Member Info for NikeAir180

Re. 18:41: Always difficult to know the reasons for a buy or a sell unless one is speaking for oneself.

...strategy.

Sometimes when strategy is not as easy to discern their may be tactical flexibility.

When RRR were invovlved with production from the El Limon Gold and Silver mine, they - through their operational company - did not do a full assessment of what was there, pretty much just got on with it - learning more about their asset as they started producing - when relevant commodity prices were good it was a profitable and expense justified operaration and their success with that asset and stratergy does show some of the nimbleness junior mining companies are capable of. It was an efficient way to reach profit.

The 15:47 from Banbury, does finish with a creation, of exaggeraration with false conflation.

Balancing out Zumore's negativity of 13:46 and 13:47: Elemental Altus' do hve a royalty for part of the RRAL potential gold assets, this was announced previously in a POW and RRR RNS. The royalty had previously been set up by Altus Strategies - by their leadership at the time and that company had a "merger of equals" with Elemental', which is chronlogically, why Elemental Altus... would have it now.

Helpful, do you mind reminding please which part of the assets the royalty is for, as far as I am aware the status is till the same, off the top of my head I am thinking Berringa?

Thanks

Regarding penultimate sentence of 09:40: Banbury, you don't know that, unwise to pretend you do.

Meadow, is it not London South East hosting both companies? The time slot is an hour and a half, I'm guessing it is two company chats, one after the other.

One company has a significant gas project, the other a significant graphite project.

I'm not.

To clarify my 14:54 reply, Banbury has no evidence that Helpul advised RRR to invest in Elephant Oil. By implication: no evidence RRR chose to invest in that asset because of comment from Helpful. Whatever their reason was for making their investment in that asset.... Banbury has no evidence Helpful advised RRR to do so.

Replying to Banbury's over the top 14:21 comment:

Too much supposition from you Banbury. You have absolutely no evidence that RRR chose to invest in Elephant Oil as a result of advice from Helpful.

The half year annual report of 28/03/24 states that the current stockpile of lithium is in Beira and Harare.

You will just have to wait like everyone else, one would assume, Banbury regarding your question at the end of 23:03, a perverse use of the word: threats, leading up to that, although perhaps you had your own logic.

The burger looked like a 3oz ... equivalent.

I suppose I've got to corrrect 01:12 - tiredness was affecting my eyesight as I was reading through: punctuation.

... follows , not ows.

On the positive side Eddie, Willec was a stong poster on CEG share chat against some fierce opposition - he has been correct in that JV funding has now gone through with a super major. He was a liitle bit bullish on share price upside - the timing of upside can be hard to know but good upside sometimes happens. CEG had a very good day when the announcement of the JV partner was previously publicised, most recent RNS confirmed known other investment and shares for that at a premium and it ows previous consolidation and then clarification / news re. share options.

Sunda Energy is different and already has a difference in how part of how funding is working. Both companies have highly prospective assets. Ironically a naysayer over there occasionally but repeatedly tries to convey it a weakness or negative to the positive side that Willec is not currently there (haven't read last couple of days). I don't think it is a weakness and consider it as just a variance of positivity.

Re. 19:58 Meadow's reply to Willec...

Re-read the 09/09/24 poats, no prediction of 1p by end of year. Said it would be interesting to to see what SP is like by end of 2024. He was then bullish saying at that moment, it was looking closer to 1p than 0.0075. It can be interpreted in more that one way but both by punctation and and in my opinion, content, I don't think he was giving an end of year prediction.

Re. 19:19: I was being efficient earlier, saving time.

Ten years? Wow, I once listened to one of the greatest ever decathletes who when asked what it took, said "Repetition, repetition, repetition." After the repetitions there was multiple gold.

To Helpful, Zumore and Banbury: Entrys or additions and exits or partial exits in relation to assets, in this junior part of the sector, is perhaps a difference between "clowns" and participants. The balance in some instances of short term aspects and longer term considerations is part of what participants will sometimes think about and I bet there are some wise clowns around.

Cheers : )