Member Info for Newuncle

Since the last regulatory news release updating shareholders on the 25th March 2024, the company advises that oil sales revenues continue from CT1H and net oil sales (gross minus taxes and royalties) for February totalled US$48,470.26 and the Company expects to bank another US$37,083.16 around the 21 April for March's oil production, which was curtailed by intermittent pump and generator issues. Working with our partners these issues have now been resolved and we look forward to a full current month of production, we are currently on track to see revenues above US$45,000.00 per month once again.

Less than 1p

What about you?

10% = 2 bopd per well

😂 you don't know do you

Prove me wrong then

PPP drilled one Texas well that took 6 months to get going and delivered 20 bopd

Get that into your thick skull

Zag

GL getting any sensible answers from affirm

He is clueless

PPP drilled one Texas well that took 6 months to get going and delivered 20 bopd

He will go on about 30 wells of course like the fool he is

Says the most desperate poster here still living in July 2024

Looks like the no voters feeling the need to dominate this BB again

Are they worried because it looks that way and reality kicking in that lunn is the real deal.

Poor affrm is trapped in July 2024 endless whining now about it's not fair and I want my money back. Texas this and Texas that endless repeat of out of date information. He is going to be so much miserable when the yes vote delivers the newco for genuine investors here

Delta even the trolls should understand that explanation but they won't accept it

Well at least Wayne has confirmed he can write off the £50 he has at 10% of the original bet he made on PPP shares, no wonder he's happy voting NO, just like many of the small time holders who will be happy to write off their PPP shares by voting NO and see the PLC never return.

Funny how the smallest holders have loudest voices on voting NO, it's because they had nothing to lose in the first place.

I agree with most of your post, thanks.

On the subject of the seller, I think it's much simpler, its most likely to be Sanderson Capital who took part in the 0.35 placing and went above 10% holdings.

Not many of those type of players want such a high % level of exposure to a small cap yet to deliver plus they could have been cashing in from recent highs in 50s and 40s and made very good returns in short order. The more recent sells could be just the remaining shares from larger line of stock they placed with a broker to dispose of hence the relatively high value/volume trades data on the sell side we have seen. I have seen similar actions elsewhere as these type of companies reduce their exposure and take easy/quick profits into their books.

Just my view though fwiw

Kat,

Just asking as I never did trust the the Semnet numbers being bigged up by GTS actually....otherwise they would have never needed to go begging to the market for discounted fund raises

Please engage brain before going on the attack in future......

Kat wtf you on about re Semnet $36m contract? You saying it was perhaps "misleading" or "overstated" or sumfing else iffy about it?

NCF,

I disagree with using the term "idiots"

Should be replaced with Pointless Potless Poster Idiots

The Pointless Potless Poster Idiots obviously had FA real money invested in the first place and only voting no because they would only lose a few hundred quid anyway. By telling everyone they will Vote NO they can pretend they are Big Time Charlie Big Potatoes Players when they are Insignificant ants in reality.

You mean like Evans did ?

Well you should be.....of course there is that much BS posted on this BB I doubt anyone believes anything posted they don't agree with in the first place.

Gotcha again 😄

Why?

SM,

Please explain your source for that comment