Member Info for OldFool13

The company will not clarify any price affecting information at that meeting. At best you might get a nod or a wink, which can be extremely misleading. The best any meeting can achieve is to let the CEO the depth of frustration at the current SP and nail him on the reasons for the disparity of information of what is known and what we think has been agreed. I will not attend, not out of disinterest but a reality that nothing will be achieved.

I am of the opinion that the lack of newsflow is completely in line with SEE's aspirations. Keeping market domination out of the limelight and under wraps until more contracts can be secured, re-read Pauls own commentry from a couple years ago. Long term this in all our interests as this news will be released when new cars start hitting the road.

BTW I guess you are referring to the Shares interview?

Https://www.sharesmagazine.co.uk/video/seeing-machines-see-paul-mcglone-ceo?utm_content=221871875&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&hss_channel=fbp-155747097788444

Sadly it does not address the thorny issue of Money, where can new investors find this key information? Those of us invested here can see the prospects, the improving percentages, the increasing likeliness of being the dominant provider and that's why we are buyers. In todays market non profitability is being punished in SP.

Bloody hell, why do you even bother reading his drivel? Every time you reply you give the loser a boner.

I agree with a recent poster that said asked the question of why would SEE want to use PR? The value of not being seen to be market leader is completely misunderstood by many. Go back and listen to Paul's commentary about how the Manufacturers will not allow any one company to dominate the DMS market. The current SP is not really important to SEE but having Manufacturers second guessing another interior software is massive. This autumn will show far more then I expect SEE to ramp up PR, not before. Suck it up people time is against a low SP.

It certainly matches the language of the RNS's of 5th Jan and 9th May and while these items were commented as being for rear view mirror, the 9th may release certainly mentions "Optics"

21.2 is my average, but I have a 10% deficit for selling out at 27p!

Oh how quickly you blow your position. Consider yourself committed to a green blob, you pathetic waste of internet.

I took that opportunity last week, I hope others took advantage of the low share price, was a bit of a gift. In the months to come this price will be a 'kicking yourself' moment.

My guess is that has is an accumulated buy with a collection of sells being scooped up at prices upto 5.46. Then when printed it just happened the last trade fulfilling the order was at 5.46. All ears to any knowledgeable pesron here.

So you are complaining about the SP when it was your investment decision that was wrong then! My decision was wrong to buy and hold as well, if only I had a crystal ball, it would have revealed quite some dilution (I should have seen that coming), a very slow business take up (again I really ought to have have researched better to understand how slow Manufacturers are) and Samsung was always a bit of a long shot.

Cannot really see what the company could have done better or faster really. The business is driven by contracts long in the accepting and signing and big in the proving of the Tech. SEE seem to have maneuvered into a suspected strong position for 12 months time (we'll see) so what is there to continually moan about apart from my own bad timing and acceptance I could / should have traded the prices along the way.

I suppose I could complain about the PR, the rest is all my decisions.

At this point in time I regard this as uninvestable. I am surprised that any of you consider buying more. Personally I will await outcomes and see if the company want to act in a professional manner or not, but sadly this is how AIM allows companies to behave.

I'm going to stick my neck out a bit, I have said for a while that the golden period for SEE will be in the run up to this Christmas, I still feel this is correct. Too many deals have to be done, too many manufacturers have to release details as models are to be scheduled ahead of NCAP. You won't have to wait until Winter.

As long as the fuktards don't call WW3, that just may mess with this prediction!

That seems to have been the point of all those sub 1000 trades, drive the price down and spend 2 days accumulating the panic sellers and wollop everyone with that rather nice buy. A lesson in how to manipulate SETS. Who suffers, well only PI's yet again

That is what the current CFO is working on and should be released in the next couple of weeks. I will only be comfortable with Quarterly reporting once monthly results hitting target are nailed.

Lewbo, I'll learn to read properly, just a silly old fool my end (thought you were replying to me at 21.45). Sorry.

The manufacturers are in charge of the news and they will tell SEE when they can announce any wins. I suspect that that will not happen for a while yet as this secretive industry seeks to keep its interior designs confidential until the launch days of their various models. Our competitors are not announcing wins so the opportunity remains the same. The Bod cannot stop PI's selling and that has happened across AIM and seems irrational sometimes. Trouble is we are still loss making and until the market has visibility of when that will stop, it weakens our allure as a buy.

I won't repeat the same elements I think Paul could firm up, but I certainly hope he takes the opportunity in 4 weeks time.

BTW Lewbo, am I living under a rock and missing something? In the Half year report back in March Paul stated "The current 'active RFQ' pipeline, with program opportunities exceeding a cumulative total of A$1bn". Happy to be corrected.

sipps1 do you have knowledge it is Federated Hermes or is it speculation?

Sadly I did expect a large move south so I sold down my holding to a tenth of its size. but I expected a market wide crash rather than this. Sorry but I don't buy into the manipulation theme, AIM companies not making profits (and even some of those that do) have been hit on market worries. We moved to SETS a years ago to allow for a more stable platform and less likely to be manipulated.

Until the real deals start being done on the 1 Billion pipeline and our CEO is able to predict profitability with confidence this may show weakness. I am looking for some sort of commitment to any placing to be limited in size or even better a loan to be sought rather than dilution as he has hinted at this back along. I have continued frustration at the predicted size of the GM projected sales size (A$7m, yeah right) and can only thin of one reason for this.

If you think this is bad, take a look at SEYE, from 274 SEK down to 66 SEK in roughly a year and they have not announced any wins. The pipeline is still there and it has been my speculation that this autumn will see the real action in the market and in SEE in particular.

Looking at the rounded up sells it appears K2 have not finished, so perhaps Toby wants them out. He is quite assertive that the SP is too low. As for being unprofessional, the current market does not reward news as too many weak buyers, soa different approach is quite welcome.