Member Info for NikeAir180

News, a few points...

The payment to POW is deferred to 13/09/24 if valid points are gingvto refer to t

Lots of successful people have had a dream that they have taken steps to pursue, more concise but related examples might be visualisation techniques often used by sports people but not limited to them.

My guess with a sports person using it, it should relatate to the possible and one's ability with knowledge or recognition of the opposition and hopefully further enable while still leaving room for spontaneous adaptation.

22/09/17 at 14:40 on the San Leon Energy share thread on the ADVFN forum there is a further reference to RRR's pursuit of damages in 2013. It does repeat slightly through the scroll down but is a better exposition in most respects than what I referenced in my previous post and it also includes the cited perspective of an Internet lawyer.

I can understand the rationale for referring to that situation but if... anyone does so, it should be respectful and subtle in my opinion, am not saying that hasn't been so in the last several hours, I can't see enough posts to check while writing this but if deemed necessary to refer, please maintain subtlety.

Thanks...

According to a post in this forum, from 20/07/18 at 17:53 money received went to The Build Africa Charity which was doing work in Uganda and Kenya. if it was 2013 when RRR received the payment, they had a couple of commercial sources of income at the time and were better capitalised so could probably afford to be generous. The damages were pursued because attempts to get an apology and retraction weren't working, the compensation settlement required apology and retraction - which were provided.

Reputation needed to be restored and was the primary motivation but not money. It seems like a well esteemed charity so perhaps some good did come out of it.

Because today's RNS was referring to £20000 and not about half of thst amount which would be similar to 20,000 Austrailan dollars or alternatively similar to approximately 40,000 Australian dollars, with quite a lot of rounding.

Re. Additional Heads of Terms from POW RNS on 13/03/24 - possibly as you say Specinvestor99 if POW and RRR were both each paying 20000 Australian dollars per month and then RRR were paying 40000 Australian dollars or was 20,0000 the combined total such that RRR was solely paying 20000 Australian dollars afterwards?

Either way it might be as you consider, it might be as News imagines, it might be another reason.

In one place it is winter, in another it is summer, but hopefully today refers to a good place.. : )

I think it is possible News because it is not impossible and because I do believe in the possible I should be mundane enough to clarify 17:10 from me should have had a ? and not a , in fact I just cleared up a conjunction earlier...

Well, we will just have to wait and see. : )

It remains consistent with earlier official comments that RRR have the support of major shareholders, I appreciate Banbury liking the ISA limit coincidence re. allowance for each new tax year, I like the coincidence that the value on the said day of 31 million shares sale or 32... as it may have been a mistype, is close to that figure and quite fair enough.... Theeeduke is still in banter mood.

Bon Weekend...

Can't be you then Theeeduke, given possible interpretation that you sold.... higher price, at least 31 million shares out of an earlier 32 million buy on the 29th July.

Can't be you then T

If we look at the RNS' of RRR and POW on June 12th 2024 we see three crucial points but not a fourth point, that might have referred to £250000 payment two months after completion and that is the flexibility I am implying, which is perhaps a difference to the RNS' of 13th March 2024. To my mind a flexibility had since been applied and flexibility has been proven with the payment date put back to 13/09/24 this suggests a good relationship between RRR and POW and so by reference to June 12th 2024 it is not "extremely embarrassing" as stated at 12:39pm by Zumore.

Hopefully not, perhaps just his normal self... with reference to scepticism and "only".

... which was also responding to 23:34 on 15/08/24.

10:05 - 31/07/24, 09:32- 30/07/24, 11:38- 29/07/24 posts by Theeeduke are relevant to my 00:49 response to his 00:24 and 00:21 comments on 16/08/24.

I misquoted walletinvestor 14 days maximum, it was 0.0541, the other details I have quoted are correct and the paragraph summary is worth a read... but I am not endorsing either contradictory perspective.

