Member Info for Onetomany

True MM. I am surprised at Hits though. Whilst he is very confrontational and sarcastic, I actually thought he was credible and posted with a sense of logic. Proved complete opposite with this latest insistence. Same as they were about the imaginary default, that appears to also be a knowledge gap rather than just creating fear.

@biff there was a concerted campaign of ramping back then. The CEO was all over largely unknown low profile sites repeating videos. You don’t see that with successful companies. You also suddenly had a whole load of unknown chartist appearing with podcasts stating 70p price targets. Note that none of those have been back with their charts since the inevitable delay RNS.

So yes, it did reach a decent price but I almost think that was the price on news. Hope I am wrong and I would love to see 49p. I am certainly not setting myself up for that level of disappointment though. Do keep in mind the ‘POSSIBILITY’ that they cannot get a deal done by June, that Pharmas may want to see successful P3 before committing too much, that a placing is required in the absence of guaranteed deal funds. These are all possibilities so you must also be prepared for a drop back to the 1p level.

More chance on a decent deal and 20p imo, but let us be honest, all options are on the table from bust to boom.

Very difficult I agree. I think what is important to note is not just the potential, which some are very overzealous on, but also the current state. We have a product that failed P3 trials and is awaiting patent approval. Of course still has potential but it is far from being a done deal in terms of a go to market product.

All the hype and crazy high valuations I guess are considering that this one day becomes a blockbuster and takes 50-100% market share. Now that is years away from now if everything falls in to place, which is possible.

I would tend to look at the reality of where we are and where the market sees things (that’ll be the share price). All the signs from the interview trend for me were negative and over hyped, the poor RNS’s (you don’t RNS a website upgrade, you just absolutely don’t) then the inevitable delay. So many contradictions from IMM that makes you realise this is not as plan sailing as many hoped.

Add to that the risk of pharma not taking on without P3, the risk / potential of a new placing to see them in to 2027. Of course the price is where it’s is and the lack of big shareholders interest is what it is. There has also been a lot of dumping of shares. This, for me, means be cautious.

I think a market cap of £100m is huge, but it also may be a starting point depending on the structure of a deal and timelines.

All will be revealed I think by June but, agree, it’s a lottery.

7.29p

That’s a valuable post from blueside, seems to be his first on IMM that I recall since joining in September. I don’t think I will miss his / her inputs on my objectivity much.

Jen I can give my opinions as I see fit. So long as I’m stating my opinions and reasons then why should anyone have an issue ? Ah yeah because it doesn’t suit their agenda. If you don’t like my views then don’t read them. Zero justification for abuse and mark my words, that will backfire on them.

I’m happy to debate, to argue, but not to take constant abuse. As you can easy see, it will be considered a criminal offence and could result in a custodial sentence.

Sadly yes. And very abusive. I’m surprised LSE don’t do more as it’s their credibility at stake

I have saved every post from you all and I have taken screen shots of my reports to LSE as well as latest threads confirming the removal. The ‘case file’ is now quite substantial.

Please read carefully.

When Online Harassment Becomes Criminal

Police and legal systems often look for specific elements, such as:

Repeated Unwanted Behaviour: Two or more incidents of unwanted conduct (messages, following) can be stalking.

Malicious Communications: Sending messages that are grossly offensive, indecent, or threatening.

For removing all the abusive posts towards me. There is no need to report to abuse, hiding behind anonymous profiles.

What’s important is to have balanced debate and when we are confronted with opinion or information that doesn’t suit our own agenda, we should listen and debate or ignore. But never be abusive and downright childish just because someone thinks different.

This board is like nothing I ever seen. If you pay a concern about the company or its prospects you literally get abused by a group of around 10 posters. If you post £1 by Friday or deal tomorrow then you get double digit recommendations.

For the amateur investors amongst us, this is not how you create wealth guys. Too many have lost their shirts elsewhere by following hype from the herds.

Balanced and reasoned debate is critical and at risk of becoming extinct if hatred and abuse is tolerated by LSE and others.

No grow, ANGS relatively small depending on how it relists . Particularly sad of you though to go searching to see what else I’m doing. Why the obsession ?

FWIW, I subscribed to that AI stock picker Moby. Worried it was a scam but some really good tips there. In a couple of US stocks off back of that. So that’s me .. IMM and ANGS chicken feed, Moby tips, giant chicken feed and one apartment in Edinburgh rented out.

Really quite alarming that hits and wg appear to genuinely not understand. I thought it was just deliberate scaremongering but seems genuine knowledge gap.

Of course you were wrong. I am the only one posting honestly and accurate in this little octagon. You certainly would not want to meet me.

@jenforbadluck, yeah I know, I wasn’t expecting such a surge of childish and incorrect questions and comments. I don’t know why but it does seem some are so obsessed with me, you agree right? Really strange behaviours but at least my presence sees some activity albeit only my sensible posts followed by childish and abusive (less abusive since they were all warned yesterday) attacks.

Presbite I have no idea what you are talking about. I added 100k yesterday and now own 1.7m. What’s difficult to understand, even for you ?

Psebli I own 1.7m shares. Not a lot I know but will be ok if we get a deal worth 20p.

Hlafbutt I don’t go talking about my wealth and career like some others on here but yes, £100k is not a lot to me in the grand scheme of things. If I lose it all it wont change my life, at all.

I just checked. 6.143p is my current average (on the shares bought after dumping all above 10p).

Now that is a paltry £100k invested, hardly significant and worthy of daily monitoring to the decimal point. I was pretty close saying my average was about 6p, yesterdays purchase will have nicked that up a decimal or two but who cars. It’s either £350-500k or £0k with a 60% chance of the former. Decent odds for what is a gamble for everyone.

@dog I don’t pay attention to the micro when I am trading in and out. This isn’t exactly my only investment, nor is it one of my most important. As I did for rookie I’ll post again a copy of the account details shall I?

@mcco Not sure about saying I have no opinion, as I have very strong opinion. May have been a typo.

My feelings haven’t changed since October ish time and you will see that from my posts. I believe that they may get a deal done by June and I think potential to reach 20p. I posted clearly to all when I sold my whole holding (costing I think 5p average) at 11-12p range. Then I bought back recently and my average is now I think around 6p.

I hold 1.7m shares and will continue to add, or sell, depending on what clear signs I see.

Simple as that really. Only contradictory if you want to segment pieces of posts like the other brethren do.

@TC if you paid a £99 deposit on an off plan property for next year but then you bought another house in meantime (that suited you better), would you not cancel the reservation ? I am simply not getting why they would all go at this purported criticial time, if they did not HAVE to. Let’s see