Member Info for oldschool3

I fully agree. Email the CEO, tell him how many shares you hold and ask for his feedback. He can only give you what he has released into the public domain, but may be able to provide some comfort on the veracity of the transaction.

peter.taylor@pathfinderminerals.com (peter dot taylor at pathfinderminerals dot com)

IMHO and in the opinion of all those shareholders that voted at the AGM to remove you - why has it taken you a year to close a simple sale with AAG? It is not rocket science. Is the word PROACTIVE not in your dictionary? Ridiculous farce now descending upon Pathfinder and it is all your doing. Get your finger out man.

AGM on the 22nd June and this Board will expect shareholders to vote them back in office.

WTF utter nonsense are you dribbling about? Give up.

oldblue, you really have not got a clue what you are talking about. i suggest you write to the board yourself rather than ****ging off everybody on this board with your utter nonsense. maye have a read up on what constitutes insider information too. that might help.

Lookingformoney, IMHO the quality of recent RNS releases issued by the current Board are lacking in clarity. I don't know if it is the Nomad directing the Board or just institutional arrogance towards shareholders.

Bugzy, over on the Telegram group we wrote to the Board for clarification. We were told it is AML paperwork being performed by AAG solicitor. So rather than deal dead, I would surmise it is very much deal is on. As a shareholder you are quite within your rights to ask the Board a question.

Please start by learning the correct use of: OFF/OF and THERE/THEIR/THEY'RE and YOUR/YOU'RE and I'M rather than im, it's rather than its. Would be a good start. Tomorrow's lesson with be capitalisation and punctuation. Then we move on to grammatical structuring and the tough lesson of writing on subject rather than spewing utter nonsense and spamming. Please also note nine regular posters have left this board to interact on Telegram as a direct consequence of your so called humour and personal attacks against anybody that dares to post something interesting.

Have a nice day. Please seek medical attention.

OTB, can you add me please. Oldschool3LSE

TheRealist, welcome back. Yes Align were paid a ridiculous sum of money to write research for PFP and nothing from them. At the very least he could write an informed piece now about valuation for this cash shell. Jennings has so much experience in the market, I know a lot of people would be interested in his take on hidden value here.

I have reported him so many times now. Just fed up of the rubbish he keeps flooding the board with. Admin just remove the odd post. If everybody clicks on Report Post, maybe finally Admin will get the message.

15 years? Are you sure? The licences were stolen and shares suspended 11/11/11 if my memory serves me well. Were you invested 3 years before then? I first bought into PFP around a month before suspension and have held a core, albeit small position, ever since. The game was to buy sub 1p and sell at over 1p. That trade worked really well for years, so I have a free carry now and made a few shillings along the way. GLA, the end is in sight now. I am very surprised no material buyers coming in here yet to advantage from an obvious uplift in valuation.

RNS is out. Finally. Great news for shareholders. The deal is done and you can bet the board already have all major shareholders aligned (excuse the pun) to vote this through at the General Meeting. Happy days. It's been a long long long 12 year wait to see value here. And some shareholders on this board have stayed in all that time!! This is now the time to shout about PFP, bring in new shareholders and enjoy what £2million plus all the recoveries can do in making new revenue generating assets for the business. I for one will frame my first ever dividend cheque from PFP as and when it arrives :)

Adamsky, good post.

In response, it has to be 90% B. As the SPA has been signed and is conditional on PFP shareholder approval, then the only delay in calling a GM can be down to legal work in relation to the acquisitions the £2million will be invested into. It probably makes AIM Rule sense to combine the sale of one asset and the purchase of others on the same day - no RTO involved, just a change of asset class on the balance sheet.

I therefore stay very positive about what is going on here. There will be others that will see differently but don't substantiate their thoughts. GLA

Outsidethebox, how long is a piece of string? OK, for what it is worth, herewith some numbers to get the debate rolling:

Given the PFP era of continual dilution is now behind us, I predict the following -

1. on ratification of the AAG deal at GM - Mkt Cap 5mil sp 0.80p
2. on announcement of new investments that £2mil will be spent on - Mkt Cap 10mil sp 1.6p
3. any news regarding AAG recoveries (given PFP are due a minimum of US$24mil) - Mkt Cap 30mil sp 4.75
4. any announcement of further new investments to utilise recovery monies - sky is the limit.

Lookingformoney, there can't be any further negotiation going on as a SPA/Sale and Purchase Agreement has been signed and the condition precedent will be subject to shareholder approval - hence the need for deal ratification by shareholders at the upcoming GM. The deal is done. If shareholders pass the motion at the GM, then PFP gets £2million.

The board have already said they have due diligenced two target investments to put that money to work.

Timing of recoveries by AAG is an intangible, but in the meantime PFP will have new assets to sweat.

As and when AAG make recoveries, PFP gets 20% with a minimum of US$24million. Given AAG have now signed the SPA, you can bet they are super sure of generating fast recoveries as they will have committed to a spend of US$15million in legal fees to do so.

Now tell me why our share price is so low?

Very good post Adamsky. Thank you.

Oldblue you really haven't understood a simple transaction. Some of your recent posts are bizarre to say the least. What on earth are you wittering on about "IMM transferred via an RTO" and "it's a battery subsidiary, not a separate company" and "cost of new licence and first drill".

Adamsky, spot on.

The 1st February RNS clearly stated that a SPA is to be signed ON THE 21st February, so can't see an RNS out today. Earliest would be tomorrow morning. "..........Pathfinder and AAG are required to enter into a conditional binding sale and purchase agreement (the "SPA") with respect to the disposal of IMM and the Claim on 21 February 2023, unless otherwise agreed by the parties." There is also a chance it gets delayed, note the part about "unless otherwise agreed".

Any idea why the Pathfinder website is just showing Jennings in the list of major (.greater than 3%) shareholders? The new guy that took 100 million shares is not disclosed yet the total shares in issue has been correctly reported at 632 million, which includes the 100 million he purchased. I bet it's because he no longer owns 100 million shares and doesn't want to disclose it was him who was killing the share price by dumping millions of shares at any bid above 0.5. Hmmmm, I wonder.