Member Info for Ojay

Yep: On Febr. 1 this year the SP was 3.15p; on Febr. 7 it was 3.45p and on Febr. 15 the SP reached 6.2p. Thereafter it never dropped further than 4.7p (until today). Wierd to say the least.

Probably not Obelix. Very rational forces are attempting to drive the sp down...as they know what is coming. Sit tight.

should be @4.625 (0% raise). Don't understand these "miscalculations".

GreenManDK: Just limit the price @4.5p I'm sure that'll work!

at all time highs throughout the day. Haven't seen this in a long time. "Wonder" what the MMs are up to….

Not sold out what?
Nice try.

At least we know that there is no longer a reason for flava to show up on this board............as opposed to other posters.

flava: Now that is an unexpected and surprising move. Hope it works out for you.

Bonum: Good to have you on board - knowing that there are PM investors around who have their head screwed on right makes me feel a lot better!

Funny that you would be the first to reply to my post. Now why the heck would you feel to be addressed by my post - particularly if I were off target?

turn out to be as anticipated by the invested community…..the only ones who will be running like mad are the sideliners waiting to jump in at the lowest possible price. Good luck with that!
As I've said recently: It's a strategy you may like or dislike. Unfortunately it is mostly supported by a respective agenda (as certain posts on this board clearly reveal).

D/H: Your personal preference surprisingly supports your investment strategy: Jumping in after the SP takes a blow.

Manro: I really hope I'm right about this: Mike Buck comes across as a low profile guy when it comes to marketing. He'd rather make no promises at all. I believe he's in a clinch between his steadfast POV and the marketing dept's demand to market the hell out of good news (like PM's management around 2010 was brillant at). Obviously the marketing aspect is (usually) good for the SP and particularly for the short term investors. Seems to me Mike doesn't want to follow that path and be transparent all the way. No hype is fine with me - I've seen enough of that a couple of years ago.

D/H: Looks like you do quite a bit of betting...but only as long as it doesn't count.

Thanks for your post C/S: I guess that wraps it up quite well. ATB to you.

"Just for fun" I'd like to make the following prediction:
If Heron-1 testing results turn out to be good or even better (as we all wish) and the SP climbs high (as we all wish) there will be posters on this board who will be calling out the doom and gloom sayers "so where are you now?".
Should the (hopefully unlikely) opposite occur the "other" posters on this board will claim "I've always warned you or even told you so".
It's basically always the same (sad) story which is based on the "who is right" concept. If only we all could leave that behind (accepting the fact that we're all just speculating) and just focus on what is good for investors - we may actually come to other conclusions, opinions and posts.
I know: That appears to be wishful thinking but would be - from my modest POV - would be an ideal basis for going forward on this board.

Topp0: I'm sure your post was intended to be positive including some criticism which is OK.
Just for the record I'm not a native English speaker - but your message has not come across the way you may have intended. From my POV you may want to re-phrase your message so that posters on this board understand what it is you want to express.

not much to add to that: -2.56%.

No doubt about it: That will change - I believe to the better.

Best stay on the sidelines until the action is over.

waiting for Heron-1 test results (such as D/H) before buying in it would be nice to believe that their position is neutral. If that were so, they could just monitor the (RNS-)news and the daily trading development (without posting about all the negatives). Obviously that is not enough: Knowing that after good news rolls in buying back in will be very difficult at low levels they would rather see the SP at the lowest possible level. That seems to accommodate their strategy: BUT IT IS clearly an agenda (as C/S already mentioned today).