RE: Operational advantages of Hubs.19 Feb 2022 08:40
blockfire, that is correct. Solystic make a fantastic small scale tilt and tip parcel machine and we know that the quality and reliability of the machinery is very good as we already use their equipment.
The issue for some of the smaller Mail Centres is that they have recently had to make way for additional Solystic sequencing machines as part of the Delivery to Specification project which has decreased the available space in the building not only for the extra machines but also additional storage space for the mail that has been held back.
The small Solystic parcel machine is small and can be configured in various ways but my understanding is that some of the inward sortation selections would still require a second break down (due to having a smaller machine and therefore less available selections) thus requiring more storage space and manual handling for the secondary sortation.
Additionally, not all buildings are suitable for expansion either because the site itself isn't big enough, the layout doesn't work or it is not economically viable.
The future development depends upon how long term the BoD and senior management are looking ahead. Personally, I would like to see the BoD splash the cash on some innovative solutions and new buildings but these people are more restrained than I am so I expect that the smaller Mail Centres will end up transferring part (or all) of their operation to their nearest large Mail Centre and potentially see some of the smallest Mail Centres close.
As a side note, in the '90s, one of the then rising stars in the business worked out that RMG would only require twenty six Mail Centres at strategic locations in the UK which was in line with the Dutch model of each office being ninety minutes away from each other by road. Perhaps this is the master plan? The rising star went on to work for ..... Amazon :-)