Member Info for Offler

Oh here we go, I’ve also answered the rubbish posted by the west/nato bad Russia good idiots. Look at my posting history I’ve said before I’m a Home Office and College of Policing trained DMI and OSINT I work in law enforcement (part time now thanks to my investments) and if I see something that I believe or know is factually incorrect I will do a quick deep scrape and call it out regardless of the opinion of the poster. Trading and Ipaynuffin both posted stuff that was factually and easily proven false. Rather than make spurious conspiracy claims perhaps people should check their facts before they post.

If you want confirmation check the ICO website

Trading4 good The Data Protection Act 2018 is the UK's implementation of the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and sits alongside it, the uk version of GDPR relates to the control of data, a breach of data is still under the amended 2018 Data Protection Act

Seamus perhaps not such a good attempt at sarcasm

Dimitry, well said sir, ipaynuffin is a vile keyboard abuser and I totally concur with your description.

Ipaynothing, there are no separate court precesses for civil business cases, all court procedures come under crim (CPIA) or civil procedures, can I suggest you undertake a two minute internet search, you will find more than sufficient rulings of pre trial dismissal in civil business claims.

Actually civil cases are subject to abuse of process, an example of such and grounds for a judge to dismiss a civil claim before trial would be that a judge rules the case to be so speculative as to have no chance of Success, or if the case was declared malicious or vexatious, the later would normally be followed by a civil restraining order.

In late news Kenneth Williams has joined the cast as Stretch101 Ohhh Wolfe

One day when this saga is over Disney might make a film out of it….

Carry on chasing your loses starring

Sid James as Tilly Ramper Wizz

Phil (Sergeant Bilko) Silvers as when I lose a bet ipaynothing

Charles Hawtrey as Mac the soothsayer

With a special appearance by Timgner as the villainous Russian Mercenary Company.

Come get your golden ticket for the stalls.

I’ve never mentioned it because I didn’t think that an investor could be so shallow as to make that their main criteria. It’s one of nine criteria I consider and it’s a fair way down the list, the fact that a director has their own money invested in no way makes them a good bod nor does it allow them to navigate outside pressures. Patisserie springs immediately to mind….. didn’t the chairman have something like 20 or 25 million of his own money tied up in the company, and didn’t they close the majority of their shops, delist and end up being sold to a private equity firm?

As for recoveries. That’s the same three that immediately spring to mind for me against as I said yesterday a 72% rate of permanent devaluing or delisting since AIM started. I haven’t a clue how many of those 72% of AIM companies had directors with ‘ skin in the game ‘ but I would guess at a fair percentage, why would you start a company if you weren’t invested and intended/hope to profit.

I also remember some gains around 2020 Nicepair, AIM was very generous and giving for a while, the FT article suggests that allowing for peaks and troughs AIM has since its inception consistently performed with the same statistical results In particularly that any investment longer than 6 months substantially increases the risk of loss. The FT message is get out with a profit rather than hang on for the 72% likelihood of losing your money.

Actually Nicepair, it isn’t since 2020, Financial Times research in 2015 showed that since the inception of AIM 72% of all companies listed have permanently decreased in value or delisted, and 30% of all investors invested in an AIM company for longer than 6 months lost at least 95% of their investment. My view it is now at the long odds worth a small punt stage.

As for Putin I invested 2020 and 2021 and withdrew with a profit when the share price increased briefly from low 20’s to mid 20’s , so I would suggest it had already lost around half its value way before the illegal invasion of Ukraine.

In other news a Russian press release states that Pootin is very happy with the results of the elections in the occupied areas, with voting due to end Sunday.

What a ridiculous uneducated response from BaselessDatta no justification for his comment that it wouldn’t happen or explanation why Russia wouldn’t allow it and every AIM company that has ever delisted had its entire history to get to the point where it decided to delist , so what difference does the last three years make.

Excellent point Calls, should add Timgner and BaselessDatta to that list.

Do please tell me BaselessDatta, what difference would it make to Russia if it were listed or privately owned, and your basis for saying Russia would never allow it. Would love to know your thought processes on that claim.

Conversely licences held by Russian subs, Russian subs owned by who? Would that be a UK listed company? Delist in the UK move private company to another jurisdiction not at risk of sanctions bobs your uncle sorted, just in this case Boris would be your uncle.

As an aside 72% of all AIM companies since its inception have delisted or permanently decreased in value.

Thanks Q (how James Bondish 🤣) as I said it was a theoretical conversation, with an example of how Naps got around it, to point out how wrong BaselessData was.

When I started investing in AIM I downloaded a 2015 Financial Times article, just had a quick look, between 2008 and 2015 over 700 companies have delisted.

Yep 75% vote needed, what percentage of shares in issue does the bod hold? From memory with Naps it started with a share issue, the bod bought the new shares something like 17p each DOWN from its high, that gave them the 75% needed and private investors who pretty much all voted against actually had no say in the outcome.

Theoretical conversation where EUA is concerned, the point being that BaselessDatta is wrong again 😑

Dattabase, the company delists, so shares are no longer tradable other than privately, and the now delisted private company holds the same assets regardless of location.

It happened with Napster, Melody VR did a reverse takeover of Rhapsody International (Napster Owner) renamed itself as Napster, did a share conversion 750 into one new share, held a vote to delist 75% shareholder agreement needed, which the bod held, delisted then sold the company and all of its assets (VR patents, VR studios, and world wide music licences) to Algorand an investment and crypto consortium.

Not saying it’s going to happen just saying it does and asset location makes no difference, because the company whether listed or private owns or holds under licence the same assets.

‘Looks like everyone averaging down my portfolio is a mess every share all I seem to be doing is averaging down’. Your comment from 1st Aug, Johnboi, thanks for telling us we are all talking s***🤣