RE: Liquidity11 Apr 2024 17:38
Duke,
I have decided that the only reason that I can see is that perhaps what Banburyboy said could be correct ie disgruntled past holders of RRR. However, it is also then possible that the disgruntled now DONT WANT OTHERS TO BENEFIT if this stock recovers, IF, there is, NEWS to justify it as norm. Or, the disgruntled want to WARN others off. THERE HAVE BEEN WARNINGS GALORE. THE ONLY PROBLEM IS MM'S WONT MARK RRR SHARES DOWN TO 0.05P , THE 1/2 BILLION ISSUANCE PRICE but the BUY IS STILL 0.06p and to sell had gone up since the morning at 0.086p.
The jury is out as to what happens next ---and with all co's , it will depend on what news comes next as norm. UNFORTUNATELY, THE MM'S ARE NOT LISTENING TO THE DISGRUNTLED going by the share price NOT MARKED DOWN to 0.05p. As for liquidity, per Talkinfo, refer it to A.Bell, Chairman and what he said on Twitter since I did know there were "shorts" re: RRR stock of the synthetic type ? Yes, No. But do email/ring the MM's if not happy as to why they are not marking RRR shares down. Might be enlightening given there are a few MM's of RRR stock dealing. I dont know as I dont have L2. Hope that clarifies. Thur, 11.4.24 @5.33pm