Member Info for nomlungu

The CONservatives did... they wanted to be business friendly and cut red tape; no doubt Blue-Liz will announce yet another bonfire of rules. And some of the rules are from EU laws that they intend shredding by Date X, not after they have enacted new legislation.

More from his videos and books I expect.

There was an article about this bloke that mentioned his YouTube channel in the FT. He is a champion of 'no dig' gardening:

https://www.ft.com/content/67dbd255-8ed2-46de-8f42-e03807b14c43
https://www.youtube.com/c/CharlesDowding1nodig/videos

North Atlantic Fellas Organisation #nafo made it to The Economist

https://www.economist.com/europe/2022/08/31/a-virtual-army-of-impish-cartoon-pooches-is-waging-war-on-russia

#NAFO rocks

https://twitter.com/saintjavelin/status/1565763731199610880

How 'local' is local? Can a large landowner be the only person have a say as he is the only 'local'? Or should it be wider; such as the people who use the local water or those who could be damaged by seismic activity? Or, if it is up North, who cares?

Any guesses for what time ocelot will start posting agreeing with 'Adrian aka lemonjuice etc......'

Because, of course, there is nothing suspicious with this new account so it could not be breaking the chat board rules / abusing the fact that the account is only likely to be closed tomorrow morning.

Rumour is that if you add lemon juice to the fracking solution, the water will all drain towards the centre of the earth through the fracked cracks. There it will meet magma and super heated water and steam will be created that can either be used for geothermal or steam cracking of hydrogen. This is known as the win, win, win, win, win[or 5 Win] technique.

Do not lead a so-called 'expert' tell you that this will not work. And, with global warming, lemons can be now be grown in Cornwall. Home-grown lemons improve this to the 6 Win technique.

GOV say natural die off [for the first time in 50 years]. Locals say poison exposed by dredging; disaster anyway; and, for the problem to start at the end of September last year suggests an algae bloom is unlikely as it is so late in the Summer.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/sep/03/we-just-want-the-truth-british-coastal-towns-fight-for-answers-over-mystery-sealife-deaths

But clearly the future of the flagship Freeport policy is more important, and it is already grim up North so who cares / it might even drive more support to frack the wastelands.

12 letters ready to go in on her first day in office... even CONservative MPs are not falling for the "In Liz we Truss" nonsense.

Trump rally

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6OmE7_Ngi8

These people are crazy with their alternative facts...

No wonder Putin wants to control Ukrainian land; abundant energy and food.

evi,

Sometimes IC articles will not open because of their paywall, but they let Google'e web crawler cache the website, so they can seed paywalled stuff into Google's search engine results. Txtify just returns Google's cache of the webpage... It will work on any page that Google has cached if you know the URL [such as Economist or FT articles].

https://txtify.it/

Apparently it works well for e paper readers [I hate broken paywalls].

The article is over 3 weeks old?

https://txtify.it/https://www.investorschronicle.co.uk/ideas/2022/08/11/a-lowly-priced-commodity-play/

Byline Times journalist: 'Boris Johnson's final selfish act tells us everything we need to know about his failed premiership'

https://adambienkov.substack.com/p/boris-johnsons-final-selfish-act

It is fitting that the final act of Boris Johnson as Prime Minister was to spend a large sum of public money on himself.

The news that Johnson’s government spent £130,000 on an attempt to discredit the Privilege’s Committee investigation into him, is in some ways the perfect end to his premiership.

The government’s justification for this expenditure (that it was “a defence of Johnson’s actions in his capacity as PM”) does not bear even the mildest of scrutiny.

The investigation into whether Johnson misled Parliament, and was therefore in contempt of it, is solely related to his role as an MP. It is totally unrelated to his role as Prime Minister, which in any case he will no longer hold after next week.

That Johnson did mislead Parliament is undeniable. He repeatedly told MPs that there were “no parties” in Downing Street during lockdown and that “all rules were followed.”

When a clip emerged of his former Press Secretary Allegra Stratton joking about the parties, some of which he had attended, he told the Commons that he was “furious” at any suggestion rules had been broken.

Will she regret this forward looking [deleted] tweet?

https://twitter.com/JimMFelton/status/1549784279319822343

Agenda-Free TV

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1puzPgC0FYQ

About to start

Doris spending your money before leaving office in disgrace... he has spent 100x what the state will pay a barrister to defend someone accused of murder.

"To put this in context, if you are accused of murder and granted legal aid, the equivalent fee that the government considers fair for your barrister is £1,290.

Less than one per cent of the public funds that Boris Johnson is spending on getting his own legal advice."

https://twitter.com/BarristerSecret/status/1566003014036496385

Did they use the slush to keep the swamp boggy?

She is wearing rose-tinted glasses! Even though she seems a bit unhappy...