RE: Just reading the resignation rns again25 Jun 2020 12:16
I agree, goup, that if it had been a particularly acrimonious departure then Dan wouldn't have said or been allowed to make any comment, as his step down was immediate. I think the intention from all parties is to suggest that everything just keeps going as normal, regardless of the real reasons for Dan's departure.
On the other hand I also wouldn't read too much into the words used - you can't criticise everything the man has said and then when he finally goes you turn round and believe him. ;)