London South East | The UK's favourite investor portal.

Yes, Maidit308 : Yes, something that is positive for those who have gone from 10p to 1p. Can also go from 1p to 10p.

BOTH SIDES of the story unfortunately. Helpful said; PRINCIPLE: RETURN TO MEAN. That is what I mean by DONT JUMP IN WITH LARGE SUMS dreaming its going to turn into some fabled wealth. Hence, why I said I dont invest large sums for risker AIM stocks. A modes amount is SUFFICIENT. I did not dare to type up what the chap said next in the rest of the same post. He said IF IT GOES TO £5, THEN £400,000+ from the current 6p. If at £5, it would be a big mkt cap as currently it is £307.97 Million @6.05p. THAT WOULD REQUIRE

I just read one poster on the Havieron gold project on this site and I cite verbatim:

"Hi... I PURCHASED £502.66 WORTH of ....shares MAY 2018 at 0.582p.

6 YEARS LATER, AT 6.10P, -------UP 1,008%= £ 5 , 067. 46.

At say....

And by the way, I have it on good authority that lightning can strike twice. Link given to britannia, can lightning strike twice at the same place."

LOL: MORAL OF THE STORY:

First I checked the posters London South East profile and yes, he did register with this site 10 years ago. Yes, the share is currently 6.1p. I CHECKED GOOGLE FINANCE for max share chart and YES, CONFIRM that in May 2018, the share price was 0.57p.+ So, it matches. Then, I looked at PAGE 1 of this chaps posting history and a very nice and pleasant guy, no bad word to say of the co or CEO, call others names, bitter , etc. MORAL OF THE STORY: There is no need to PUT IN BIG MONEY IF THINGS GO RIGHT. Losing £500 will not appear to be a disaster as eating beans and toast will save it back in no time kinda of thing. THIS IS THE PAUL JOHNSON & A. BELL RESTRUCTING CO that went on to a fabled story of success. I did not get in at 0.58p. Why? Someone told me to look and they were talking of gold camps in Ernest Giles. Camps? Yeah, deposits here and there but NOT at 1 place. Newmont didnt want to JV and the price fell but Newmont later said they will drill a few holes for them kinda of thing. WATSON SAID somewhere else, there is NOTHING OUT THERE BUT SAND. LOL , turned out right. So, far NUTHIN but then Watson is a prospector and an Aussie and he bags licences to sell. I dont tend to buy when there is nuthin. I go for drilling results ie a catalyst which is safer but I DONT GET THE UPLIFT the same as someone just buying in blind. There was a MIS-PRICING BECAUSE FOLKS CANT READ DRILLING RESULTS and therefore by the time, Newcrest JV in, or Australian press plastered it in The Australian, the leading newspaper in Oz, it was too late then and the rest is history. Why? Jump in late, can revert as Helpful said to mean if worst case scenario.

So, this chap may want to hang on and if it turns up again ie lightning strikes twice ie if they can get Havieron going, then of course it can improve or it can revert. So, as I said in LIFE, look around SUCCESSFUL FOLKS - they dont have certain characteristics and their life seems more blessed.

NEXT SILVER: This same chap posted on a silver stock on this site. He said: "..stock GROUNDED AT 0.12P BY HEAVY IRON CHAINS! Not much of a binary choice for an investment for my GRANDCHILD WORTH A PALTY £400 now!! If it can survive it needs to get back to 3p within the next 9 years." [This stock he says went from 0.3p to 3p.] Again, not bitter given that this silver play is in Mexico from recall and it was common knowledge the gov was saying they want to nationalise etc.

Conclusion:

So, ye see, it is a matter of not plunging in. It was unfortunate about the silver stock. But silver in the bear years went to

Yes, I am aware that it would have been covered. However, on Twitter, it is still of interest under the Mexican thread and there is nothing new yet as to how Ganfeng is proceeding. However, interesting, REM plc is doing its own thing.

