Member Info for PaddyGall

Come on guys - stop stressing. GH won't be holding any news back - it'll come when it comes and I'm sure it'll be worth waiting for. Patience is a virtue - Paddy

Toze. Look at my posts from yesterday. There's a link on one to the 93 Black Hills report. Black Hills is post of the Paterson project on the GGP website.... GLA - Paddy

"don't exactly"

That's what he said RTC but I think a lot of people on here exactly take his word as gospel any more!!!! Either way - I would put more store in the comments from reddirt recently - if they prove to be correct and SB has completely exited then he's gonna be a tad unhappy....... GLA - Paddy

Nobody knows who reddit is bingo but if you look back at his history he says that he's been involved in mining in WA for the last 25 years - he only joined LSE in Nov 2107 and all his previous core predictions have been spot on.

His initial prediction on HAD001 was made when a GEO friend of his saw the core at the lab in Perth so he seems well connected.

GLA - Paddy

If the core looks as good as reddirt says and it persists to greater depths then would that be enough for GH to issue a visuals RNS as per his previous mo?

Exciting times - GLA - Paddy

Hi reddirt,
any idea what depth that core went to and if it looked good right the way down??

Paddy

Hi MS,
You can access that section from the same page - the one that shows this info is the Minerals Titles Online which can be accessed from clicking the "Online Systems" button. You need to register to be able to access this info.

I've just had a look and that license is still pending - the tenement number is E 63/1953 and it is the neighbouring license to our existing Bromus license.

Paddy

Hi Christophe,
All the historical reports can be downloaded from the Western Australian Government Mining Website.

If you follow this link and then click the "Access WAMEX" button you can search the database using various parameters.

http://dmp.wa.gov.au/WAMEX-Minerals-Exploration-1476.aspx#

Paddy.

I have uploaded another historical Newcrest report onto Google Docs.
This one is for Black Hills from 1993.

Read the conclusions and recommendations section on page13

“All the above factors indicates presence of a gold bearing system at depth”
It then goes on to state that recommendations for 1994 should include “Deep core drilling through the axis of the Dome”

From the info that I have read to date I don’t think there were many (if any) deep core drills completed since these recommendations and certainly none to the 300metres that GGP are proposing.

Roll on July – GLA – Paddy

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1h39E7lDW_bZmrpyFrwCtSnyU9UPSRVOP/view?usp=sharing

Just noticed I was on 666 posts so here's a pointless one to get past it. The girlfriend suggested that we spice things up a bit and play Doctors and Nurses, so I put her on a trolley in the hall and ignored her for 48 hours!! GLA - Paddy

Whenever the update comes according to our friend reddirt it will be worth waiting for. He hasn't let us down yet with his prior core predictions so fingers crossed this time. GLA - Paddy

No worries - the conclusions make for interesting reading especially the bit that says "it is recommended that exploration of this prospect be deferred (but not forgotten)"

Paddy

We had an RNS at the of every month since January on the above subject but we haven't had one at the end of May.

Any significance to this??

Paddy

Hi Rup,
I have uploaded it to Google Docs - try this link to see if it opens for you now.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UoHvITKrIyqpQ7843etyDq56h2807NYj/view?usp=sharing

GLA - Paddy

For anyone who missed it before I posted this link to a report from Newcrest on Havieron and the surrounding prospects from 1995. It is worth a complete read through but look in particular at Section 6 - Conclusions on Pages 17 / 18.

Newcrest must be kicking themselves big time - GLA Paddy

https://1drv.ms/b/s!AiYFACJgXs7G1XBCsLXhJL-W3slJ

HAT,
That would come into the equation no doubt but would be more than offset by the fact that the grade that would be supplied would be multiples of the grade that is being processed now - the output from the plant would increase for the same amount of processing.....

Paddy

OK guys – it might be considered ramping but just doing a few sums during a quiet period at work.
At the moment Telfer is processing ore @ 0.75g/t at an AISC of $1,278
If (and I know it’s a big IF) Havieron were to supply ore @ 2g/t this would bring the AISC down considerably.
If they were to produce say 500,000oz of gold @ say a new AISC of $1,000 (it could be even lower than that) and working on a gold price of $1200 then this would generate a profit of $100,000,000
GGP’s cut would be 25% of this or $25,000,000 – this is for one year – if there is 5 or 10 million oz. down there then this will carry on generating cash for little or no outlay for the foreseeable future.

I know it’s all pie in the sky at the moment but it shows the possibilities here for anyone prepared to stay the course.
GLA - Paddy

That's nice to know - you have always been spot on with "predictions" up to now.

Hope you have a good weekend - Cheers Paddy

Did you mean Core Pawn or "Core Porn" lol