Member Info for nomlungu

But less than one in ten thousand acorns become oak trees, so that might not be the best analogy for the future here.

Penguins,

You need to read what UKOG said more critically - the wording is 'it has completed a planned two-week production facility upgrade'. They do not actually specify if it took more or less than the planned period.

This is just wrong = "Law change allows wild birds to be killed to protect game birds in England"

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jan/03/law-change-allows-wild-birds-killed-protect-game-birds-england

So not only can you change the landscape to raise game birds to be shot, but you can then kill crows etc who are attracted to the free food. The Greens will go crazy; will Doris's current wife object? Watch out for the GOV backtrack.

cuddo,

They have existing authority to issue those shares; why do they then want authority for more shares?

Yanix2005,

The nominal value of a single share is 0.2p [or as shown as ORD GBP0.002 on the Stock Exchange]. To raise an 'aggregate nominal amount of £1,099,802' you need to issue 549 901 000 shares at the nominal value of 0.2p.

When a company seeks authority to issue shares, they refer to the nominal amount. Another way of looking at it is that they had authority to issue enough shares to cover the £1.4m CLN as that would have involved issuing 140m shares at 5 times the nominal value of the shares; The £1.4m being larger than the'nominal amount of £1,099,802'.

'Where did you see the Director’s authority to issue shares stated in shares?' - they never say it, you need to do the calculations yourself. For every £1 of nominal value, they need to issue 500 share of a 1/5 of a penny each.

At last year's AGM, ANGS received authority to issue approx 550 million new shares, which took the total allowable shares to 1.466 billion shares. There are now 1.093 billion shares in issue, so there is existing authority to issue 373 million [373 316 389 to be exact] more shares. Now the company wants authority to issue even more shares, so has called a GM.

If 373 million more shares is not enough, how much is?

Good thing the CONservatives live in the real world - Boris is quoted as saying:

"“Voting Tory will cause your wife to have bigger breasts and increase your chances of owning a BMW M3.”"

https://www.thegentlemansjournal.com/boris-johnsons-sensible-quotes/

They are a shadow bank who would need more capital if they want to grow their loan book and restart paying dividends. Interims later this month [6 months to 30/11] will be interesting.

I have some TIME shares which are on the list; I was not expecting a placing there but will have to consider now.

TMS = paid for marketing? Why would I believe what a company is being paid to tell me? Will all the businesses they are promoting need to do placings this year?

A Scottish historian writes:

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-01-02/niall-ferguson-biden-eu-nato-won-t-stop-putin-s-ukraine-invasion?srnd=premium-europe

They say the weather for an attack is good for the next 5 or 6 weeks, so if no open conflict by the end of Feb we may be OK for a while.

'In Liz we Truss' to get ****ed at her mates club and then send us the bill. At least she could have ordered English booze [she does not even need to pretend to like Scotch Whisky, beer from Wales or let alone even care about NI].

"We have had a great funding environment,"

discounted placings?

Excellent news - what an opportunity for UKOG to ramp up production.

kenny,

Glenn Greenwald lost the plot and decided Trump was good; he no longer has anything to do with The Intercept.

In other words - what can we do when people post negative comments when those comments are true?

Healthy debate might prove to have been wise comments if the company does not produce gas in time - does anybody remember that first gas was expected over 16 months ago and counting?

Maybe The Queen is trying to soften the public up in case she needs to pardon one of her sinning sons? After all, she made Tony a knight herself, not GOV or any other selecting body.

Or is she finally losing her marbles; she is in her mid-nineties...

You need a 12ft ladder to fetch the google cache

https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcontent%2F7a950de2-765c-3745-ac96-645759e1f21e

Publishers should not be allowed to poison search engine results with paywalled content

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/jan/01/from-flying-taxis-to-painless-vaccines-seven-businesses-to-watch-this-year

Scancell
This spinout from the University of Nottingham, founded in 1997 by Lindy Durrant, professor of cancer immunotherapy at the university, specialises in developing cancer vaccines and has started testing them on humans. But when the pandemic struck, the company decided to modify its vaccine technology to develop Covid shots, in collaboration with Nottingham’s two universities and backed by £2m funding from the UK’s innovation agency.

The vaccines aim to induce high T-cell immune responses in the body to identify and kill infected cells, as well as generating virus-neutralising antibodies. Scientists say a strong T-cell response would offer longer-lasting immunity, because the protection from antibodies wanes more quickly, as the current Covid jabs show.

As many people are afraid of needles, Scancell decided its vaccines would be administered via spring-powered injectors that use a narrow stream of fluid to pierce the skin. The first trials with 40 healthy volunteers started in South Africa in October, and a further trial is planned in the UK, and data from the studies is expected by June.

The company’s two main shareholders are the US health investor Redmile and the Singaporean Vulpes Life Science Fund, while Durrant and other management own 1.8% of the company. Its shares have rocketed in the past two years, from nearly 7p in early January 2020 to over 20p, but remain far below their closing high of nearly 57p, reached in October 2012.

Who said there was no such thing as a free lunch?

'But it’s only females that hunt. Up to three feet long, they’re about 10 times larger than males. In fact, scientists say that male footballfish are merely “sexual parasites” that fuse themselves to females.

Over time, the male fish lose their eyes and internal organs. Retaining only their testes, they cling to the female fish, providing her with a steady source of sperm in exchange for nutrients.'

https://allthatsinteresting.com/football-fish