Member Info for NikeAir180

Largely nonsense Banbury... I can assure as you are not a mind reader and speculating what motivates interests / another, not the first time and I'm not the only one to experience this style of critique from yourself.

I was never that interested in the lithium, I prefer indirect exposure to that commodity (just personal preference) or if direct, the company would have to have something else as well - have told you before I was never that bothered about the lithium. I only defend the storage explanation and other aspects because I know mischief making when I see it and RRR have some supporting evidence.

Now, I was around in January 2022 whether I was on this share chat or not, ditto others and whether I had yet read or seen any communications regarding Mussoni, I know such stuff can be complex, should not be expected, delays are normal etc - just aspects of common sense, reading, observing real news, matters of interest outside of here and anyone who has ever had to commercially, on a personal matter, deal with solicitors will know process takes time, at their pace e.g. steps to getting a mortgage and so forth. Doesn't matter what the subject is: process takes time, lawyers have to get it right in language and by stage and they might be working on other matters as well.

You were quite positive for the potential of ALR, I remember reading it at the time will acknowledge your conditional "if" and I would agree it has potential, we all find some things more interesting than others.

The Cyprus Bank situation, I was not around for but I think News by research and Helpful by memory and /

or research have sufficiently explained it and I would emphatically judge the balance of their assessment over the bias of your, woe is ahead, critique.

Are you making stuff up? Aimdogs.

That is how mining licences work, one company gets mining licenses because a) they beat competitors to it or b) there were no nompetitors. Reasons to grump about that... I don't see.

He may or not have met him, referred to "conversation with the head of state", conversation doesn't have to happen in person, though it may have done and whilst nodding to the detail there had been conversation, perhaps the subtlety was an aspect of respect, with some courtesy.

Cool...👌

What a hoot... Nah, probably just more variety to his posting style than yourself in recent times.

Re. 11:41, each to their own style but I think the method of reciprocation is because he can.

The imminent £250000 payment to POW will be in CASH as per RNS 12/06/24 so I think the balance of cash to "tosh" is okay.

Correcting myself, ... "re". 10:37

... re. 10:47.

Also News the 12th June 2024 RNS specifically states payment of £250000 to POW two months after completion (which was probably 18/06/24) will be PAID IN CASH and RRR have the backing of major shareholders for this cash payment.

No need for an element of tosh to suggested questions for interviewer re.

Zumore, your premise for why "an imminent fundraise" would be more likely because "This was an out of the blue interview.", is flawed.

In the event of an update that wasn't worthy of an RNS, it was always likely to be via interview approximately a month after the last one. I said as much at 15:42 31/07/24 in a split reply to specinvestor99, I thought it would be within a week or two of that day. Kemche did quite an amusing commentary on that split post at 19:33 on the same day over on ADVFN.

I agree it is not that clear where we exactly are on Burkina Faso but seems more optimistic than a few put it regarding the mining license, a few weeks ago; if one carefully listens to the interview it seems there is good will to RRR and it seems Bell is determined to bring Faso Greenstone to production.

Cheers...

I haven't watched the interview yet but my guess is Bell knows the difference between chief of stafff and head of state and he may not have been as focused with whatever he may have "mispoke" re ALR. Generally, I have found his concentration in interviews to be good - where he thinks about what he says and his points are quite easily understood.

Clarifying 18:25: I was referring to the value of the costs before 0.08 and 0.1 upside scenarios, which are only theoretical scenarios as upside share price and not predictions.

Not topping up talkinto, am sitting, 0.08 in one portfolio and 0.1 in another would be good results for me. I think I am quite fair but yes I am positive but I would never advise anyone on what they should do with an investment nor what I was intending to do because I might change my mind so I don't know what I've done till I've done it.

I am not overly exposed, probably the value of a weekend away with a bit of spending money for the 0.08 upside case and the value of a a week's holiday with a bit of spending money in the 0.1 upside case. More than one basket, not all the same eggs...

My attitude to RRR is not limited by short term, medium term or long term time frames and I think everyone should do what they think is right for themselves while respecting others.

Rsesponding 17:32 post by specinvestor99...

Point 2: if someone posts as in point 2 but only in relation to information in the public domain, or for example if someone expresses a personal opinion on something that is not business / market sensitive such as, within reason what they think of spevinvestor99's points or attitude, same for other others - opinions may vary such a comment that may not have previously been in the public domain but becomes so would be reasonable as long as fair enough within the discourse and remembering the site rules.

If Helpful is reading this, he may wish to make a comment and without having a go I think he said you are sometimes on filter so I made the reference of the answer quite clear. I've something else to reply to, after that I don't intend to comment further, but don't know the future, even on that.

The headquarters of Red Rock Resources is in the United Kingdom - which many people consider to be a good place, of which Helpful, in that instance, would not be the only one.

Just because the lithium is invisible to you Banbury, doesn't mean it isn't where it is stated to be.

The Lunar year 2024 for the Chinese is known as the "Year of the Dragon". In the Western world and possibly beyond the mythical dragon creature is strongly associated with gold, I can recall "Smaug" and his horde of gold from J.R.R. Tolkien's "The Hobbit" though remember it as a sometimes recurring theme with dragons.

The Chinese positively associate the "gold colour" with dragons and consider yellow to be auspicious for dragons. On further reading I found gold was described as reddish yellow and also found red to considered auspicious for dragons.

The main source as well as memory for the above was written by a Chinese Associate Professor connected to the University of Sydney.

Have a good day...

The fourth paragraph of Other Assets section of 28/03/24 half-year report - lithium stockpile is held between Beira and Harare.

Banburyboy writes his own paragraphs.