matches, and hence, the catalyst to the caustic climate that mafuta refers to.
there are some great posters on this bb, whose opinions get lost once the baiting (from both sides) starts.
i didn't expect much from the agm yesterday in the way of "earth shattering" updates, i was surprised by mr. smith's opening statement as probably were the bod, but, as i said it set the agenda and it enabled most of the "contentious" topics to be aired.
read my two postings regarding agm attendance alongside siverfoil and gunner's comments together with the video link, i don't think there is anything being withheld that isn't in the public domain - as i've stated in the past, i can't "do" the science research like say sog, citizen79,hbd etc... but, i can go to the agm and give an honest appraisal which i'm happy to share on this bb.
hope that clears any suggestion that what gets said "on tour stays on tour" ;-)
good weekend all
gla