Member Info for ocelot

It's "right" as far as it goes, unless anybody has some alternative figures.
As always, therefore, "buys" and "sells" simply measure the trade price vis-a-vis the mid-point at the time.
UKOG is a liquid stock, so it takes quite a lot of buying to shift the price at the current level.
Hopefully, at some stage, the buying pressure will increase and the source of selling go through a dry spell.

Whoops, read the wrong column:

118 trades including 7 "sells" for a total of 2.634m shares: not bad for a day's work!

118 trades including 2 "sells" for a total of 436k shares: not bad for a day's work!

tomorow:
http://www.basnews.com/index.php/en/news/kurdistan/533707

They will want to get this share price back somewhere nearer to the placing price, if they can.
It may well be that GL approached some of his contacts to help raise the funds.
He won't want them to sit on these losses longer than unavoidable.

Agreed, E_AL.

later this week:
https://www.rudaw.net/english/kurdistan/15072019

Dodger 205
Boyo 207
Rangor 208
JoeBass 209
Broadland 210
Hasiba 212
Stockbuster 213
Withoutt 214
Prime 215
PostieRemy 217
Bunks 219
Leem 220
Hawkey 222
ocelot 225

To each his/her own interpretation, Yanis.

If it was so obvious they were going to call Brockham a dud, there would not have been a 60% fall in the share price when they released the RNS, because the information would have seeped into the market.
The 60%-in-a-day fall is proof there were no leaks and that the decision had just been taken.

If it was so obvious they were going to call Brockham a dud, there was not have been a 60% fall in the share price when they released the RNS, because the information would have seeped into the market.
The 60%-in-a-day fall is proof there were no leaks and that the decision had just been taken.

Probably trying to generate buying interest in that stock so he/she can sell out into strength.

rxdav,

Think we're more or less at the bottom now.
Taking the 26% of gross values of the Brockham RNS and adding in the subsequent placing gives us a net book value of about 2.25p, so the current price already represents a 46% discount to that.
Markets anticipate, so, provided there are no major delays in the Balcombe and Saltfleetby authorisation processes, would expect to see the share price recover as and when progress is RNSd.
If and when the market begins to believe in the Saltfleetby projections of £2-3m net cash flow, then the upside is obviously substantial, given that the current market cap is only £6.6m!

They will want to keep their financing options open for the future.
To put it mildly, it is not good financial policy to have subscribers to a recent placing sitting on losses of 71%.
They will, therefore, want to see their share price recover asap.
Expect them to update the market regularly on progress on Saltfleetby and Balcombe and to study carefully further potentially value-enhancing deals.

Trump wants to be re-elected, so will do all he can to ensure the bubble doesn't burst (pressure on the Fed for interest rate reductions, cooling off of tariff war with China, ...).

At a guess, in the mid 2s (haven't done the calculation, no current intention to sell).

I can hear Flo at the Red Lion calling, so one last comment before I head off:

if the structured finance deal was still in place, then ANGS might well be more or less finished by now.
But GL, with his financial background, had the good sense to get rid of that as just about the first thing he did after his arrival.
The result is Angus is not finished, it survives to fight another day.

Sorry to hear of your losses, YL, but, given your opinion of the stock and of management, think it would be more logical for you to sell out completely.
However, given how far the stock has fallen, and that I am more optimistic than you, this is not something I would do myself.

If you believe the stock is "finished" and you remain invested, you can't blame company management for that.

You say you are one those LTHs yourself, YL.

But surely you can't be, given your opinion of the stock and of management?