Member Info for NikeAir180

00:57... Zumore, you seem to be putting forward a theory based on the balance of likelihood as you see it but I don't think it has the quality of "near certainty".

The RRR rns you cited refers to a date 15 days earlier than what you draw your oinion from regarding the major's RNS and smaller companies could also have mutiple assets in the country, possibly by region.

RRR communications suggest they think the asset went for more than previously thought, I think they will have more up to date information than you.

Zumore, I don't consider you to be a lawyer and if you were, you would be unlikely to comment on such matters on this share chat. Neither you or anyone else posting, knows how the future is going to unfold with such matters.

Cheers

The majkr has exposute to.loys if assets in the counyry and I think some smaller companoes will have exposure toutipls assets in gbe country and perhaps regions as well. It is impossible to know forr sure what the re-sent RNS was specifically referring, you seem to be putting forward a theory on t

21:59... Not all regulated public information related to companies predicts the future - that would depend on content and I acknowledge philosophically - the world is unpredictable, in my opinion.

Seems to me Zumore that you are disregarding half of the major content of Orslega's reposted message from Helpful and you are mixing that deliberate disregard with aimed suppostion.

The second RNS that you included has no direct evidence to support your opinion.

Wit regard to the youtube video, we know things aren't easy but according your previos statement you have deliberately ignored the most recent videos posted here from X.

You are not as up to date on context as some. Context alone cannot, with authority, accurately predict future, neither can Zumore even though you have previously tried; unless there is also sufficiently regulated public information referred to or supporting, which could potentially help make a meaningful difference between supposition and reliable exposition.

Ha ha, I actually agree with that Helpful :) and it was an excellent reminder...

Maidit in the video you reposted yesterday, originally posted by Orslega, Bell refers to just before Covid, so it seems to have been 2020.

Cheers for now...

Re. 14:24: Banbury, at what point when someone falsely ascribes lies do they become the liar? At each point what might decide that matter might be intention: for consideration - someone could make a mistake while expressing an opinion, if false comment is repeated and the person making such comment is intelligent enough to understand that it is false comment, historical information is available to the contrary and tbe person has been repetedly corrected...

Most of us, Banbury, need to look in the mirror sometimes.

00:37... Aimdogs, do not put out false information regarding percentage loss or gain or no change pertaining to myself or anyone else. Even if what you might posit is correct, it should only be with permission, in my opinion.

You go short on stocks sometimes, fair enough but be wary of expressing your estimation of other people's holdings and how they have performed, regardless of what your variety of possible trading tacticts are towards towards any stock.

I understand your distinction Aimdogs and may have missed some subtelty earlier. Even so, in your post heading you have attached Bullish posters to Share Price performance, so I think you answer to me via extraction is disingeneuos. Thee is no seperation e.g. comma in ypur post heading. Myself and others have nothing to with RRR share price performance beyond the buys and sells that help to make a market.

Correcting 14:02... As for the majority of other people, as of today, you are making stuff up. You do not know how people manage their portfolios so in general such an outline is somewhe between guessing and making stuff up, ultimately balanced to the latter if written in ignorance and unaware of updates which shouldn't be any concern of yours and so are not necessary and also unverifiable on a share chat.

As said you are just makin stuff up Aim Dogs. Two wrappers for RRR, not as much difference in weight now via number of shares, I haven't moved at

all on the larger holding for months. A few bits less than 70% down on the lager holding and less than 30% down, it is around 50% averaged over the two holdings.

As for other people you don't know how they manage their portfolios so again you are just making stuff up.

Your just making stuff up Aim Dogs. Two wrappers not as much

Helpful, I believe you...

I guess you've never wobbled down a chimney, must be why I don't believe you.

Well the acknowledgement of gold prices aren't luring or rampy. RRR has exposure to gold, some posters differ on whether it is relevant exposure. Time is relevant.

Someone giving their head "a right wobble" would not be doing their brain much good. Better not to wobble then re. 20:42.

Were you getting a bit fixated at 18:42? Banbury.

It is up to whether you want to challenge posters' comments or not, perhaps more focus on the comments rather than the poster would dilute fixation, focusing on comments doesn't require a reply, each reader can choose to assess whether it is worth it.

I found the article interesting, I acknowledged that to Maidit. He already knows I often disagree with some of the content of his posts and I didn't click on the thumbs up so there was no recommendation from me for the whole post. Maidit and I get along as posters partly because we are respectful to each other.

You concluded your 18:39 post in the manner of instruction. This is your answer.

Banbury, I think you go too far forwards with your negative perception of the company and too far backwards when suggesting distinguished intelligence. The 17:10 post is lacking in class.

That's an interesting article Maidit, including one of the links I read. Five days to the budget..

Re. 16:43: Aimdogs... another creative, you are like a fly swapping lions.