Caution7 May 2020 08:45
I'm not so sure the RNS is positive. If you compare all the figures to the original RNS, they all got worse. Higher costs, lower recovery and lower IRR even though the study increased the expected gold price by $200. Is a 25% IRR satisfactory?
Here's an extract from the original RNS for comparison:
"Feasibility Studies and Testwork
The Project will seek to use proven mining and processing technologies, whereby the JV Partners believe recoveries of 56% to 60% are achievable, based on feasibility studies and test work completed to date by Minxcon (Pty) Ltd ('Minxcon'), with additional confirmatory test work planned to optimise the financial projections and conceptual designs for the processing plant.
Cost of Production
At 500,000tpm, the Project has projected low all in sustaining costs ('AISC') of approximately US$664/oz for the first five years of full production.
Subject to funding and achieving 500,000tpm within two years, attractive financial returns are forecast, with projected unlevered IRR estimated at 31% at a gold price of US$1,300 (held flat on a nominal basis)."