Member Info for notrader

It's a' mine I tell ya - mine, all mine!!

I think someone suggested earlier that there might have been a newsleak. If there was, its not Hav or Juri JV related, or NCM SP should have gone up more than it did.

I posted the previous week, when we were under systematic troll attack, that perhaps 'someone' saw it as a last chance to manipulate sentiment before the positive news cycle becomes too great. If so, then the rise could be some 'players' deciding to end their pressure on the sell side, allowing the buying side to gain ascendancy.

Hope the buyers have sticky fingers, as the temptation amongst traders to scalp profits will be high.

Candles - everyone should have a hobby:)

Do your charts say we should buy yet? Or wait until the price goes up more.

Readthecandles - "But why?"

On 20 May you posted "Appears from the chart that a breakout may be on the way."

Maybe your timing was just a bit out?

Colin - "Trying to work out why this share act's the way it has been"(sic)

You've spent months trying to trash this share, shouting down anyone who says the fundamentals are sound and that an uprate is only a matter of time. Even when the answer's in front of your face, you don't see it.

Just in case anyone hasn't noticed, the SP shown above, and to the left, is wrong. A minute ago, google show price as 17.72p

Tiggerman - "An over abundance of speculative , unsupported prognostication."

A good description of your post

Freddie - it depends what it is spend on. If it is spent on exploration, such as the loan to GGP, it is not included in AISC. If, after production starts, it is spent on extracting, transporting or processing then it would be. But AISC would not include the associated costs or fees for the loan.

Spoon - I understand that definitions of AISC might vary, but generally excludes taxes, exploration, depreciation, depletion and financing.

plode - if you have to get another login after you're banned, will that make you explode?

TT - I think it more likely that NCM will follow the stage model, as they are doing at Cadia. They published a PFS for a second zone at Cadia yesterday (one is currently in development), with another 6 or 7 zones still under exploration. It makes sense to me to phase projects in this way to spread out expenditure and maximise early returns.

KP - "I would appreciate your evidence that I present any of my posts as the view of other posters"

Well, perhaps the phrase "For the sake of the rest of us please filter." might suggest that. And, no, no sign of a post wherein you say you changed your approach, certainly not since your posts I quoted. And I did not object to you expressing an opinion, what I found strange was you objecting to others doing something you had yourself engaged in.

Jerry - repectfully must disagree that filtering is beneficial to the board. It may make it more convenient to you, but does not help the casual reader or potential investor visiting the board. I feel filtering is a cop-out, allowing trolls to take over the board with their mistruths and malicious innuendo that all is not well with GGP. Where they can be challenged with facts, we should do so. Where they overstep the mark, they should be reported.

KevinPhillips "The responders are becoming as irritating as the trolls ."

May I remind you that your recent posts have included arguing about funding with one poster you suggest was a deramper, multiple posts responding to another, AR1 who you also accused (wrongly) of being a troll, one post saying "That you Jvetch?" (a noted troll) ...... There are others. No wonder trolls can feel free to accuse this board of having self-appointed 'bouncers' who think their opinion reflects all here.

Colin1 - you also posted in Feb " I trade for set % then slice back to stake, I enjoy the day to day games and trying to beat the house. You win some and you loose some that's part of it. I enjoy participating, keeps me busy."

What possible interest could you have in the long term prospects of this company? You are only interested in short term SP movements. It looks like you are currently out and looking for a lower entry point. You really should have bought earlier this week.

Colin1 - on 29 Jan you posted " I don't claim to have mining knowledge or qualifications but if we have permission why not mine a know asset and realise/monetise it?"

What exactly do you think GGP & NCM have been doing for the last year?

And if you've been reading this board since January, you will know about projected revenue stream. It's been discussed frequently.

Reported them to the FCA lol! Sure we can expect drastic action to be taken.

lebugue - that figure is for the whole province and will include areas outside those you mention. Has anyone seen the report it comes from? Interesting to see the methodology and assumptions used.

Oldernowiser - you fail to mention that this PFS relates to only one target zone, with one in development and at least 6 more zones to come. IRR figures are in line with overall figures for expansion project announced in 2018. Feed in figures for these other zones and see what it does to the NPV and life of mine.

I should know this, but can anyone confirm whether the Juri assays will be released by GGP, or NCM