Member Info for NikeAir180

18:21... Additionally, 2015 x 2 with everything else being the same could have positively left room for a pub meal with a beverage and then perhaps, a couple of pints with a beer mat or two sociable beer mats.

The above is just another variation of counting within a day, within a week, a few weeks before another year goes by.

11 x 90 = 990. 2000 × 2 = 4000. RRR was 0.58 when Helpful first posted - 10/11/17, it was 1.15 during a post in March 2018 by Robins. I think the slight difference less than an exact double added to 990 - derived from 3000 could have left a slight loss similar to the cost of a pub meal - beverage included with enough left over for a pint with a beer mat.

The above is just another variation of counting, within a day, as the years go by.

Beer mats.

... shrug.

"Who knows?" : )

By that I did not mean vacation.

For someone so negative Banbury, you seem to be impatient for RRR news. Visits to mines and cognition take time.

🍻

🏝

Even if you were getting an £11:50 pub lunch - beer included Banbury, you might find some decorative copper within the interor of the building, or perhaps a small amount in a single malt whisky, trace amount in some ales sometimes.

I once spoke with one in a a pub who had been offerered beverage - a stout while picking up keys and family member to drive home. Six months out from retirement and was happy to moderately opine on a political sacking (my expression) that was purely the level of random... in the street opinion but their expertise was - they they had a lot of intelligence, which was of course not discussed.

Banbury do you make a note of which pubs have beer mats and which don't?

Manganese and copper might have some relevance to industrial nails and potentially Red Rock Resources.

The RRR publication of consecutive annual reports and this year's half-year report, as a contrast to your written opinions that they would not do so by the time due, proves that you have beem repeatedly wrong Banbury.

Mines...

Mines...

Well Theeeduke, I have some balance - a junior miner sitting on a wold class asset is up appox. 95% compared to my stake. i have a junior oil and gas stock which is up approx. 169% up with a farm in from a major, I have taken some profit on that - the rest of it I am maintaining.

There was one company I recently added about 250% shares, within five weeks they were up 120% but I am 20% down on the average. One morning early some time ago I had wanted to double a smaller position, stupidly I pressed sell instead of buy so then had to buy double the position to start it off again at a higher average. It declined for a while, i sold down without exiting, but then added back to what it had originally been that day in terms of stake - without all other things being the same I think it would be par now or perhaps slghtly better, regardless - if they can do some of what they are trying to achieve, I think it might be a core holding for me.

The larger infrastructure stock I bought in replacement of the declinning (at the time) minnow has been on the up - moderately - might be a steady one, I don't top up or maintain every company I find interesting, we all have our limits whether that is money or simply effort but I wll occasionally catch up to see what is going on.

Some positions are of course in the negative but RRR is only slightly, I am not narked but there are only so many words to choose from if one decides to counter, I regard this post as more balanced to a response.

Cheers...

A disciple of no-one Banbury but detail was more accurate than listed relevant to the level of research.

You're not trying to distract from a number are you? : )

Also your speculation on mood is tosh as you know - just part of if you haven't got anything intelligent to say, make a bit up - without any knowledge.

Yep, was from this morning, on London Stock Exchange, now seen the full details, the detail by ADVFN was just summary of recents - haven't searched their live data.

Thought it could be that, ADVFN listed it as two hours later.

Typo Helpful, 13:49:35 ?

08:38: Banbury - your final paragraph is false. No aim companies were mentioned in his article - as he emphasised in an early part of it.. He is not always right about everything but emphasises that his articles aren't advice - the balance of his writing is more sensible than the mass of your drivel.

... they had to have "activity on the ground"(minimum license conditions) equipment got on to the ground and a quick start was achieved. Could be wrong on this last bit but I have assumed that was specifically with regard to the Bilbale license re. 13/12/24.

... license ...