Member Info for NGR1616

Sammy88 hardly as easy as you describe

In fact read this (properly) and you might get it

Market Makers
A market maker is an individual participant or member firm of an exchange that buys and sells securities for its own account.
Market makers provide the market with liquidity and depth while profiting from the difference in the bid-ask spread.
Brokerage houses are the most common types of market makers, providing purchase and sale solutions for investors.
Market makers are compensated for the risk of holding assets because a security's value may decline between its purchase and sale to another buyer.

Dark Pools:
Dark pools are private asset exchanges designed to provide additional liquidity and anonymity for trading large blocks of securities away from the public eye.
Dark pools provide pricing and cost advantages to buy-side institutions such as mutual funds, and pension funds, which claim that these benefits ultimately accrue to the retail investors who invest in these funds.
However, dark pools’ lack of transparency makes them susceptible to conflicts of interest by their owners and predatory trading practices by HFT firms.

Market makers hold stocks…..to buy or sell but that’s not simple enough for you to understand? There’s still an equal transaction when they do.

Dark pools simply avoid transparency. Again there’s still a buy and a sell but disguised.

I’m not discussing it further with you.

Did you read it? It proves nothing to support your argument and rather instead undermines it.

BS. Dark pools have been debated ad nauseam before. The reality is for every transaction there are two sides. That’s it.

Oh ffs tricky…….you don’t know anything. It might boost it but it might not. And don’t get me started on your nonsensical bit on buy/sell ratios. It’s 1:1 and always is.

And I in turn was responding to another nonsense posting. I think what I’ve learned is it’s better to say nothing rather than argue from entrenched positions.

I’m out of here until there’s something noteworthy.

The avg is closer to 900,000 P\D

LOAM would appear to be selling some.

There’s no leak.

Everyone chill

He’s Being the Banker. Exactly the same MO and a total fknugget.

My pay masters just told me to post this

"The rise is just down to speculative PI's taking a punt. Volumes are low and don't indicate anything significant. LOAM will probably sell into the rise, we've seen it all before...."

Lejjb….again? Really? Paid “trolls” by institutional investors. I know this country is starting to resemble a banana republic but this suggestion is frankly ludicrous.

Feeks…..be careful what you wish for. If there’s strength I’d not be surprised to see them sell more.

Baronet you are making some serious accusations there. In essence you are suggesting that LOAM were inside with Samsung and/or Nanoco in advance of any suggestion to the US court system that a settlement would be reached on the day before the trial as far back as the 12th of Spetember when Turcan [not sic] resigned!

Sit down and have a word with yourself.

Stt1 thé SP was in the 50p range on Apple rumours before litigation had been mooted. So it’s perhaps inaccurate to suggest the SP is entirely litigation weighted.

We really should focus on the future. This event was described by BT as the cherry remember.

Completing the settlement opens up a clearer road absent of further costs and delays in appeals that until complete can only leave threads of doubt over the validity of the IP and detract from Nanoco’s real potential to make money in the CAGR of SWIR sensing plus likely more action on display now the IP has been validated in a timely manner.

All of this suggestion of $1-2-500m could backfire spectacularly if it is in fact $10-20-50m and you’ll have all hoisted yourselves up!

Better to stop building expectations over this important but one off event.

There’s going to be group with egg on their faces after this. I’m not sure which one but if GW is indeed correct I’ll wait with bated breath for the ‘he clearly influenced the settlement negotiations with his posts’ conspiracy theories :-)))

For the avoidance of doubt I’m still holding but down to 300 now

I disagree mumbo-jumbo is speaking just that. You can’t ignore the value of £50m plus IP validation and organic growth potential and apply a share price based purely on cash / shares in issue. Muppet.

Good synopsis DW.

There are really only three possibilities here.

1. accept the settlement is on the lower side and the market is right

2.argue the market is wrong

3. The market has no clue and everyone saying they know better are correct.

Believe #3 at your peril.

This BB is now just a bi-partisan embarrassment. The more you lot go on the worse it becomes. "Trolls" "Paid derampers" "disrupters" "vendettas"

We are all entitled to our opinions but reaching these conclusions is delusional. I can't wait for the RNS confirming the figures just so this farce ends.