Member Info for nlondon1234

If you are a qualifying investor (meet certain criteria) some financial outfits will hook you up to take part in placings if you wish.
I'm still surprised they pulled this off and managed to find the liquidity to get mint out with such a low mcap aim outfit.Such a shambles and upsetting for all pis invested or not as this symbolic of our junior markets!
We need a retail pi on junior companies' boards i reckon,a bit like man u supporters want, to represent us so we're not totally screwed over as a major funding source, (so they don't become insolvent..), in these markets!
Anyway won't happen.Rant over and commissions earnt again and placees flipped for 10% i guess.

Shoot.Don't pop in often and wondered what had happened to the sp.Death spiral finance is a b""tch always potentially hanging over your head especially with certain other well known aim 'institutions'.Never heard of mint before mind.Sorry for all the lths and no need for anyone to rub it in!

That's why we're bargain bucket at kfc right now instead of m&s meal deal i guess!Also why any good news at all will send us rocketing as you know!;Luckily we don't need to build everything overnight.

The Fed won't hike prematurely to protect the markets imo as they have bigger fish to fry with Biden's keynsian policies.
However i'm not so sure what the inflation data is over here?I guess i could look it up but i doubt it affects aim tiddlers much which are hard to value at the best of times!haha

Sad to see you go sisteract.Just wish us well on the rocky waves as you go.I would have sold out way on different news than a directors buys personally and the market seemed to agree.

Real buys and not options!!Hallelujah.Makes a change for aim.Unless this is part of some demonic grand plan to deceive shareholders (well you can never put it totally past an aim outfit can you), most aim ceos and directors don't even bother trying to pretend they're just on the make for themselves.

Every aim company is its own learning experience!However it does obviously help over time figuring out some of the tell tale signs of things to avoid on aim.Although nobody escapes totally unscathed.

Funny to see in the comments section, investors from different listed companies all saying Don't forget us.Call us!

Sorry i forgot we're main market now but still... at our current marketcap no major funds will be interested unfortunately.

A big bonus indeed.Even the more galling is the bankers and lawyers would have probably suggested this extra deal for another juicy commission no doubt!I'm more annoyed by that as the bankers obviously facilitate all this stuff and on aim we don't have any big activist funds (even if some of them don't get far nonetheless, it's better than nothing) or anything to at least give us retail pis any say or comeback.

Glad to see you're still around and sounds like things are still looking promising for vre.Just need a few others to catch on!

It's really amazing what some scientists get up to and have been up to during the pandemic!

2.82% total disclosed short positions.However some clients of banks can buy under the declaration limit with one or several banks.I wonder if some hedge fund(s) long uipath and short prsm or something?
Slightly increasing declared short positions since the beginning of this year but down from last Novemberish at over 5% to 3%ish.
Somebody is punishing prsm right now anyway.Occam's razor..

No idea.If i knew that......I would be selling my tips daily after placing my trades myself!
However i do see it as a play which i believe has a good chance of valuation appreciation in the long term.I wish i knew what was going on behind the scenes though!

There was a delayed trade for just over 17 and a half grand.That can't have helped the price action.However somebody bought them during the day obviously as the price didn't tank.

Fund managers are benchmarked regularly and want to keep earning their regular commisions nomatter what.So they do need to keep up with the Jones so to speak to attract new punters on the big platforms.
Otherwise it depends on the market.Many parts of markets now are overleveraged thus can be margin called by the likes of Goldman, some are reacting to other market information such as potential future inflation data, some need to sell because retail investors are selling and want their money back now.
I'm not sure how many funds are invested in aim shares but i'm assuming it's more of a nice area with regards to funds under management.There can be tax benefits for investing in aim though i believe.

Still around but haven't posted for a while!I was somewhat scratching my head too, but nice to learn something new everyday Gerry.Keeps the old grey matter ticking over.

Some nice, chunky, more institutional action over the last few days but not moving much.

Sometimes i think the whole issue with aim is the way they get huge renumeration packets relative to privately owned companies for the senior staff for dismal performance.We all know that with 'innovative' products and research costs, things can cost more than perhaps some other privately owned companies operating in more traditional sectors.

However, surely elsewhere these lot would have failed performance reviews numerous times and wouldn't be so heartily rewarded for not meeting them (nevermind revenue and profit targets longerterm)!We would have attracted activist investors, who could see the innate ip value agitating for change, if we were main market with a serious market cap by now!

Unfortunately we are the problem, 'lending' them our money so easily and often and we can't do anything about it.A bit like Man U fans and the Glazers!Aim needs some sort of reform, which doesn't have to increase the listing or maintenance fees of a listing much afaik (like a regular pi voted onto the board to provide some oversight); which we all know will never happen as the nomads, brokers, etc.. are all happy with the fees they get and the arrangements so far.Anyway rant over.

At least we are being told we won't become an ip shell now?That was what worried me the most before the latest rns (but maybe it's still a concern even with revenue growth?).I didn't really understand why nano was considering that.
Does their research cost that much they couldn't just undertake a placing to keep it going like most aim companies do?From the interims :

'In the event that the Group does not deliver new sources of commercial revenue in the short term or achieve other sources of funding, a more significant restructuring will be required that removes the Group's R&D, production and scale up capabilities with the remaining business focussed on protecting the IP portfolio and the lawsuit against Samsung. In this scenario, the cash runway extends to the middle of 2022.'
Otherwise it's just a potentially long wait for a chance at an as yet unknown cash settlement, which hopefully will be big but still.Markets don't value cash sat in the bank as much as cash invested for growth too.We need R&D to increase our valuation by the market in the meantime imo.We can't consider cutting it!