I thought I would review Sonora, in particular and in general. I have thought further about the 5p REM party in London. LoL, I didnt attend. However, DL said that he would make a chess move. YES, THAT DID HAPPEN - REM offered £1 for BCN @Sonora which was turned down. But it was BCN that told the market that before it could be announced by REM. I note that over at BCN forum [now no longer exists], the chances of them voting for REM was almost nil. Why? My word, some leading characters from this forum were over there d...iiii REM & DL. Meanwhile, even Seeking Alpha an American site was impressed by DL's obtaining a TESLA off-take. Why? Who has heard of a tiny AIM co being able to obtain a Tesla off-take? A/c to Seeking Alpha of which I posted the link to and seen by some, they said that FUNDING was not going to be a problem. Funding as in capex etc. Cut to the chase: DL's Tesla off-take deal was REJECTED by the BCN folks per DL on Twitter later. I sent a Twitter article that BCN & et al [the major] was going to SUPPLY TESLA!!! DL replied on open forum on Twitter to say, that was the same deal he got at Tesla. DL said that lithium M & A was around $400m and this was during the time that the prices of lithium was pretty good. REM went from some 0.04p to 2.25p and at 2.25p, the MKT CAP WAS AROUND £90M+. So, 5p would be ========SOME £200M. ===REM PARTY IN LONDON. Fast forward, GANFENG took over BCN for US$391 MILLION [Ref: "Bacanora Lithium accepts Ganfeng's $391m TAKEOVER OFFER."- Mining.com, 27 Aug 2021. POST OFFER & NATIONALISATION BY MEXICO OF SONORA: Observer942 posted on this forum that HAD DL taken over Sonora/BCN, he would have got the MINE UP AND RUNNING. Yes, when REM was just a shell, the drilling was done very quickly and DL worked like mad. Also, had DL not done the Scoping Study for their part of Sonora at some NPV $1bn, then today, KDNC would NOT be able to speak to the Mexican govt. Why? No valuation so that was also what Seeking Alpha said was a good move by DL. MEXICAN TREASURY REPORT; SONORA IS OFFICIALLY VALUED AT "UP TO US$600 BILLION." I posted that on the KDNC.L page with link. BEHIND THE SCENES: That one will never know but suffice to say £1 by REM was rejected but some 45p from the major was accepted by BCN. Today, the Mexican govt has given the official reason [per their account] that BCN & major did not "PROGRESS" Sonora [exact wording more detailed] but the govt did not agree that a road or starting to build or clear some trees or whatever meet the criteria of progress, so called. BUT IF REM GOT A MINE GOING, IT WOULD BE HARDER TO TAKE IT, AS UNDER INT. ARBITRATION, THE SUMS INVOLVED WOULD BE BIG ie compensation if the govt lost. So, just posting what final conclusions I have gather

Part 4:

MR ANDREW BELL, CHAIRMAN OF RRR.

Mr Bell has seen many cycles. The good one was in 2010. |Paul Johnson recently tweeted that with the 2010 commodity boom [think he mentioned gold as well], RRR went from 0.25p to 23p. This is the 1ST TIME I have ever heard Paul mention RRR given I have listened to his interviews. I only heard on forums what gave him a life break ie at RRR.

So, I gave the stats from the last boom and how Canadian juniors went up in tandem via Casey Research. So, Mr Bell is into this period again of the price of gold having hit the NEW RECORD ALL TIME HIGH OF US$2,400+. Mr Bell is facing quite a tough task ie taking on the DRC and a major. This is not as easy as it first looks and never is. But looking at AVZ, there is much to look forward to but RRR will need to survive this period. Litigation will not be a just walk in the park but will take some time from the ISCID cases seen.

In earlier years, co's have to change to the rising commodity. Even Paul Johnson's new vehicle has been now rationalised but what DIRECTION will his co take? That is awaited as a new CEO may be now appointed. It depends on what is the direction going forward. DL's REM also has had to rationalise. So, painful as it may be, there is not much choice. If money in cpaital markets is not plentiful as DL said in his RNS @Rivergold, ASX, then a new approach will mean that today's rationalisation must withstand tomorrow's new situation.

Mr Bell is no different and the grips against this CEO or that CEO is unjustified. Why? EVERY PROJECT is only as GOOD on its merits. So, the grips is that people just follow one particular CE|O thinking every co is paved with "gold". To those who understand dogs or horses, they will know that A PARTICULAR TRAINER'S HORSES will NOT ALL WIN nor a JOCKEY win every big race. IT IS AGAINST THE STATISTICS.

SUNDAY:

No, I will not be replying further to the Chief here. The reason why I want to take a back seat is because I dont want to get caught up in this CONTINUAL REPEAT CYCLE of the same old thesis of which there are LOTS of HOLES?

