Member Info for NikeAir180

Penultimate paragraph Banbury at 05:22: you don't know that...

Any false comment within your l

Okay... I assume it was this one which covered a few topics, so perhaps this thread and more a question of topic re. 04:36, the other points still apply.

Not sure people want to regurgitate... so let's move on to today's topics?

Which thread was being referred to from over there though? Anyway if someone claims something is a lie verses someone's recall, they should also consider honesty doesn't just involve true recall or correction after a genuine mistake - it also involves integrity, that would mean, here and there, some respect for others and for chat rules when posting messages.

Think you are expressing your belief (at the end of 22:36 News) that personal comments won't affect the share price. I am saying this in case someone isolated that comment and quotes against you and it is consistent with previous comments by you.

I believe the sports stories and celebration anecdotes and have respect where it is due, it doesn't have to be expressed, it is there. Not always less, let's say accuracy in one area means non-accuracy in another, nothing wrong with some wariness though.

Relaxing at mo, then a few moderate things to do - totally understand the nice idea of a break from here though it also an interesting phase for the company at the moment.

Cheers...

21:57 comments by myself was actually replying to blueboy1975's 20:11 comments.

Cheers...

Re. 21:49:

To each their own responsibility, to each their own choice to filter, to each their own choice to read.

From one who notes a subtle multiple of posts.

Re. 21:07: Blueboy1975 - he has previously mentioned being in the negative on this stock when asked so not sure how he he is in profit beyond potentially a brief paper profit that might not have been taken within recent fluctuations.

DRC motivator applies to a small number of years not just months so no contradiction there.

Personal guidelines are not necessarily binding rules re share price drops, thinking about a holding, how much it drops, thinking about a holding - I can't remember precisely - a small number of months ago. News reads this, up to him if he wants to elucidate, I will add that no two stocks are the same.

I occasionally read Motley Fool articles, they have quite a nice explanation of why they like to think of themselves as fools. I think News has some good areas of knowledge as a poster, sometimes his perspective might run counter to some others on here.

Cheers for now...

No worries blueboy1975, the fool had some pearls of wisdom in Shakespeare plays.

Correction 2.

The 18:43 post was responding to 18:24...

18:53 is incorrect.

The 18:43 post was actually, responding to 18:28...

Re. 18:07: Also the only person to have successfully asked for any of my posts to be removed is myself, in good time, following two seperate occasions when I inadvertently made comments that I later realised were factually incorrect.

... 18:28 was responding to 18:07.

The removed 01:16 post was reported by myself as a personal attack by Specinvestor99 towards News.

You're not qualified to suggest it Specinvestor99 with any authority and even if you were appropriately qualified you would still not be qualified on here to make that suggestion, your comment would be negated by the non-seriousness of such a person's flippant remark.

Re. 17:58: At least 16 years old for point to point horse racing - according to Internet search Pumpky, I presume it was similar in the 1990s, so I think it was pony racing which is open to 5 - 20 year old according to Internet search. 20 wins is still 20 wins, it could form part of a greater total in maturity.

When a tennis player recently retired, a BBC News 24 sports presenter referred to four grand slams victories which would have had to include a junior slam - don't think it was a mistake, a win is a win and relaxation of categories to total seems fair to me particularly when reflecting back as long as the speaker and listener both understand.

Specinvestor99, I will respond to your 16:12 post this afternoon by saying that your 01:16 post was removed at my request. I endorse News' reply to you at 16:18, first ever time that I am making it clear that I am endorsing one of his posts.

Re. 16:16, perhaps winners on ponies at a young age News, just like occasionally top Formula 1 rivals have previously raced each others as youngsters in Go Karts.

They might have had a choice, more than one perhaps but also it might have been others sometime selling shares following buys over the last several weeks - including Theeeduke, according to himself.

... There is no justification for that type of humour towards any person - which has been expressed on share chats.

Yep the one that was unacceptable was promptly reported for valid and fair reasons but also with the non- mentioned but perhaps still undestood hope no-one would continue that sort of stuff, I mentioned some of that sort of thing had been on the other website share chat but not who the poster was. There is no justification for that type of humour towards any person - which has expressed on share chats.

... not "se age" was also same age...