Member Info for nesty

However in theory, it should only take a serious interest from SQM, Uis pushing out some decent production with a new hedge to achievbe something like a 10p SP.

On past performance on how the market judges ATM, you have to wonder just what will it take?

Maybe it requires a end of hedge RNS, to signal the market of added income.

I serious running out of ideas.

10p, just what is gonna achieve that, I can't see the market even marking us that, without Uis running production completely on schedule & a decent JORC from SQM or BW?

This is what I don't understand, I AV management be shocking, but most of AIM listed CEOs not much better.

ATM has assets, very decent clients exploring them. Iii's on board, with new prolific ones coming along.

Yet, the SP is very stagnant. I can only recall, 1 day of a 25% rise, rest just 5%, up & down, this doesn't reflect what ATM have, so I can't fathom it out. It can't be all AV.

TBH, if AV turns it around now at Uis, great I'll be OK with that.

However, my patience is thinning, it's about time we see a plan or action, which more importantly kept too.

What AV will probably do, (I wish shareholders could approach him about this tactic), he will concentrate on LR & BW so called value

Though he'll probably skip over the disaster of mismanagement of Uis & how it's cost shareholders greatly.

Unless another RNS to come say tomorrow, this RNS will be bigged up by AV, probably to deflect from Uis.

It's a common ploy, most shareholders have rumbled him on.

He has to deliver on Uis, the question finally can he? Past performance says no.

Be a important stage, now to end of the year.

Soild drill results, but will it move the SP?

I'm more concerned about Uis, we need the short term ticked. I sense that what AV does or been doing, is utilising results at LR & BW as a side show everything is OK, when these 2 assets, nice to have are a far way off developing the SP.

The only one which can do that is Uis currently, which is why AV, has to start delivering.

All IMHO.

Interesting.

Though BW recovery could be more straight forward, especially if ACOM involved, would they have higher spec technology, would that make a difference, along with higher Tungsten prices?

I have no doubt, that AV will be using lip service to shy away from any detrimental negative notes at Uis.

I know actually hoping for something in relation to ATM, often leads to disappointment.

However, I do hope there is some meat (news) on the bone at this forthcoming presentation.

Ideally, be some RNS prior, possibly about the SQM Lithium results at LR, so can be more discussed / highlighted at the presentation.

TD2 , there is that question of AV.

Though with BW, have we had detailed JORC of what is actually there yet, in what amounts?

I am sure the market isn't ready to mark us up on BW, just yet. The days of being valued on a pit in the ground are no longer.

All IMHO

I have always said that I don't mind waiting as long as it comes good.

However, I didn't expect to be pushing the limits of my 5 year plan ending 2027, but even it got a 10p base, I think that would appease some investors for the next stage.

AV must deliver now, especially at Uis, as everything else is set for the macro environments.

I agree, I am hoping that things are starting to fall in to place, it has taken quite a while, but as I said, LR and BW are being driven by top flight companies, fortunately not AV, Uis on the other hand!

I hope so, we need some news to kick start this properly.

TBH, the assets are what keeps me here.

Uis needs work & under AV control, that part concerns me, as AV business sense leaves a lot to be desired.

However

It what another poster said, which struck a chord with me, what I was thinking.

What is there for AV to screw up with LR & BW. It's the quality of the operating companies, which will determine & prove the assets in time with results. Hopefully AV will have less involvement with them. If you know what I mean.

Another bonus is the new shareholder.

Let's see what the rest of the year turns out.

TD2 this is my concern, you can have great assets, but if the management is poor, can the potential be achieved.

TBH, 10p would be a profit, but is it worth, ie just about a bag at these levels for the amount of time you have to wait in relation to ATM and AV timescales.

The assets are not disputed, what is disputed is how they going to get fair value in the short and medium term, this would have to come from Uis, as being valued for a hole in the ground doesn't count anymore in today's market.

The question is can they do it, otherwise we relying on the likes of SQM or ACAM, to under pin value, in terms of an offer, but I would think that would be 2 years away.

Harchris, before we started mounting all the debt up, I had a target of 20p, TBH, I'm struggling to see apart from a TO, how it's gonna get to 10p.

I'm 4 years in here, due to the past performance of AV, I'm struggling to see where & how he is gonna change & actually deliver.

Richy is the new investor have any CEO experience, we need a change.

I have to say the last few weeks of ATM I am considering my holding and limiting my exposure.

AV words this particular stuff, like he doing shareholders great service.

We not asking for much, just for some progress in certain projects, it just seems every RNS has some cash raising to it.