As said, think carefully, and come to some sort of rationalisation of one's own portfolio. I have.

On the other forums that I have just visited ie 1, they are not concentrating on the co or the CEO but rather how to save themselves from fiat vs assets in particular or in general. COST OF LIVING CRISIS has caused many to discuss in co-operation and there is good-will amongst the MICROCOSM.

Sunday: A time to relax and there is lots to follow up. WITHOUT ASKING SOME PERTINENT QUESTIONS, and just jumping in is the thing that is most risky. So, I will go to the other forum to see if they can come up with pertinent questions or they are just going to jump on the wrong notion/s.

PART 3:

PLAUSIBILITY:

Zumore lost his wife per Helpful informing me due to investing in RRR. |Helpful said this was posted hence the upset. So, I look at plausibility for example. Many women, unless they are professionals in their own right, have no financial status to be able to leave so easily. So, on the plausibility testing, it would not be that plausible that every last penny went into RRR, hence the upset? During the time I was on this forum, Zumore informs me that his FAMILY IS THE 1ST FAMILY of UK. So, again, some dis-connect here between 2 time periods. So, I take it, that it may be or may not be but that is personal to him. But the justification does not seem matching and conflicts between 2 time periods. Theeeedule said he mortgaged his house etc and told Mr Bell, Chairman of RRR that on the phone. However, in more recent times, he said he put in £500 etc. I took a quick look at duke's posting and I saw he told folks there, HE'S ALL IN at GST? LoL. As I said, if Duke telephone me, one would have to check the RRR share register. That is taught in the office. I am not interested in folks personal lives but when they give justification relating to their upset with RRR, then one has to look a little more closely at the plausibility one is taught in school, to see, on balance it could be or could not be, with 1% swinging to each side.

AIMDOGS

Very pointed and to which I have respect for. YES, A VERY GOOD mention of GOLD but compared to LITHIUM is not suitable. In terms of lithium, there is more to the story. I wont go into details as it would take too much time. So, AIMDogs has brought up a good point but that is already ANSWERED by the experts. I wont go into detail but IF THE EXPERTS are proven CORRECT, then one will see it in REAL LIFE. Why? There is TOO MUCH DEBT in the system and that has to, at some time, be rebalanced. What that will take and in what form is going to be evident shortly. Shortly as in 3-5 years time frame to see the beginning of how RESTRUCTURING will take place. It is ALREADY HAPPENING. How? Look at ASSETS vs paper money. Assets are NOT GOING UP but rather paper is going down RELATIVE TO.

RRR

It will need RESTRUCTURING OR RATIONALISATION and it is clear given DL & Paul Johnson are already executing on this.

DRC LITIGATION

One will have to await to see.

MY VIEW: I WILL BE NEITHER RIGHT OR WRONG. Why? It depends now what will happen and how things are run or rationalise and whether the DRC matter can be resolved in a time frame that RRR will survive. ALL CO'S ARE THE SAME, not just RRR.

AH, I AM HAPPY THAT MY ANALYSIS MEANS I LEAVE on the mkt opening, with a clarity. To this end, it means that I have studied the MICROCOSM here and can apply to any other forum given people fall into groups of thinking.

MY DIRECT REPLY POSED TO ME:

[1] Theeeduke: Yes, I did say I would want to leave due to such "unfriendly" naysayers of which have their own reasons.

BUT, before I go, upon MARKET OPENING, Mon, 22 Apr 2024, I must review RRR, Helpful & the crowd here. It called an assessment, right or wrong, time will tell. Why? This is a MICROCOSM. To continue is to bear the continual ill will - because I WILL NOT JOIN IN THIS "GREAT COMPANY" OF NAYSAYERS.

