Member Info for NikeAir180

15:58... Acknowledging typo... third line from end.

Helpful did buy some shares in RRR recently, think it was slighty under 0.05 and did confirm that on this share chat and News has provided no evidence to say he is invested via credit (rather than purchase of shares) to support your statement, specinvesror99. I believe CLN's are another type of investment in a company, my exposure is only via shares.

Re. 15:45, each each decision taken by myself will be on what suits my circumstances at the time and how I read different stocks, how I regard their short, medium and long term future.

Acknowledging typo at 15:34, heading of the post referred to was: "No Opinion", the comment was more decisive, I did regard it as plausible but knew better than to follow another poster's advice, sold some when it dipped to 140% on the 29th July after the first high that day which was still a good decision though not the best timing that day, a small stake, from a moderate stake is maintained.

Re. 15:15: the dates I referred to are correct but there is one detail I have to correct - there was actually no caveat from AimDogs that it was in his opinion re. the 11:58 post on 26th July 2024 on UKOG, the heading box was no opinionion but it was worded like it was an instruction "Take your profits" and a non-clown face.

... It is possible to listen to AimDogs and follow his sequence if of presentation or consult the chronology of RRR RNS. It is not impossible to seriously regard both, I concentrate on the chronology of RRR RNS rather than the timed humour of AimDogs.

AimDogs on Friday 26th July 2024 - with the caveat that it was his opinion - told people to take the (moderate) profits in UKOG that day. On Monday 29th July 2024 UKOG shares had an intraday day high of 200% dipped a little and then rose back up to about a 200% high.

It is possible to listen to the wisdom of AimDogs and also note a few days before 26th July (think it might have been 22nd but will correct if necessary) AimDogs said on the UKOG forum it looked good for shorting.

The chronology of AimDogs' Ukog posts from those comments, lateJuly, all show how opinion is likely to change when the facts change.

Re. 13:01, Relevant RNS' are on 20/09/23, 15/11/23 and half-year report on 28/03/24 which states the lithium is currently being stored in Beira and Harare.

The chronology of these three publications starts with reference to potential buyers in the September RNS, price dropped and lithium is currently in storage before there were any sale commitments as per the mostvrecent half-year report. Best to read all three...

Thanks for further clarification Helpful, think I have either read it on a neighbour link, or maybe read something too quickly re. shear zones. Good to have the reminder that technically... there is multiple interest in RRR's assets.

Will catch up with other posts quite a bit later...

Thanks Banbury, correct... looks like I was mistaken on silver - so far - in RRR interests in Coted'ivoire, but also true we don't know everything that's there yet...

Re. My silver question- I might just email the company that question at some point... as said thought I had read something to do with one of RRR's interests but... I might be mistaken, I might have just read it on a neighbour link, there is an outside chance I've done something doofus and and read shear zone as silver zone but think that is unlikely.

Gold remains interesting...

Well as I remember it, I saw silver grade in with lithium and gold... it might have been something from the website that was resent, I can't see it on the RNS records but it may bundled in with something else and I'm overlooking it or it has possibly been removed.

I note there has been some sort of offer on part of the Coted'ivoire assets, I don't know if the website has since been readjusted SO I DON'T WANT something on this IF IT IS CURRENTLY REMOVED ? Question mark is to myself, my memory on this one may not be reliable enough I.e. when I read what I have some memory of, I should have made a mental note of the heading of the subject matter - geology stuff is not as easy for me to recall as conversation.

Re. 02:57 question to Helpful, thought I had seen silver somewhere on Coted'Ivoire asset where there was also lithium but couldn't find... on looking back through RNS', might have been on a link you may have sent on one of the neighbours but if you have a relevant record of that which has been RNSd or suitably publicised - think that would be intesting clarification. No bother if you don't have time, I will quickly peruse again before fully unwinding.

This post contained a rewrite by myself (not software rewright) of a barely understandable mistype which I though was relevant, even if there was an aspect of repetition.

Cheers...

About what India has recently said about silver. I read somewhere very recently that India perceives high domestic demand for silver as it is a key component in solar products and India requires both...

Fortunately when RRR EL Limon interst restarts I rember from 10 plus years ago reading RNS and reports this year, that as well as high grade gold there was (in my opinion) decent grade silver so it will be nice to have some exposure to that commodity.

To be fair gold does have some historocal industrial use and is also known to be a very good conductor of electricity.

About Lac Minerals Limited... and a memory of silver and other bits...

Helpful, I though saw a bit of silver grade on something to do with Ivory Coast assets but maybe it was just a link uouvsentbob one of the neighbours if there was some publiced in formation relevant to RRR silver grade that is quite intersting.

I noticed on the RRR presentation Lac Minerals Limited had copper, nickel, lithium diamond and tungsten within the licences by total of licences - I am not saying every license contains these or that they are all commercial but that is all intersting.

... was... not "veas" at 23:38, earlier. That was easy...

Confounded, that was funny... : )

Sorry to revisit this again, I was in a rush earlier but it veas definitely a script overwight - rather annoying... I have no problem with someone taking a critical attitude but what I had typed towards the end of 18:59 post was... twisted... not "criticised" so I later defended against the twist of 09:02.

It was on RRR's admin costs post - 17:30, 22/08/24 he made the closing remark re. ponzi. I think it is quite common these days that some specialist strategic investors who can afford to, choose to invest directly in the asset(s) as well as the publicly listed company; on occasion it might just be the asset I would imagine - in theory and not particular to RRR's interests in that specific consideration. The closing remark in the post was alson an attack on RRR so reasonable to defend...

His 09:02 post this morning criticised what I said at 08:23, so reasonable for me to correct that. I appreciate that you can do nuance Helpful, so I accept your point - with flexibility - about "prattling on".

Cheers...

The quotation in 16:59 should have referenced "mates" and not - friends. The content of the quotation - written from memory is entirely correct in relation to the meaning of the statement, one word - as detailed, was paraphrased.