Member Info for NGR1616

Two questions.
1. Any news following yesterdays deposition?
2. Is there a chance the PTAB might arrive at a finding earlier than May once they've exhausted all avenues?

thanks Matty.

Lobo 87 - Is the trial is likely to only last a week because of the PTAB ruling (assuming it goes in our favour) with a Jury decision rather than run on as the validity of the patents is thrashed out with a Jury who has no idea what Quantum Dot is?

Never had a job on the HUR board you conspiracy believing clown.

Politician concerned about the environment and transition away from hydrocarbon dependency to protect long term viability of the economy to protect against the sudden loss of jobs further down the line doesn't support my share investment so makes me wretch.

no mug will fund taking HUR to court, certainly nor Burford.....they like to win.

Countryman I can declare you are a moron.

rfarfa that's the common misconception. Yes when you burn pure hydrogen with pure Oxygen you get H²O.

However in the boiler example you are still burning natural gas mixed with air.

In the pure Hydrogen case you are burning that mixed with air. Air is made up of 78% N so you get as a bi-product NOx which can have a negative effect on vegetation and also form ozone which can further damage vegetation.

In time NOx levels would rise as CO2 levels have. There are ways to deal with it locally but as I said earlier it's not the magic silver bullet.

rfarfa without upsetting anyone and banging the same drum any longer (I think I've made my points) I will take the risk of responding to your request for further clarification. There are proposals and trials already where natural gas is being augmented with Hydrogen in a ration of about 80:20 I believe. There are obviously serious safety issues with hydrogen (as there are with nat gas of course) but also the current boilers aren't configured to run on pure Hydrogen. However even if 100% pure Hydrogen were pumped into homes via the existing gas network it's still not the silver bullet due to the emissions that result. It's just swapping one problem for another.

FatSam82 you do realise that the rest of the West of Shetlands area is made up almost entirely of conventional sandstone reservoirs (Clair has evidence of some fractured basement properties) and presents significant challenges. Only a handful of fields have ever been developed and for good reason. But you go on believing.

Easyp glad you’ve been listening to my facts and filtering the ‘believers’

Why would I need to? Plus it’s not pure hydrogen and the emissions even if it were are not good for the environment.

I’m not invested in any hydrocarbon companies. I’m in the process of retro upgrading my home to be passive or as close to achieving passive status as possible. New additional ‘warm roof’ insulation, new additional insulated cladding, triple glazing with additional glazing added for solar gain at the south elevation and reduced glazing at the north, draught proofing, photovoltaic solar panels and an air source heat pump. Gas will be ripped out back to the street.

But I work for an oil company:-)

Yeah but it’s more likely 6 well is not pumping +10k boepd

Or they simply predicted the price of oil would rise and along with it HUR!

I suspect they’ll ‘sell-out’ soon with a %holding to the ‘buyer’ than gives them control of HUR. CA will transact (give) the shares to the ‘buyer’ at a discount in an off market/off-book transaction so as to protect the share price in the process, but also at a price that allows CA to cover their position. Win win for CA and also for the new ‘owner’ as the price won’t be getting driven one way or the other as it would if CA were selling on the open market or the ‘buyer’ was trying to build their position in the open market.

Pure speculation but CA are a fund, not an oil company. Perhaps they’re in cahoots with Kerogen.

a small foot or a large foot?

wait......were the questions 1. why are you not holding shares in a stock you don't believe in? Followed by 2. Why don't you short it. My answers to both are around risk but the crazies here don't seem to factor in risk and think I'm some sort of a cat, or a duck. Not one person has put a cognisant argument forward all day with the possible exception of Daltry, who I respect. Instead its a one way diatribe of slights. Give yourselves a clap guys. Anyone looking in would think you were projecting.

please give me those questions!!!!

Please redirect those questions you refer to Dick! I must have missed them.

Fair enough. Although I'm not trolling.