Member Info for NikeAir180

It wasn't a word salad but I will make it simple for you... if a poster who you present yourself as in disagreement with... receives two recommendations that doesn't mean one is from me or from anyone else on this share chat that you have referred to... your implication and you know full well what I am referring to has already been falsified and that fact will not be diluted even if there are more than two recommenations, days.... later.

Re. 12:40: The matter of fact is also provable by the alternative to that implication which has already happened since it was recently postulated.

12:29 post acknowledged Banburyboy. Whilst here, I will just point out that when a poster here is getting two likes, that does not mean one of the recommendations is necessarily from me, that is a matter of fact and you know the false implication that I am referring to - previously and recently put forward by yourself.

Acknowledging that it was actually 10:39, Banbuyboy - clearly you know the post I am referrering to, the penultimate sentence is unambiguosly false.

Banburyboy - 10:49 (your penultimate sentence is false) stop trolling...

The duster was before off shore discoveries Namibia, which then attratted majors to off shore Uganda - territites which were geologicalky connected 120 million years ago and are considered to retain similarity from that time. CEG is the only junior off shore Uganda surrounded by majors and technology, methods of exploration and tactical priorities continue to evolve.

Post whenever you like IFK (inclusive).

Thanks PAS14, I agree with you that most posters are likely to be honestly engaging, my attitude is to keep an open mind but to give people the benefit of the doubt when I think that is reasonable.

I think HFB and IFK's points have been authentic, he is knowledgeable so I do believe them to be considered opinion with a good sense of history, none of us know what will happen exactly, which exact strategy will be used. I like his balance of topical knowledge and optimism but we all have to decide for ouselves...

Cheers : )

Not sure where you are aiming that Meadow and I appreciate you are a long time holder, I have been in this one for 29 months so I can predict it will be two and a half years next month.

With regard to thanking IFK for the start of his 14:42 comment from yesterday, that is because someone had put an articke up re. that comment concerning findings from the Wood report reaching relevang ministers, political leaders (am paraphrasing slightly and will go futher) by November sounds as I remember it (but didn't have that article / brief report to check) I am naturally also including early november through the month as stuff is read through and dicussed. That is if intended timelines are maintained and decision will take time so even if concept study for Greater Sunrise with recommendation for what will best suit Timor-Leste is received by political leaders in good time, it doesn't mean decisions will be reached quickly but it also doesn't mean decisions will be reached slowly, there has already been a lot of thought and discussion.

All the best...

If VT and IFK are the same person one doesn't have to be as humorous as in previous times though all the micknames have had a little banter. The way of thinking and expressing is similar with some adaptation to new leadership and stategy.

If he comes back, I'll be pleased to read him and I am likely to continue to appreciate your posts as well, Filthy.

Cheers

Re. 14:40: I read one exchange between those two and considred it possible - if the same poster that one could have left the site and rejoined on the same day under a different nickname - could have been an expression of internal dialogue and a way of saying goodbye to a previous nickname rather than just finshing with one and starting another.

Regardless of above and other considerations it is not not really any of our business if a poster bears no ill well to this stock and posters and readers, the quality of the posts remain high just as there is often high quality to your posts.

Cheers...

Eddie, they are not new accounts, some people just don't post much, prefer to read?

I don't think his intention was to bury an nteresting article from the other week and we both had the same core interpretation, he developed his points in response. I respect both those posters and it was easy enough to read all the posts in one read through.

Yesterday I referred to a Wood led study re. Greater Sunrise development for which I think an article had previously been posted via link near 02/07/24, IFK responded via a few posts with his own emphasis but I broadly agree with him and I appreciate his reminder re. Gusmao having said they expect findings of report by November.

IFK, thank you for your posts, I have just re-read some of yesterday's. I think the duo might still be dynamic and / or perhaps have good timing but I do appreciate the 14:42 post and thank for the reminder that they expect the finding of the report on Sunrise options by November.

Thirty minutes ago a troll who does not know tried to have a go.

The 18:20 post on this thread is false.

Not the case Talkinto...

It might be less than 30% accross two wrappers though I can't be bothered to do the maths. One holdng is 54% down and haven't moved on it, other holding down 0.74% - including previous transactions average buy price is 0.17 versus average sell price of 0.16.

You should not specifically target other people when trying to reference share price decline, you should not assume people stay still when referencing share price decline and you should not assume you know the most likely share price response in the short term following the GM, I also do not know the most likely response.

... pertaining to Greater Sunrise Development...

The Wood led concept study for which engineering option - pertaining to Greter Sunride Development -would most benefit the host nation was intended to complete by the fourth quarter.

It will be interesting to see if there any further updates on that sudy within the next few weeks.

16:16 is factually incorrect but I would hold a door open for you.

Thanks...

This aritcle is worth a read if one has the time and inclination, the "shock quenching" method sounds interesting, I wish them good progress with that research.