Bob Benbow1 Feb 2018 12:50
I copied to him my understanding that I posted yesterday and he confirmed :
"I think you have a good understanding of our latest resource statement and methodology."
If that is so, one of the things he's confirming is that 2018 drilling will be hopefully looking to increase our resources in both ores.
Not sure about this though from the RNS : " The updated Tulkubash oxide resource, at a cut-off grade of 0.3 g/t, constrained and diluted within a US$1,500/oz open pit shell, identifies: "
Do we think the cut-off grade has been set at 0.3g/t and this equates to 'economic' at $1500/oz? So, if the pog was less than $1500/oz the cut-off grade would have to be raised? In 2016 the cut-off grade for Tulkubash was 0.5g/t. The table displayed in June 2016 for the 2 zones (and the 2 types of mining in the main zone) was much clearer.
Anyway, not, unfortunately, a quick simple boost to our resource we were hoping might drive the sp. The 42% increase in the Tulkubash deposit was dressed in confusion so didn't have any affect. Imo we'll be lucky not to drift a bit until March FS and then we should really get on with the job next summer.
I've also asked Linda aren't we going to get more final details on the Dec 18th fund raise, i.e. final figure raised, shares issued and Concert Party on-going holding. The fact that these funds were raised at 25p and 33p needs as much publicity as possible as it really shows management's and Institutions' ambition.