Member Info for NikeAir180

Fourth paragraph 11:09 - you do not know that... Banburyboy. And you shoud not publicly speculate on another individual's holding, price paid and specific subsequent future, in my opinion.

Re. 0.01 explanation from you and Theeeduke - I appreciate that re. potential 32% dilution - GM permission sought doesn't mean all potential capacity will be used - maybe, maybe not.

Re. Time I posted: no, that is not embarrassing. It didn't interrrupt flow of todays threads - as one positive.

You have been responded to by me fairly, as has everyone else.

No, not embarassed re. 20:06 - hadn't read any of the afternoon posts until well in to the evening, whether I comment or not would have mothing to do with that sentiment, more to do with whether worth it fom a time point of view, the last few ones started very late but still took too long compared to hour of day.

I had always regarded the overdue £250000 POW payment as approximstely 10% of approximate 2.5 million market cap so not fully understanding the approximately 32% of shares aspect eferred in GM letter - as I said could be something I'm missing.

Thanks to tbe general meeting letter kindly provided via link by PizzaGate it looks like a potential share issue ranging between 500million and 600million approximately of shares to cover the POW payment of £250000, think the letter said up to that amount. The maximimum amount being raised was up to £250000 so unless I'm missong something that is 500million / 600million shares approximately at 0.04 - 0.05 price range if the full capacity was used - these amounnts are only in relatiom to the general neeeting request for 10/10/24.

Re. 21:06... Clarifying concluding remark: I will vote in support of the the aims of the RRR general meeting of 10/10/24.

Re. 20:06: AimDogs, you took a rest from this website under your returned nickname following 28/08/24.

I still read, occasionally one of the share chats you have visited with your jocular cynicism in previous times. I did notice there was subsequently, a new member on a share chat according to nickname and commencement date of membership but that one had more posts than the number of posts since commencement of membership date. The poster joked on at least one occasion something along the lines of new names appearing and old. The poster did like to dish it out to someone who has also posted here and the nickname of the basher was equally memorable to your current one - sardonic humour as well but more openly venemous to that company.

I am not surprised by the latest RRR development. The two most recent comments by me, prior to this one - as well as involving correction... following a thorough re-read of the 2023 RRR annual report, are not far away from someone anticipating the likelihood of a fund raise.

How much time I am willing to spend on this chat or any share chat - whether by just reading and / or responding is up to me and generally will not be swayed by you or anyone else.

I will vote in support of the aims of the RRR general meeting for 10/10/23.

17:18 is correct.

18:25 quotation does not support the second sentence of 09:51 - that sentence is not not false.

Re. 09:51: Banburyboy - the second sentence, within your posted message, is false.

The gold price is good for Red Rock Resources because of their assets but they need to get at least one of those assets producing or enable future production to occur via other means. With the next RNS, I expect to hear something of this but with one of the asssts there are are some talks ongoing with non-disclore agreements - which I think Bell was alluding to in this week's interview with Stockbox and it seemed the interviewer understood.

That leaves us with how close are we to production? and that will hopefully be addressed in the next RNS to do with general update re. activities, if not a prediction of commencement date - perhaps a detailing of what are the remaining stages to go, before we go go.

I noticed Bell said he lost 50% of the time available because of the health of others - slightly paraphrasing and interpreting re. Stockbox interview. It did occur to me that he may have felt he couldn't spend 50% longer there to compensate for timevthat was lost because of other pressing matters.

Perhaps we will get another RNS "in the coming week" I assume the intention of that comment in the most recent RNS was for next week which would tie into "the next few days" comment at 11:28 in the most recent interview.

Re. 07:53: "...week" not weeks Banbury. One can read that 16/09/24 RRR RNS and listen to the 19/09/24 Stockbox interview with RRR were he did, as Theeeduke alluded to, say "I think" before suggesting likelihood of an update accross general activities "in a few days" at 11:28 in the video.

The above is not to say suggested timeliness will be met - just accurate detailing of what was written and said and to point out a false quote by plural - "weeks" re. 16/09/24 RRR RNS.

Re. 10:02, 10:14: At 11:28 within the most recent RRR interview with Stockbox: "in the next few days" was said regarding next update about the companiy's general activities. The interview was was on a wednesday this week, taking the words - literally I assume an update next week, though not impossible we hear something tomorrow.

Re. 19:38: Gold price pulled back slightly since a few hours ago, will be interesting to see how things unfold.

O.5% basis rate cut in US re. interest rates. Interesting... as the debate from professional commentators watching that, was largely around 0.25 or 0.5?

Gold price going up, as Helpful acknowledged. RRR has gold assets but the onus is on them to do something to crystallise value.

Haven't seen the interview yet so no comment on that. As an aside, I saw an interview recently with a generally respected junior mining industry leader and he - different person - referred to a follow up final meeting which he clearly thought was a final one in the future tense and acknowledged - in relaxed fashion - that the most recent meeting specific to what was being discussed - was supposed to be the final one. I considered him to be honest, and that some things just take a bit longer. No predictions for here but a slow down compared to a possible is not unusual both specifically and within the industry.

Good luck to RRR in trying to be a goldie...

Probably a good distinction at 17:07 mikey9997 which I am now realising might have been what Theeeduke meant at the start of 17:02.

Thanks...

Re. 17:02: Theeeduke - re. 16:40, I should probably have actually (and better technically) said: calculating within a range, but the label on the data is still a guess by the algorithm.

On another share chat, some time ago, someone much more knowledgeable than me has explained for anyone who was reading but I have also found it to be so, it may be that it guesses right more often than not -but I wouldn't know.

Before the large buy at 16:25 today, the share price of the last four "sells" had risen in price, so I don't think they were all sells as detailed. I assume most of the blue trades were buys because they were at a subsequently higher price.

Cheers...

... "The sea of red" is just a guess by the algorithm, estimating within a range.

13:37: "The sea of red" is just a gu

Re. 16:40: It wasn't "coming weeks" re. 16/07/24 07:00am RRR RNS (inclusive of Reach). The communication was sufficient, at this point in time and when it was written / published; at another point in time, I will know whether it was valid.

Https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_salad

The above link provides another source for the definition with the psychiatric context for that phrase - I wasn't ware of that context previously - when I have encountered that phrase, before, from today's user.