Member Info for NGR1616

Feeks. You are being downbeat about a settlement that was $150m not $250m……net delta of $60m or 66.6% but frankly I don’t understand the fuss.

It was a blatant message to those over-egging the settlement outcome.

Samsung have decided to up their offer to the $250 million everyone seems to crave so much which will net Nanoco an additional $60m.

But they've decided to do so under the condition that the timeline mirrors that of a trial where they mimic the long drawn out appeal process over several years at great expense in time and financial uncertainty for Nanoco.

During such time Samsung have stipulated that Nanoco can't do any business with any other company for CFQD's in the same way as their IP would remain unvalidated until a successful trial and appeal process.

Samsung want Nanoco to be under the same financial duress they would be had they won at trial but had tears of appeals ahead but said "at least they will be saved from having to expend significant amounts of time and effort to defend a genuine 'appeal' process" - see they are not a bad bunch.

The market expects that the shares will still fall to the same levels as they did anyway as the way forward is not as clear as a final settlement as agreed 3rd Feb but BT is pleased Samsung capitulated as he was worried the FCA were going to raid his house looking for Samsung TV's he got as a back hander. HH and Feeks are expected to be delighted at this much more convoluted outcome all because the sum is $250m and closer to the figure they had in their heads from way back.

Deluded. You will be wasting your time. I honestly can’t believe any rational person or persons could think there’s anything for BT to answer for here.

HH you’re losing the plot

“Guidance”.

If the award was $250m would that make everyone happy? Net to Nanoco it’s only an extra $60m. It’s not exactly peanuts but similarly it’s not $000’s of millions either.

Time to move on folks.

BT told you in an RNS that the outcome was going to be at the low end and based on income not revenue. This was prior to the RNS detailing the settlement. Referring back to what he said before the RNS of the 9th is irrelevant.

HH you need to take a break. I’ve only read two messages and I think you’ve become unhinged!

No it’s valued higher

What do you say about this now? How do you spin that all their paid efforts to lower the share price so their paymasters can buy cheaper have now cost a loss of 30%???? Just proves beyond doubt that those supporting that view were fully paid up members of www.conformationbias.com.

No. Runcorn recommissioning interests me

This is what matters now

“ Continued successful delivery of technical milestones throughout the Period for the European Electronics and Asian Chemical customers.

· Increase in demand for volumes of development materials.

· On track to deliver two fully validated production materials for use in infra-red sensing.

· Manchester exit and Runcorn relocation delivered on budget and slightly ahead of time.

· Runcorn CFQD facility re-commissioning alongside recruitment of additional production and production support personnel.

· Focus remains on delivering production ready facility and validated materials in anticipation of production orders in CY23.”

You can be sure they are leaving Dodge

Did we get over $250m? Was it $1bn like Sammy88 said?

Great synopsis Sammy88. I can see now that you are a great lawyer as I’d never have thought of this.

TF does the Royal Horticulture Society have to do with things?

Stt1 thé RNS being issued triggered a decision for them to derisk. Into a rising share price.

Why don’t you write to LOAM and detail your accusations of insider trading?

LOAM hold 39,000,000 shares………get a grip.

Sammy88 what do you think would happen to the SP if they tried to sell out quickly? They buyers would not match the sales unless the price crashed…..