NAYSAYERS: In general, they point out to me that A.Bell, Chairman, RRR this and that. In particular, Robin rang the Chairman & it was good Mr Bell gave him the time of day. However, Robin and others point out to me to attempt to TEACH ME A NEW WAY OF THINKING & TO JOIN IN THIS NEW WAY OF LIFE here, hence the MICROCOSM of WHICH I REFUSE TO JOIN. Why? Two aspects: one, whilst I sympathise with Robin who sounds very young, he has NOT approach ed RRR or any other co with the PRE-REQUISITE/s needed to KNOW more throughly what is the MACRO & MICRO situation. In short, LOOK BEFORE YOU PLUNGE IN and IF in, then to TAKE STOCK before losing, say 99%. In retrospect, MOST will learn OVER TIME to SURVIVE. ====RICK RULE: He was not born with a silver or gold spoon etc but in his interview he said; WE NEED TO KEEP IN THE GAME. That he explained more fully: IF ONE IS WIPED OUT, THEN ONE CAN NO LONGER REMAIN IN THE GAME ie stockmarket.==== So, it is ALL FREE to learn and IF one doesnt learn, then one has to decide whether one wants to continue in the stock market or leave & whether one can BEAT THE JUNIOR EXPLORERS ETF. I wont go over old ground but it means THAT £1 PUT INTO ANY OF THE MORE KNOWN JUNIOR EXPLORERS LOST 90% TO 99%. Those that lost 90% are those with Tier 1 deposits eg Havieron & Cascabel. SO, THIS IS ====PROVEN FACT===THAT PRACTICALLY NO ONE ESCAPED THE BEAR YEARS IN COMMODITIES. A day or so ago, KATUSA RESEARCH on Twitter put out a 10 point kinda of tweet to describe these bear years in commodities.

CHOICE: If one does not want to LEARN TO BECOME A "PROFESSIONAL" FUND MANAGER THAT CAN BEAT THE MARKET ,

THEN, IT WILL BE GAMBLING ie dont read into companies but just listen to Mr X on a forum or what the Chairman said which is continually changing. Why do I say "professional"? The stats says the ordinary investors usually lose inc day traders. So, professional because in order to beat the stock market system, one has to do better than the stats. Or the extreme end, just LISTEN as said above.

WITH RESPECT:

So, with due respect, I DONT LISTEN TO ANYBODY. Why? I was taught to THINK for myself with principles taught. This is why the ire against me. Why? I DO NOT LISTEN TO ZE Mr X, Y. No, I REFUSE. So, I will NOT BE PART of this in-group baying...But why? I was taught in school that IF I LISTEN TO THESE NEW VOISES, then be prepared at the end of life, I change to become ....that I was not taught to do. Like what? To hate on....

ANALYSIS:

That is why when I stop posting on this forum, I leave VE

Will the RRR Australia IPO get through or there is no mad rush for Ballarat drilling. Why? Another AIM co is drilling nearer the Ballarat area and there is no demand for dual listing in Australia, hence why I asked. If there is no rush for the IPO, then RRR may have to re-think and re-launch with Kilmore which is a bit more risky as there is no drilling. Hence, I mentioned trenching which is cheap and which MAKI did at Cote or FASO via the CEO GEO. Kilmore is the greater potential but I dont run RRR nor is RRR taking in my view. So, I watch to see and to also CHECK my own view. But, if I run my views with Helpful, then I can see A WIDER PERSPECTIVE. In an ideal situation, I would like a CONFERENCE CALL WITH MR BELL but I dont know there is much to glean given the interviews are very heavily qualified.

It is for this reason, I view RRR and my investment as option money and some of us like Maidit308 want it nailed down.

A lot who post on this forum are NOT POSTING with insight to the PROJECTS. Why? The RRR RNS's dont tell enough because one does not do site visits like brokers before writing a report. Helpful went into army life and he will know what I am talking about. DL did not have a military background and therefore, he did not see the critical path and where REM could be cornered. These are M & A techniques and to this end case studies are helpful. That is how Solgold has managed not to be eaten by dilution from any major so that they have JV in and taken the major share. Mather said so. But Mather uses a investment bank in Canada who's known skill is to conduct strategies to maintain corporate control. Otherwise, Solgold would have JV and got 20-25% share left and then NSR. Without stategy of the M & A type one will not survive as a co. I take it Mr Bell was not in the army and may not be quite so nuanced that the DRC will take not only legal skills but more importantly, how to outplay the opposition. AVZ's French Counsel is having a field day and already obtained an INTERIM RULING IN AVZ'S FAVOUR. How they ascertained that $105m USD was paid to buy M...lithium project is a wonder. How di they obtain that? It is not a pitch book deal but rather a private matter. Its no wonder why the interim ruling is in AVZ's favour. So, very well played. In biz, it is a skill not to be eaten by commercial interests. Eg GINA, OZ'S RICHEST WOMAN MARRIED A LEGAL COUNSEL WHO TUTORED HER and one does not hear Gina getting taken in by a more masterful legal fine print etc. I was hoping blueboy1975 that if you are a shareholder, then everyone should be heard but not the usual naysayers playbook of oh, the ceo this and that. Go to any forum and the same thing is repeated so it is a waste of time IF every forum has the same TEMPLATE. They call it the old acorns ie repeat the same lines. Hope this clarifies.

