Member Info for Nolupus

It has to be TRUE ...written by a german blogger named "JAMBON"

What IMM abuse are you talking about ?? Is saying that benlysta is more effective than Lupuzor an abuse ?? pff

There is a difference in not ramping a product to making.. false allegations It's called ....Freedom of Speech.....like it or lump it....it's called being free to have an opinion...

Amazing but all the posters who try to bully me off this board have "strong buy" opinions..... Benlysta is on the market but is not highly considered by the Fda as being effective....so....you would like the FDA to approve an even less effective drug than Benlysta..... Makes sense does'nt it ....

@4jams No substance, no research, just constant rubbish ??.....That just makes me smile..... Try reading your ramping posts for the last couple of months and check the garbage.....Brush in front of your own doorsteps before bullying others ....imv

As i mentioned already....Frits...Don't shoot the messenger because you don't like the message.... It's not my fault that your investment in IMM has dwindled .....It's not my fault that Lupuzor failed the trial..... It's not my fault that Benlysta is more effective than Lupuzor.....It's not my fault that i am not ramping this company...Blame it on the science.....

@Ullysis, I never said that Lupuzor did'nt actually work, did I ?? The trial Failed...and Lupuzor is shown to be less effective than Benlysta..... The trial however showed a Trend ...but again this trend needs to be confirmed by further analysis and possibly by further trials, imo... So all is not lost.....

@Wigwanner, Thank you for correcting me...It's a pleasure to see that some people are keeping an eye on the ball instead of on the SP...

@Ullysis.....I try to be as objective as possible and i did say that IMM might have found a trend with their results but Science is Science....one cannot deny this....Facts are facts and talk is talk... For ex....However, due to a high response rate in the placebo group, this superior response did not allow statistical significance to be reached (p = 0.2631) and the trial's primary end point was not met. Not please look and compare the placebo rates on this benlysta tria in comparison to Lupuzor ...l and let me know what you observe ....

@MasterRSI, If you don't like the message, shoot the messenger, seems to be the inclination on this board.... Not many even seem to read this news which has major implications on the Lupus "market" ...imo

@Tcglover First of all, I don't try to make people believe anything...just trying to get them to have an "open mind" .. Secondly....No, it's not all negative..Lupuzor failed the trial but they may have seen a Trend..that will need further analysis and possibly further trials to confirm....SO all is not just negative...

@CEO86 Please stop trying to discredit me....I have always said that my interest is in the science of Lupus....I am very dissapointed with the Lupuzor results, which i had expected to be much better.... My biggest wish is that Lupus sufferers find better treatments....

Lupuzor� demonstrated a superior response rate over placebo* (52.5% vs 44.6% "responders"* Please compare and make your own minds up......Science is science....

Extract In analyses of 356 patients with certain clinical characteristics indicative of high disease activity (hypocomplementemic and anti-dsDNA-positive), more patients in the belimumab group experienced reduced lupus disease activity, as measured by what is called the SLE responder index (64.6% versus 47.2%), and there was a lower incidence of severe SLE flares (14.1% versus 31.5%). Also, more people in the belimumab group were able to reduce their need for steroids. Side effects were similar between the groups.

New information out..... https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180420122847.htm

@frits....In light of the results.....Please answer your own question ..... "The Only Question you need to Ask 17 Apr '18 Is Lupuzor better or worse than Benlysta. That will answer the question regards what will happen to the P140 platform. Frits

@CEO86 It seems clear nolpus and nolpu5 are the same people. As in the his last post he adopted the nolpu5 account by accident. His infatuation with IMM is very odd and obsessive I have nothing to do with Nolupu5 ....Someone playing pranks, but whatever...... I am not infatuated with IMM ....but the blatant Hypers are infatuated with me because i try to give an objective viewpoint which does not serve their purposes.... As for Frits...i have nothing to fear from the FCA unlike some on this board who spread false news to Pump and Dump...

@Nolupu5.......Get you're own life, and your own opinions and stop impersonating...

@degsy/almond The Fda chief in a interview said that they would be inclined to approve a more efficient drug but with a higher risk profile ....in certain cases.....

The chances of that happening are close to 0 .....but whatever...