Your maths is off specinvestor99, looked like more than 60%decline to me and based on that 1 year figure and if you had scrolled down on the link you had provided you would have seen they consider that it will be a 96.371% decline. However if you scroll further down still to the summary paragraph walletinvestor says the AI analyst thinks there could be a posive outlook for the stock and in the next sentence walletinvestor recommends it for portfolio.

Now can you see the inconsistency of predicting a 96.371% 1 year decline and also recommending for portfolio purposes while also expressing a positive outlook for the stock? That to me seems contradictory and unreliable for this particular stock.

It also suggest a 14 day maximum price of 0.052... and says it will not go higher than that. Shows the weakness doesn't it. Emphatically good news could turn such a prediction on its' head, of course that might never happen but it could happen today, next week, in 12 days, the certainty of the comment supporting the 14 day maximum price is unreliable.

For obvious reasons RRR might be news sensitive but WalletInvestor AI analyst doesn't think so for the next 14 days.

You cited the Oxford English dictionary to News as justification of using the WalletInvestor negative share price prediction but that definition was predicated on the analyst being a person and, therefore, human. WalletInvestor machine learning AI analyst is not human and lacks professional qualification.

If you think RRR is best analysed by walletinvestor algorithm and predicted share price on that basis is of worth that is your perogative specinvestor99, one caveat, I never paid for the premium service, I'm only referring to true details with three stocks searched for on that website.

Over and out.

Let's actually do your claimed 32m shares trade(s).

The share price was going up that day Theeeduke, you popped in and exclaimed with enthusiasm that there was a 32million shares sell. Helpful got annoyed with probably because he thought you were trying to attack sentiment, cause a couple of jitters.

I accept what you say is possible.

Okay so you later said you made money on the short term volatility that day, one day trade by yourself.

You are now saying you bought and sold 32 million shares in the same day. Not impossible..

Your 32 million shares trade didn't show up on this broker's share price trade records, I presume it corresponds quite well with trades on the London Stock exchange, I know for a fact it is not just trades for this broker's clients. There were one or two 38million share trades that showed up that day if memory serves me correctly.

Perhaps the 32million shares went through the Aquis stock exchange, but saying that I don't think RRR are on that one?

Not all trades show up on Londom South East share price trade records, plenty do...

So perhaps someone if they really wanted to could check with London Stock Exchange with regard to the day you said you made those trades.

I understand your reasoning for your tactics if you did do as you say, the amount of money involved would presumably have been putting down £16, 17, 000 maybe a bit more on quite a good day for RRR in recent times, could have been close to £20000 to risk that day but yeah... maybe you did.

Not "reviewed" revived.

Walletinvestor... one word...

Machine learning artificial intelligence... analysis , not an analyst, a lot of crypto stuff a lot of stocks.

Inconsistent, some price predictions with one stock I know quite well plausible for a a tin stock. A gold and silver early stage producer, time I had it never went much above 80p walletinvestor predicted £26 per share, when the shate price dropped a fair bit bit below 80p it predicted £13 per share - no I never believed those predictions - ultimately it ran into operational problems going, one quarter... in the wrong direction they had expanded the mine when they had to much debt to make that mistake at a time of high interest rates, company folded, mine has not been reviewed and no sign yet that it will, there is good gold and and decent silver there.. Point... have seen it with other stocks as well... walletinvestor sometimes has very unrealistic upside and downside predictions over five year periods, it can't understand the story... only some technicals and I think it offen severely over-estimated positive and negative trends in some of the volatile stocks, possibly biased by crypto analysis and that high volatility.

Just come back to me, there was a mid tier holding company, I have had the stock and I used to know it well, the price is good now, it was weaker at the time but not too bad, was rebuilding at a time of general economics challenge, walletinvestor was predicting complete failure for the stock! Nah, it's doing fine, mid tier, growing and developing it's dividend after restarting it, the details stated are on quite a recent check, if I find them to have changed I will clarify within the hour.

Suffice to say walletinvestor is a very unreliable and unknowing... predictor for Red Rock Resources.