FOR CLARITY:

I dont ENJOY looking at poster's history. I have NO reason to do so. I have better things to do. However, if x or y comes on and repeats just negatives, then I have to find out [1] If the poster is only negative on this co or EVERY CO. Some go round just posting ummm umm on many stock forums and nothing related to the co. [2] People say a lot of thing eg they have been on this forum for 5 years. If ONE CHECKS and it is NOT so, THEN IT MEANS that veracity is not to be taken without questioning. No one knows who anyone is in real life here, so REPUTATION is on this site alone. Same as in REAL LIFE principle of engagement. [3] Everyone on this site or on the other site depend on the TRACK RECORD ie have they a record of hitting Tier 1? Or if they say, they are CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS, do they actually display any of the academic qualifications they say they have. It is important as they are telling folks a lot of things which goes again accounting principles one learns on DAY 1 101 eg ASSET. So, a lot of posting but VALUATION is 1 of the most important aspect of Finance qualifications. How to post on any forum or take a V IEW IF ONE CANT VALUE using known techniques investment banks use? Go into a bank and try to get a mortgage or loan. The form to fill is to ascertain assets and cash flow. So, if this is not a skill then what is there to discuss about RRR. That is why all day, it is about the past which has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CURRENT. I gave the example of Solgold in Solomon Island and Raines , Qld which was not a success and each time, the co has to try again until they hit the Tier 1 prospect. What is the use of harping on Solomon Islands or Raines and if one lost, they one jumped on the WRONG TRAIN. Simple. [4] Lastly, I dont have to CHECK ON HELPFUL. I ask about CURRENT. The down cycle in commodities means that NEARLY EVERY AIM EXPLORER GOT HIT IE DOWN BY 83% AND THEN ON TO 99% DOWN. ALL THE SHARE CHARTS SAY SO AND OIL PLAYER'S 40 CO ANALYSIS PROVES IT. THOSE 40 CO'S REPRESENT A LOT OF the AIM explorers so almost the whole lot have been covered that is popular.----------CUT TO THE CHASE, PUT £1 IN ANY OF THOSE 40 OR THE AIM EXPLORERS, IT IS A LOSS OF 90% OR 99% AND NONE ESCAPED. FACTUAL AND PROVEN VS VAN ECK JUNIOR MINERS ETF says the same results. ANYONE THAT DOES NOT WANT TO HEAR FROM ANOTHER DOES NOT PRACTICE DEMOCRACY. [3] HELPFUL HAS A FINANCE QUALIFICATION AND IN REAL LIFE IS A PROFESSIONAL. I have NEVER FOUND HELPFUL not to be up on his academic knowledge and he is not behind time on a lot of updated stuff. So, I like to RUN THING PAST HIM as I think that single chamber thinking is not good but rather bounce off a peer. That way, everyone has a say. I feel AIMDog was very pointed in his Question to me. But AIM Dog cannot see the defines of LIMITING risk, hence he asked me what I will be doing. If Helpful does not answer, then I take the view that at some time, my own view will need to be PROVEN OR DIS-PROVEN. Eg,

Yes, if you look carefully, I said that I would leave and before then, I am having a good yarn with Helpful to make sure that I have everything nailed on. So, it is Sat. Then, I fell into the MUSONI contamination news that is making headlines because 1 MORE MAJOR MINE IS STOPPING OUT. Implications of which I think Maidit308 will want to know about.

Once I have determined exactly a schedule of what to look for, I can watch on Twitter to see what is happening ie RNS etc from RRR or tweet from Mr Bell.

