Member Info for NAV_Mike

Well hopefully those that sold in advance of an impending disaster may want to re-enter

On a separate note, that makes little difference to anything......

The last week or so has certainly helped me to identify those posters that seemed to revel in the idea of Sareum failing. Me personally I just want some stability and recovery. We arent going to sign a deal anytime soon, but thats not the point.....we are still fighting and hopefully the BoD will finally listen

Well I got a rough nights sleep yesterday wondering if we would still have a company and pipelines today

We didnt get a '1801 is fcked' statement, if anything, they were pretty upbeat

Many many things can be thrown at the BoD for past decisions, but as of this morning we are still breathing

Aye....guess all we can do is wait and hope the BoD is playing with something approaching a straight bat

There do seem to be a few on here that are trying to foster the doom gloom and panic. That post from Utah last night came across as stating fact and we were all going to be fcuked for sure in the morning. That may yet be proven true, but peoples motives for posting stuff like that are often nefarious

Laz...sometimes when two trades go through in quick succession the latter one can be misallocated as the spread changes before the website updates...thats what happened this morning IMHO. Sale at 14.2, then another 14.1 - the latter one got registered as a buy mistakenly (Im going to look very dumbif it was someones buy on here lol(

The problem is websites are stupid - trades get marked as buy/sells purely on their position within the spread. Ofc this only applies to non AT transactions

The price dropped after an 89k sell and what I think was a 34k sell but now in the wrong column - nothing more co-ordinated than that

If they are sitting on any bad news ahead of tomorrow then they should have the book thrown at them, but how do you prove who knew what and when? Hopefully they can soothe our jitters just a little tomorrow

Well in the absence of the doom-laden RNS we were 'promised' last night, I would say that we will be hearing about delays rather than cancellations tommorrow. They will need to come up with a compelling narrative though as the pool of HNWIs will be significantly smaller this time round if/when they need to raise any funds

IMHO any awful news that wasnt announced to the market by open this morning would leave the BoD open to claims against them, especially given the selling yesterday. Come to think of it, what triggered all the sells early on yesterday, if it wasnt a leak?

Yes that was when it went through.....did you place the order at the same time?

Hard to say because everyone is currently in the dark and jitters abound

There was a spurt of selling this morning which set the tone for a not very positive looking day. Now that selling could be down to (a) a leak of info (b) jittery holders or (c) some sort of organised ploy to induce selling

The fact that there were seven largish round number trades make me think it wasnt jittery PIs

@Bailiff

Probably not Bailiff I agree, but they may have known people who did. As I said though, Sareum most likely

@Dickpullar

I agree....definite change of tone on here. Nerves to be expected, but this being AIM, I always expect ulterior motives

Well the 189-192 region has held up so far, but it doesnt look like we are ready yet for an assault on the giddy heights of 200+

Two days now where the price has backed off quickly, but having said that its a quiet low volume morning so far

I agree Bailiff, but the problem is, the leak could have come from a couple of other places I guess.

Sareum most likely for sure, but also the testing lab and others who has early access to the RNS?

.....and there we go. Too many round number sells for the MMs to ignore Im afraid

Looks like we have a few nervy sells this morning. Cant blame them I guess but having come this far, you would think people could hang on another couple of days.

Unless of course there is a background buyet as Bailiff suggsted last week?

Mate its a SETS traded stock. It shows +/- depending on the price of the last AT trade

Spread is 3.42 - 3.5. They tried pushing it to 3.5 bid but it immediately got pushed down again

Very low volume and very narrow current spread 16.2 - 16.242

No news is no bad news?

SEE certainly doesnt seem to enjoy the afternoons recently.....US influences?

Yes...presumaby the postive tone (or spin if you like) to the last RNS wouldnt have been allowed if there wasnt at least some substance for the relative optimism expressed?

Trouble is, a lot can happen in a week on AIM

Does anyone know the size of Waymo potential vehicles on road compared to the test fleet that we are currently supplying? Im sure the info is out there, ive just not had time to read up on the company

I guess the major thing we must be wary of, is any of ORCA's projects being mothballed due to low oil prices. Still unlikely imho but we do urgently need an update from management