Member Info for NGR1616

You reckon IT? If it makes you feel better then why not! [clapping good on you emoji]

I think people should from now on only post what makes them better.

Mintz get paid regardless remember….

Decent early action!

I think his hare-brained suggestion is an offer for the company not a settlement. Either way, don’t take drugs kids…..

That is helpful-maybe

They will probably settle pre-trial.

Obviously I’m joking. But I’m not ruling it out during the trial.

As for media coverage there will be very little meaningful coverage until the verdict in my opinion and even then it depends on the verdict…..but if nanoco wins conclusively and implied damages (loss of revenue) can be arrived at it would be fantastic if Bloomberg were to run with it. Then every financial journalist worth their salt will pick it up too.

https://twitter.com/powerhouseeg/status/1608435460644261888?s=46&t=S-96rSmLkhhXFlkVLWmzIA

The levy has a new ‘super-deduction’ style relief to encourage firms to invest in oil and gas extraction in the UK.
The new 80% Investment Allowance will mean businesses will overall get a 91p tax saving for every £1 they invest – providing them with an additional, immediate incentive to invest. This nearly doubles the tax relief available and means the more investment a firm makes, the less tax they will pay.

I’m with Sammy on this one ;-)

Little volume to back it up though Nanonano!

See again I disagree with you. He’s more likely going early to adjust to the time difference. He’s more likely going so he can witness proceedings for himself. How will his presence suddenly alter Samsungs position? And clearly Samsung are quite happy to go to trial and so are Nanoco since they raised the case in the first place. They might ‘prefer’ to settle but that doesn’t mean they don’t want to have their day in court either.

Personally I don’t see any likelihood of a mediation or settlement pre trial but I am open to the prospect of a settlement in the latter stages.

I'll correct myself

*"doesn't make me think......."

I appreciate my posts may be causing some offence, but there's not been more than perhaps a single post of his I've agreed with. I'm a pragmatist, open to listening to alterative views and theories and adjusting my views when I have more 'data' So far I've only seen intransigence, poor judgement and zero legal knowledge that makes me think anything other than he's not who he professes to be. I await correction.

I can spot a ringer.......

Sammy88 is a modern day Frank Abagnale Jnr /Walter Mitty character and no more a lawyer than I am a reserve fire fighter, lifeboat volunteer or Pan Am airline captain in my spare time. He likely responded to being asked what do you know about corporate law with “I’m a corporate lawyer!” Conveniently.

Deliberate obfuscation Troublesome.

I heard he's going to be sweeping the courtroom floor after proceedings so Sammy will be happy he's adding value. Of course this is unsubstantiated conjecture bordering on hysterical hypothesis but lets not let that get in the way of a bit of whatifery.

Sammy88, can you tell us what town you practice law, just for my notes.....and to make sure I pick a firm in another city should I ever need the services of a 'commercial lawyer'. Is it perhaps Camberwick Green?
TIA>

Yeah but that’s not the case currently. I’m not speaking about hypothetical situations. At this time we are not in mediation.

Hardly. They’d have to be in mediation for that to apply and they’re not so anything can happen. BT could email from hooters if he wanted to settle.