Member Info for parkez

BUT dusterhater if you are in the know, you know the price...surely you have an idea of when it will arrive?
What time frame do you envisage?

Really...I think you get my point, pretty obvious you are just as clueless as me...you think you see an opportunity to stick the knife in with todays RNS...but really a placing !!
Can we not have something a little more original?
Tell you what if there is a placing within the next 2 weeks i will gladly donate £50 to a charity of your choice....if not will you do the same?
dusterhater i,m conversing with you.

my guess is we will not get a placing, but i have heard rumours that their is going to be one for 25p...
And my guess and source of rumours is as good as anyone elses.

That should read "Apple could develop their own ota mobile tv service."
No data usage...

shaa,
Content Express to me is the confusing part,What MTV have developed appears to me to be a replica of ATSC 3.0.All the chat and write ups about it being a "bridge" between the internet and OTA. Yet Len Fertig will have been well aware of the ongoing development of ATSC 3.0. Very similar development timelines.YET as far as i am aware ATSC 3.0 has been developed by a consortium of developers, each doing there own little part.(he might have been gambling on it failing?) ATSC 3.0 in reality makes Content express obsolete.(but maybe not in an individual service to mobiles)
Tablet Tv received the signals from ATSC 1.0 so was obsolete on the introduction of ATSC 3.0 without new receivers. Its the licence agreements ...That can be the only thing of value, the reason while Mtv services is still active, i can see no other reason myself?
The licence agreements are for MOBILE receiving through MTV software...
"The Base Technology Licence Agreement provides for the Motive Technology platform which enables the provision of linear and video-on-demand services to mobile devices"
My understanding that a chip has been developed for mobiles to receive ATSC 3.0.
https://www.tvtechnology.com/equipment/silicon-tuner-maker-situne-ships-3-0-receiver-chip-for-mobile-use
Whether MTV software is inside we will have to wait and see.
I am at a loss...i dont have a clue really , clutching at straws but still wondering why there is still life in MTV...surely there has to be a reason for that?

This is interesting ..
This grand vision for ATSC 3.0 would use the new architecture to pick up the slack for certain Over-the-Top (OTT) services and applications in some interesting ways. For instance, it could theoretically lease the digital air-waves to companies like Apple, Google or Microsoft for certain cross-continental transmissions, like software and operating system updates. In theory, ATSC 3.0 could be a cost-saving alternative to quickly distribute redundant transmissions that could choke the “last mile” of today's Internet service. But this will only work for phones with an ATSC 3.0-enabled communications chip.

https://www.audioholics.com/hdtv-formats/atsc-3.0-next-gen-tv-hits-us-markets-2020-1

IF you bring the highly rumoured Apple connection (lets not forget the Apple patent which WAS IDENTICAL to the Content Express developed by MTV) ,once these airwaves are freed up Apple could develop their own mobile tv service.
Just thoughts...same as everyone else.

When I started investing 6 yrs ago one of the first books I read went to great lengths to emphasise the importance of wording in a Rns.
The Rns can be positive but one "negative" word can nullify all the positivity...

The last post by TheOldBee explains exactly why the
" R" should not be used..

With the purchase of Cellrightit was inevitable their would be excess staff that needed trimming.However if you use the word "redundancies" in an Rns you have to except a drop in sp. Could have been worded differently.

We have had the "fear" of a placing for months now, i,m not sure it is that what scared off some investors.
imo it was simply the words "redundancies" and ..
" the Board is seeking to secure alternative funding in the near future which may or may not be forthcoming."

Frustrating it maybe, but if you understand why then its just an opportunity.

The rise to 1.7 is a very good point.
None of us know for sure, we will just have to wait and see...

i can put a valuation on my house...dos not mean its sold.
i think calculations would be the word used if all assets realised.

I would be more confident if they said final calculations.
Valuation is just that a valuation...
Seems to me they are giving a first initial payment that they are happy to pay, giving them more time to realise their assets and keep the holders reasonable happy.
Of course just my opinion and i would love to see the TR-1...but prepared for it not arriving just yet.

it does say final valuation...but a valuation is not a sale?

Thanks for that link,
First payment...still not clear as to whether they will have finished selling tomorrow?
Is that the first payment of finalised calculations? or just a first payment of so far received?

is not the payment on the 30th just a first payment? Link could still be selling after the 30th?
The holders will eventually receive more as more funds are liquidated.
https://www.moneyobserver.com/news/how-should-wind-lf-woodford-equity-income-be-treated-tax-purposes

B2HS2L,
The more i think about the licencing the more sense it makes. Glad i am not the only one with this running through my head. TRX have the right product and a very huge market...big enough for a few more producers. The surgeons/clinicians will need a guaranteed supply before adopting. Certainly makes some sense to me, licencing taks mentioned both verbally and in RNS so not totally living in dreamland. Just hope they can get the agreements signed ...ie before end April!!

Every time i read the RNS the more i feel its been composed to produce a negative reaction from the market...Redundancies? why not just say cost cutting?
Wonder why...Management buyout? ...Hope not.

"During 2019 we leased a new building adjacent to our existing San Antonio facility which, subject to financing, will enable the building of new clean rooms in order to satisfy anticipated demand from our current customer base and potential future partners."

Production expansion is reliant on funding...FUNDING is paramount and yet these delays?
A placing is simple and quick to organise, could do a bookbuild and have it sorted relatively quickly....but no, imo no placing, and they are waiting for something.

Take the funding requirements out of todays RNS and its a fairly positive reading.
Common sense tells you if a placing was on the agenda it would have come BEFORE this RNS.