This is my view on matters: DL HAD to make SONORA WORK. He can work FAST - he drilled Sonora like a mad man. However, this is where it all started going downhill. He and Lord C made an agreement that DL's REM would finance the drilling since Lord C couldnt get the money at BCN in Canada as capital mkts had practically shut shop. However, what DL didnt realise was he was PLAYED by the new CEO and board AFTER LORD C passed away. DL got a CONTRACT ie OFF-TAKE WITH TESLA and Seeking Alpha said that WITH SUCH A BIG NAME, BCN/REM could GET FINANCING EASILY.

THE BOARD REJECTED THE TESLA DEAL. DL was smart enough to get a scoping study done and DID NOT TELL BCN. Then, one morning REM released the study which stunned BCN's CEO, a newly hired chap. BCN said its not their scoping study but REM's on Sonora. REM invited shareholders to a LONDON party and told them that he would play a chess move re: Sonora. HE MADE A BID OF £1 FOR BCN. BCN let it out to the mkt and BCN rejected the offer although it was a very good price. Fast forward, BCN accepted a Chinese major's offer later at some 45p + & shares another lithium project which was of not much value. MEXICO GOVT THEN SEIZES SONORA inc REM's 30% JV ie the whole lot. HAD DL NOT DONE THE SCOPING STUDY FOR REM, then forget it, REM could not take any action if there was NO VALUATION but with a scoping study, there was NPV etc so VALUATION was there. MEXICO GOVT SAID: THE CHINESE MAJOR DID NOT WORK ON SONORA but they said that they were clearing a road. The BCN people did not work fast enough but DL used to work like Speedy Gonzales. Why? That Sonora project was the break he needed so he put everything in. Failure ? Why? Easy going a person but got eaten. Later, DL found out that BCN and the Major was going to take up his plans to export to the USA which was a short distance away to TESLA!!!! This is all history of the time. So, when people are hungry per the management criteria, they will WORK THEIR GUTS OUT AND MANAGE THE IMPOSSIBLE. How did DL get a TESLA off-take is a marvel. DL showed a pic of himself at the Tesla factory. Not an easy feat and even Seeking Alpha was impressed. CUT THE LONG STORY SHORT: NOW THE SHAREHOLDERS OF REM ACCEPT THAT IF DL TOOK BCN OVER, HE WOULD HAVE HAD THE MINE UP AND RUNNING THE MEXICAN GOVT WOULD HAVE NO EXCUSE TO TAKE AND SEIZE VIA NATIONALISATION and if they did, they would have to pay through their noses of which they dont have that type of money. MEXIC

----------------Time is running on. Time for a Strategic Review-----------Sat, 20.4.24.-----------

Who is actually making the EXECUTIVE DECISIONS IN RRR? Are there a team of advisors or directors in the co holding meetings and the way forward? All the COLUMNS for action is now running late. One has to ask WHY and what is the STATUS of each PROJECT and what are the INTENTIONS for ASSET STRIPPING now that DRC has NOT YET LANDED/

So, I will do a strategic review starting from RRR AGM, 16.2.24:

[1] Is the KENYA LICENCE going to be RENEWED or is it going to be on the LICENCE type per the legal article I posted?

[2] When can it be expected or are there issues? As in, as in like before, dragging their feet by the Dept of Licencing?

[3] Is there going to be a SALE of this asset? If not, when is it going to be sold and when is the upturn coming to sell to the Chinese say , who can handle African gold assets? Are there connections to do so with the Chinese?

[4] Bilbale: Best case scenario is to continue with the ARTISANAL workings and is there test work going on?

What is the worst case scenario?

[5] Cote d'Ivore: What is happening there? Are the Canadians holding out for something eg reduced price etc?

[6] Kenya tailings - folks are interested in tailings so is that going to be sold? Again, are there connections to Chinese buyers?

[7] Zimbabwe: What time frame will the sale of the lithium take place as prices have risen quite a bit.?

[8] Is there TIN at TIN HILL, Zimbabwe since this is a hot commodity?

[9] Victoria - is there some admin delay or the Aussie's are not that enthused about another Ballarat player given that is not a hot area. Also, the intersections doesnt make the market go wild - an AIM co is not finding Sunday Creek type intersections. Are Aussies too polite to say so?

[10] DRC -delay is one of the most common and favourite legal tactics. What is going to be done as this cannot carry on indefinitely? Any change of counsel or 2nd opinion? Or a more dynamic success oriented experience counsel for DRC. After all, AVZ 's counsel is having the opposition for breakfast?

