Member Info for NGR1616

Lancaster can't be intervened. It can only be worked over. At great cost. Fact - not a de-ramping opinion.

True.

https://www.iflscience.com/technology/camera-the-size-of-a-salt-grain-created-by-researchers/?fbclid=IwAR1CYWBPI4jAMWOtavuKjj_0ZtE4SGxFIbj1Sunu_r35FgtBtGaoHq03WQQ

Thanks Bonzoful.

have you seen the oil price?

is the PTAB happening at the regional USPTO office in Dallas or is it being run at the main office in Virginia does anyone know?

When was the last charter due to expire and when exactly did we expect the FPSO to drop the buoy? Two minutes after COP? Of course it needs a supply vessel.

You’re looking forward to a winding up order?

one day guys......one day.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/nov/18/apple-aims-to-launch-self-driving-electric-car-in-2025-says-report

not suggesting any link for the avoidance of doubt.

Because you've got bunch of dicks on here spouting unsubstantiated BS. And then others that defend it.

Elementary.
Clair - Sandstone predominately
Foinaven- sandstone
Schiehallion - sandstone
Solan - sandstone

Hurricane's WoS acreage is not homogeneous with other fields WoS.

The reason the CPR figures vary has been covered ad nauseum.

6 well could produce beyond 2024 but will it have an FPSO to produce to and will the volumes be commercially viable or will liberated gas cause problems. These are all important considerations not to be ignored.

a binary bet with 5 customers and 8 product lines and one potentially ordering in commercial volumes in 2023 and visibility of this likely sooner.

Is it any coincidence they are repeatedly reminding us of the production capacity out of Runcorn?

new note out!

if the company has a successful outcome at PTAB, ongoing licence agreements, STM comes off with recurring revenue, the other customer delivers more of the same revenue and Nanoco becomes a recognised company in other sectors too such as automotive , IoT, 5G and Solar plus medical then stick another zero on the end for good measure!

Dickbat.....whats the issue? All's good no?

Here's one for all you conspiracy theorists out there........where has this poster been all day? I'm often questioned about my motives and here we are with an important RNS and nothing. Sincerely I hope he's ok, but it looks a little fishy?

Schlemeil you are correct. They do not have the consent to produce that liberated gas.

They must therefore decrease production or cease production or come up with a deal with OGA or get the FPSO to process it and store it for offload or build a pipeline. Not many of these, except the first two, are likely.

What would happen if they weren't looking to extend the relationship? It's game over.

At least with an extension, presumably on further reduced FPSO rates, they might be able to reduce OPEX and offset some of the reduced production rates so the bubble point issue is mitigated for to an extent and extend the cash runway.

The reality is they need to add something to the current well situation which won't fix itself.