B/p - in that case you don't find me annoying, abusive etc. In addition to that you make pre-announcements (like "filtered") which you don't follow thru with - interesting.
Don't try to talk your way out of this: You clearly use the word "reality" although you are merely speculating. Is that how you want to get back at whoever it is? That's what kindergardners do!
OK - at least I now know in which category you belong.
Apart from the fact (reality!) that he has long ago "filtered" me b/p appears to have a crystal ball and consequently knows what is coming, i.e the future which typically has nothing to do with "reality".
It would be wise for b/p - who claims to have filtered me - to mark his posts so that everybody understands that he is speculating and knows nothing about the future.
Looks like we've got another bad sport on this BB.
The truth is brutal sometimes, particularly when it hits you unexpectedly.
You really can't win 'em all - better to deal with reality.
Wager what b/p? You've neither the funds nor the guts to invest in PM (or anything else). What else have you got to put on the table - your grandmother (RIP)? - so who would want to wager with such a charachter?
B/P: "I think at the time..."
Assuming that "thinking" could actually be one of your strengths compare that to mmafr's extremely prudent statement (5 minutes before yours): "....avoid unnecessary speculation".
b/p: Whether you like it or not - you are the most popular negative speculator on this BB. So you may want to take mmafr's proposal into consideration.