[11] 1 brain = 1 style. So, if things are stuck, then a MORE ROBUST AND DYNAMIC WAY FORWARD TO NEEDED?

[12] Why not invite the CEO GEO of Sunday Creek over since he stays at Kilmore and see what he says about KILMORE @RRR.

[13] Everything is by and by. Holders need a SUCCESS DRIVEN APPROACH AND HOW THE CO GETS THERE , ITS TIME TO SWEAT & get things moving. The market has changed and money is needed quickly.

[14] Who at RRR can get things DONE?

[15] Mr Bell is GOOD at what he does ie legals, procedural, getting licences etc but now SURVIVAL is needed. Why? BIG G like many others are cognisant that time is on their side. Crux Investor said so about majors in general and it is the small explorer that does not have the time.

[16] No CRITIQUE is meant, implied but a NEW RRR must emerge to SURVIVE AGAINST THE ODDS. There are many co's out on AIM and they have

AIMDOGS

Since you asked nicely, I will answer out of courtesy. As you know 101, never plunge ALL ONE'S MONEY into a stock. Find out EVERYTHING and EVERY VARIABLE if possible. Less room for potential mistakes then. IT IS CALLED EXECUTION.

Does one AVERAGE DOWN? Theory says NO, unless there is a CATALYST that the market will tick up via EFFICIENT MKT THEORY.

Keep one's powder dry. One has to know how much the sums will involve ie if one buy 1 share at a higher price, one will have to buy more than 1 share if it goes lower. HOW LOW is dependent on the situation of the accounts.

Meanwhile, LOOK OUT FOR CASH FLOW OR SPIN OUT OR IPO OR SALE ----that can change and turn things round. Hence, one has to know inside out what RRR has, not just spin yarns like the naysayers. ONE HAS TO FIND OUT PROFESSIONALLY LIKE AN ASSET STRIPPER [accounting terminology] as to what CAN BE SOLD, SPUN OUT, IPO'ed etc. AND MORE IMPORTANTLY FOR HOW MUCH.

DRC IS THE POTENTIAL PRIZE BUT IT IS THEN "OPTION" MONEY AND HOW RRR WILL LAST IT OUT AND WHAT STRATEGY IT WILL USE TO OBTAIN THE US$430M LOST [50.1% STAKE].

That is going to be a careful and accurate spread sheet done and no one can tell others what is the time frame as that is too variable and depends on one's own view, cals and tolerance.

Or, I just keep my option money. THAT IS WHY, THE RISKIER THE STOCK MEASURED BY THE BETA OR GAMMA, the less one must invest in a stock. Why? If £1 potentially can pay out £10, then no need to invest so much. But if a stock has potential for 30% upside, then capital needs to be more. THEN, THE VERY WEALTHY DO NOT INVEST IN AIM EXPLORERS LIKE SOME WHO ARE PLUNGING IN. Why? For high net worth, they only would put a small % for a risky stock. ALL AIM CO'S ARE TECHNICALLY RISKY AS DEFINED BY THE LONDON STOCK EXCHANGE AS THEY ARE GROWTH CO'S ESSENTIALLY AND NEED FUNDING. That is why the rich buy established BLUE CHIP INVESTMENT QUALITY STOCK THAT PAYS A DIVIDEND AND THEY ARE CLIENTS OF TIER 1 INVESTMENT BANKS WHO PROVIDE REPORTS so that one does not have to do so much work. One chap of Twitter said that he does not have the research teams so it means it is subject to more errors than a team of highly qualified investment researchers. SO, MY ANSWER IS WAIT AND SEE AND IT IS ALL 101 WHAT TO DO AND THAT IS EXECUTION OF EACH ONE PER THEIR TOLERANCE LEVEL FOR RISK. That is all 101.

Latest Share Chat

Member Info for news

Followers

Following

Posts (Last 30 Days)

Posts (All Time)

Last Post

Member Since

Share Chat Post Distribution (Last 30 Days)

Activity Log (Last 30 Days)

Latest Share Chat

Member Info for news

Followers

Following

Posts (Last 30 Days)

Posts (All Time)

Last Post

Member Since

Share Chat Post Distribution (Last 30 Days)

Activity Log (Last 30 Days)

Please enter at least 2 characters

No results found

Search results

Recently viewed

Trending